This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Tony Abbott for PM

T...What riles me is his complete fraud he continues to perpetrate as a honest and decent politician only interested in Australia's future....


IF, can you substantiate your seeming defamatory comment above?

And check out Michael Smith's website if you want to see some real shady goings on. Scanned documents on there make for interesting reading: http://www.michaelsmithnews.com/
 
Just keep looking the other way folks..................
 
Aren't you looking the other way? No substantiation to your otherwise defamatory statement about Abbott?
He can't stand the overwhelming glare of the government's problems.

There will be no substantiation from behind those tightly closed eyelids.
 
He can't stand the overwhelming glare of the government's problems.

There will be no substantiation from behind those tightly closed eyelids.


lol - maybe IFocus is a misandrist (hater of men).
If we follow Gillard logic (or lack of), then are all Abbott haters misandrists?...
 
David Marr will be on Lateline tonight, to issue an apology to Abbott for the incorrect information he published about him just as The Australian did when they mixed up 'trust fund' and 'slush fund' in relation to Gillard? Sadly I suspect not
 
lol - maybe IFocus is a misandrist (hater of men).
If we follow Gillard logic (or lack of), then are all Abbott haters misandrists?...
It doesn't matter how smelly it is.

He loves his "Kick me, i voted Labor" T-shirt so much, he can't take it off.
 
The Australian's paywall can be bypassed by doing a Google search of the headline under news.

It's a minor inconvenience, but not a real paywall.
 

Said it once and still worth repeating in bold

Since that post two other people have backed up Barbara Ramjams comments on Abbotts intimidation of her.
And he still insists he "nver dun it".

Perhaps he should sue them for defamation to preserve his good name ( or the fiction he perpetuates regarding it.)

Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/opinion/po...inst-a-wall-20120913-25ty2.html#ixzz26KLRxqRR
 
Whata a crock of BS...

Dopey Swan and Gillard the crook are just trying to turn the tables on Abbott after Gillard was found out to be stealing money and being all round dodgy.

The sooner we have an election the better I'm fed up to the back teeth with Gillard and her mob of complete and utter idiots.
 
And for the second witness to bully boy Abbott consider this statement.

Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/opinion/politics/abbotts-habits-die-hard-20120912-25snx.html#ixzz26KLxo8Xg

You can check out the full story at the link.

(Why is it so hard to post an extract from a story ? My uploads keep getting bounced until I cut them to pieces. Any reasons Mods ? )
 

Basilo, if you are so concerned about something that MIGHT have happened 35 years ago to the opposition leader, why aren't you even more keen to find out if the PM had anything to do with missing union money and a slush fund only 17 years ago?

It seems the left are desperate to try and get dirt on Abbott while keeping their heads in the sand on the pages of scanned documents that could implicate Gillard found on Michael Smith's site. Even McClellend raised this issue about Gillard in Parliament. I doubt it will go away.

http://www.michaelsmithnews.com/
 
Yeah.... :sleeping:

We all know Tones is a headkicker basilio. Sails is onto it, an amateurish attempt at diversion.
 
I think he is in trouble over this, plenty of witnesses and his cant remember or denial digs a deeper hole.

Everyone knows it is / was part of his character ask Pauline Hanson.

Its fascinating reading about his behaviour as a student.
 
I think he is in trouble over this, plenty of witnesses and his cant remember or denial digs a deeper hole.

Everyone knows it is / was part of his character ask Pauline Hanson.

Its fascinating reading about his behaviour as a student.

You forget something...........people couldn't care less., this is our paid polititians playing games instead of doing their job.
Gillards another matter, nasty piece of work and crooked.
 
I don't think the incident itself is all that much of a problem for him. I mean, what does it tell us about Abbott that we didn't already know? That he is a fanatical hard-right religious nut who hates and fears independant women and tries to intimidate them, in this case violently? Pfft! Nothing new here, all stuff everybody with half a clue has known for years. I cannot see this hurting Abbott in any way. Well, maybe a tiny bit, but we are talking very small change here.

What is serious here is Abbott's lies. First he "can't remember", then he changes his story (after advice from his minders, one assumes) and flat out denies everything. Presumably, he did not expect that there would be so many witnesses to the violent intimidation incident prepared to come forward and give sworn evidence - he could have shrugged off the original incident as something stupid he did as a young man, and now regrets (hey - every single one of us has done dumb stuff at that age) but now he has to explain why he lied about it. That's a big, big problem he's facing now.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...