IFocus
You are arguing with a Galah
- Joined
- 8 September 2006
- Posts
- 7,641
- Reactions
- 4,714
It has my attention. I am enjoying his self-sabotage of credibility.
BTW still waiting on a cogent definition of right wing nutter Ifocus.
The present minority ALP government agreement with the Greens paves the way for a gradual diminution of the authority of Ms. Gillard.
The question now is, when will the shaky arrangement between a party infiltrated by old Cold War Socialists, such as the Greens, tire of the middle ground small s socialism and real politik of the ALP.
Tony will be PM within a year.
gg
I just googled rummaged "right wing nutter" and was a bit surprised at the result.
Which is??I just googled rummaged "right wing nutter" and was a bit surprised at the result.
Which is??
A recent poll showing that Malcolm Turnbull was preferred LNP leader to Tony Abbott shouldn't cause Abbott to lose any sleep. If you exclude the Labor and Green voters from the poll Abbott wins handsomely.
If you put it another way, the poll shows that Turnbull if the preferred leader of the LNP by their enemies.
Did the poll give a break down of the those who preferred malcolm as leader of the LNP or are we just assuming the supporters are labor supporters?
Well Malcolm Turncoat being red ribbon Labor in ideology... any gu'mint led by him would be a Clayton's Labor gu'mint.
It would be inconceivable that any economic liberal would prefer MT.
It might not be an opinion formed empirically nulla nulla, but I'm inclined to agree with Cal.
Did the poll give a break down of the those who preferred malcolm as leader of the LNP or are we just assuming the supporters are labor supporters?
Nulla, break down from the Age and written by Grattan...: Labor slips, would fall in landslide
Interesting to note that only two leaders are compared for labor, but three for the coalition which naturally dilutes coalition's percentages. It would have been better if this poll removed Hockey as it would make for a fairer comparison of percentages with two leaders each.
So no point in saying that Abbott only gets 41% from LNP and Gillard 49% from labor because we don't know how much of Hockey's votes would have also gone to Abbott.
However, it is very clear that the votes for Turnbull have come predominatly from the Greens and then Labor. He's not in favour with LNP voters.
And the greens clearly don't want Abbott, so the greens are skewing the results considerably - not that the media bothered to explain - they just make it look like Turnbull is preferred leader rather than WHO prefers Turnbull - big difference.
And below is an image from that article:
The thought an ex merchant banker worth 100 plus mill is a labor person defies the imagination IMHO.
If Barnaby moves house and becomes deputy leader I will be surely tempted to vote coalition............think of the tiles of the threads I could start.......hysterical.
Abbott and Barnaby has a ring don't you think.
Since very adequately answered by Sails.Did the poll give a break down of the those who preferred malcolm as leader of the LNP or are we just assuming the supporters are labor supporters?
Um, Nulla, he actually won the primary vote. The National-hating independents decided the outcome of the election. You know this very well.From memory Mr Turnball lost the leadership of the LNP by one (1) vote. Since then Tony Abbott lost the election.
A while ago I'd have agreed with this, but I think Mr Abbott has learned a bit about tactics and about when to pull his head in, and he's doing a pretty good job as opposition leader. He is every day reminding the public of what a woeful job the government are doing, and he's doing it without being strident or personally insulting.The potential challengers probably realise that in next 4 years Tony Abbott is going to have trouble not saying the wrong thing and that the appropriate time for a leadership challange will be 18 - 24 months before the next election is due.
as above, no.Given that a poll has taken place and that Mr Turnball has shown up as a preferred leader of the LNP, it is realistically possible that his supporters in the poll are in fact LNP members
Nulla, break down from the Age and written by Grattan...: Labor slips, would fall in landslide
Interesting to note that only two leaders are compared for labor, but three for the coalition which naturally dilutes coalition's percentages. It would have been better if this poll removed Hockey as it would make for a fairer comparison of percentages with two leaders each.
So no point in saying that Abbott only gets 41% from LNP and Gillard 49% from labor because we don't know how much of Hockey's votes would have also gone to Abbott.
However, it is very clear that the votes for Turnbull have come predominatly from the Greens and then Labor. He's not in favour with LNP voters.
And the greens clearly don't want Abbott, so the greens are skewing the results considerably - not that the media bothered to explain - they just make it look like Turnbull is preferred leader rather than WHO prefers Turnbull - big difference.
And below is an image from that article:
If you put it another way, the poll shows that Turnbull if the preferred leader of the LNP by their enemies.
Abbott delivered a very creditable election result from what seemed a dire position for the LNP. He has since gone on to deliver the best Neilsen poll margin since 2005, and Labor's worst position in 15 years. These are the numbers that count.
.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?