Yes, he does a lot. I'm a sceptic with anything politics Julia. Not sure if he hasn't made his exploits known to the media though.
Yes, he does a lot. I'm a sceptic with anything politics Julia. Not sure if he hasn't made his exploits known to the media though.
Abbott is a genuine person unlike Gillard who was grinning half the time while walking among the debris in Tas, dressed up , full make up , looking for the cameras.
Did or do you know them both in person.
As a matter of fact .........I know someoe who knows some one who did and who says all that was about about her in the S&G affair and more is true, they lament that she got so far and that she is totally unfit to be PM.
Heresay is not evidence, but speculative rumour when that far removed.
With such rubbish it is not hard to see why there is a drift away from the Libs.
Abbott will never be Prime Minister, surely its time to close down this baseless thread.
Speculative rumour about the source of my post doesnt change the facts.
I can assure you the source is impeccable otherwise I wouldn't have posted it.
In fact people have been convicted of perjury for saying publicly things on what they believed to be absolutely true and proved when tested in a court to be otherwise. And this remember, is a public forum.
.
No one should be scared of the truth including you and no amount of scare tactics to supress it will change anything.
The source was credible, so credible I beleive it, you can take it or leave it.
It is most likely true but that does not make it absolutely true. It is not a fact at law.
And if you wander through the "Religion is crazy" thread you will note a difference discussed between the elements of truth, facts and belief. Belief till shown as an object (to be felt, touched or seen) is just something residing in the/a head. God resides/exists inside peoples heads.
Might be good to take your own advice.Word of mouth do not make facts. You believe it to be so and you want it to be.
In fact people have been convicted of perjury for saying publicly things on what they believed to be absolutely true and proved when tested in a court to be otherwise. And this remember, is a public forum.
NSW Rural Fire Service, it's a metropolitan volunteer brigade, north shore Sydney, might be Manly RFB, but you'd have to google.Anyone know what volunteer fire service Tony Abott is attached to?I think in NSW the service is called the RFS...
was very keen to get her head on TV, projecting involvement and concern.
You could preface that with "Gillard" as thats looks to be exactly the case in Tas.
Of course, but on this thread we are discussing Abbott.
Or perhaps he is generally a decent person? I don't know him but find the attacks on him to be highly political and often without substance.
And surely being deceptive is not a prerequisite to being a politician? Although the bar does seem to have been set extraordinarily low in the last couple of years.
I suspect most people would find both Gillard and Abbott decent people if they knew them in person.
In your opinion, what is the worst and most political attack you have seen on Abbott? Are there no analogous political attacks on Gillard?
You're absolutely right it's just one side keeps going on about it endlessly.
How many times in the last two years have you heard any interview of a labor member that hasn't been about Abbott. It was getting to the point, people were keeping score of the number of times his name was being mentioned.
The last thing a sitting government should be doing is blaming the opposition.
We have been over this again and again.
Bring on the election, at least it will be decided one way or another.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?