This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Tony Abbott for PM

Gotta love the Kool Aid

Nurse Ratched: You know Billy, what worries me is how your mother is going to take this.
Billy: Um, um, well, y-y-y-you d-d-d-don't have to t-t-t-tell her, Miss Ratched.
Nurse Ratched: I don't have to tell her? Your mother and I are old friends. You know that.
Billy: P-p-p-please d-d-don't tell my m-m-m-mother.
 

Thanks Ifocus .. I really do value your input. Your posts are well thought out and logical in their demeanour. Unlike my stooopid retorts. BUT .. I will try.

The problem for Labor is it is refuted, not only by Mr Abbott but by the budget papers themselves.

A cut occurs when you get less than you were getting before; an increase occurs when you receive more than you were previously getting.

Hospitals actually received an increase not a decrease. Between 2003/2004 and 2007/2008 there was an increase of 17%. That is an increase of $2.23 billion during Tony Abbott’s watch as Health Minister with the budgeted payment for 2007/2008 being $9.76 billion up from $7.49 billion.

But facts will no doubt not deter a repetition of the lie by Labor. That’s the old socialist way. The real question is will it continue to be reported as other than a lie.

OOOOOOOOOOOPSIES ....... care to try another broken record ??

http://www.thepunch.com.au/articles/labor-is-lying-about-abbotts-record-on-health/
 
HEYYYYYYYYY NUN ........... 10 Bradford Street tomorrow night to watch the Dockers get their sphincters ripped by Geelong. Bourbon on me??

oh bugga.

got a new toy m8, goin for a ride out bush on it to get feral and talk sheet with some other toothless wonders... wont be back till sat arvo..leaving fri lunchish.

plenny spiked kool aid tho


thx for the invite.......
 

Maybe a cut occurred through the percentage of what was needed was reduced and that is effectively a cut.

As someone that spent a lot of time in hospital during the Howard years I can vouch for the fact that the system degenerated during that time. I can definitely say that the system was put under pressure and even though the states were partly responsible, the feds did nothing to help ( apart from grandstanding in one Tasmanian hospital pork barrel.
 
oh bugga.

got a new toy m8, goin for a ride out bush on it to get feral and talk sheet with some other toothless wonders... wont be back till sat arvo..leaving fri lunchish.

plenny spiked kool aid tho

GOSH DARNNITT !! Got the 50 inch plasma hooked to the DVD just nice in the shed ! Even swept the floor in anticipation of your arrival.


Mebbe sunday around 2ish for sheeting of the talk?
 

Nope nioka ... do not squirm here. We are talking FACTS. The FEDS under Abbott gave more money to the states for hospitals. PERIOD.

BLAME the state hospital boards for this ........ NOT ABBOTT !

Once again ...... I value your opinion as a free thinker ... start reciprocating please.
 
Timmy,
I wrote this before you responded to my other post in the other thread. Not having a go at anyone just thinking aloud. 'People' meant humans not anyone in particular, as I am sure there are some others with your thoughts here or not here.

What does AFAIK mean? First time I've seen that.
 

Depends on who you ask!

AFAIK - As Far As I Know

If you asked a One Nation voter then it's - Another F**king Arab/African/Armenian/Argentine Immigrant K*nt

 
 
What right did Abbott have to expect support from the "Independents". Firstly they were independents because they couldnt get along with The Lib/Nats
That's exactly right, and exactly why they would never have been prepared to align themselves with the Coalition.

Costello made this very clear and we know its fact for as long as Hockey is shadow treasurer instead of Robb it shows Abbott is incapable of understanding and leadership.
I'm not sure that's quite fair, IFocus. Mr Abbott has unified the Coalition in a way that has surprised everyone, and in a way Mr Turnbull was unable to achieve.

I do agree, though, about Mr Hockey, and perhaps this is what you're meaning when you talk about Mr Abbott's leadership, i.e. that Mr Hockey should be replaced as Treasurer?

I'd like to see Malcolm Turnbull as Treasurer. I can't understand why so many commentators say Andrew Robb had 'a good campaign'. Whenever I saw/heard him he seemed unsure of himself, stumbling and quite inarticulate. Silly of him to try to get the numbers for a challenge to Julie Bishop too. Unity is everything for the Libs at this stage.

Do you think Wayne Swan deserves to remain Treasurer?
And given Bill Shorten's role in the axing of Kevin Rudd, do you think he should have a Cabinet role? If so, how will this go down with the Rudd supporters?
 
 
Read back on the last 20 post todster. Not trying to be mean. Trying to be FAIR !

Don't give a toss either way ... just want the facts as it was recorded please.

Thought it might calm you down a bit,more about your health!
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...