This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Tony Abbott for PM


Yes I do. Never thought pointing out a misquote would cause such a reaction.
 
Campbell Newman is already backing off his previously suggested target of at least 20,000 jobs gone.
This evening he is saying it's likely to be under 15,000. He seems to be testing the waters re how much he can do without losing too much in the polls.
 

hes got 3 years till an election, get the cuts down now itll be better by the time election comes round, labor are dead in the water in this country, the time to get rid of the bloated RDO fields to get the fat trimmed.
 
I intended to start a thread on Industrial Relations but looking back, I found one was opened six years ago and there was no interest, only four posts.

Tony Abbott will be dragged kicking and screaming to soon state his policy on IR. Swan or Shorten has only to mention Work Choices and he scurries back to his burrow like a frightened rabbit. Eric Abetz on the other hand shows more guts. IR will be centre stage come the next election.

The Grocon dispute shows what happens when FWA actually encourages union thuggery, by having minimum punitive action.


http://www.abc.net.au/worldtoday/content/2012/s3577464.htm
 
The coalition are going to have to deal with this sort of bias to industrial action:

My bold:


Read more: Judge lashes Fair Work laws
 
The coalition are going to have to deal with this sort of bias to industrial action:

Time to debate workplace laws
From: The Australian August 29, 2012 12:00AM

(My Bolds)
 
Time to debate workplace laws
From: The Australian August 29, 2012 12:00AM

(My Bolds)

The union bosses actually thought they were in the right when it came to the violence and blamed police as being "tools of the construction bosses"
 
I understand the Union's behaviour was in defiance of a Supreme Court order.
How can they get away with this????
 
One thing that has become obvious is TA short, sharp, catchy rhetoric is probably the best course of action.
If he had gone into convoluted responses to government policy, he would now be turned on his head and trying to explain his position.
The governments position has shifted 180 degrees.

Malcolm Turbull would be a blubbering goose trying to explain his position, he would look sillier than the greens.
His stance could be percieved as more left wing than labor now.
Labor is showing the last thing you should have is policy, just a goal.
 
Well he certainly hasn't changed much has he ? Abusive, arrogent, totally destructive. I would be interested to hear his response to the whole story - apart from the incident where he intimidated Barbara Ramjam

And exactly what are this piece of xxxxs good points ?::frown:
 
Not that there would be the slightest tinge of bias in either your view or David Marr's, would there!
Marr has made his loathing of Tony Abbott clear for years. You have done likewise.
Both of you are referring to an claimed event more than 25 years ago which the woman says happened and Mr Abbott says doesn't. Who the hell cares anyway?

Mr Marr seems to consider himself the archetypal judge of character. Some people would question his own character.
 
Mr Marr seems to consider himself the archetypal judge of character. Some people would question his own character.

I must admit I get a kick out of Marr's theatrical sanctimony - a bit like I suppose right leaning people probably get the same kick out of reading Piers Akerman. What is more good old fashioned fun than kicking a few politicians heads? I'm getting nostalgic for good old fashioned newspaper journos.
 

Yeah, funny that the article didn't mention anything good about Abbott, did the alarm bells not not ring for you then that this article might just be a teeny weeny bit biased?

Worst example of so called journalism I've seen in a long time, own goal for The Age on this one I think. The portrait David Marr paints is so far removed from what I know of Tony Abbott's character it's laughable.

As Julia said, Marr is known to have an intense dislike of Abbott so we have to take anything he writes about him with a huge grain of salt.

Interesting that this article appears just after Gillard is in the spotlight for her dubious activities with S&G, obvious and clunky deflection attempt here I think
 
Reading about Abbott in those early years, he may not have been a genius but he was a goer a doer. Ambitious, headstrong (as you should be as a young man) but really strong in his beliefs. He seems so likeable.

He now looks a bit worn down, weaker in his beliefs and forced to behave under the weight of his party. Oh for the good old days!
 
That's an interesting perspective. Others might say he has matured out of ill-disciplined youthful and possibly arrogant attitudes into a more rounded individual.
 
That's an interesting perspective. Others might say he has matured out of ill-disciplined youthful and possibly arrogant attitudes into a more rounded individual.

You mean he has gained wisdom.

The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts.
Bertrand Russell (1872 - 1970)
 
The behaviour reported about Abbott is certainly not out of step with his history.

Its surprising so many here forget his recent history as Howard's attack dog.

How would that a line with his behaviour as a hot head young student.

What riles me is his complete fraud he continues to perpetrate as a honest and decent politician only interested in Australia's future.

What rubbish.
 
What riles me is his complete fraud he continues to perpetrate as a honest and decent politician only interested in Australia's future.
As a nation, we are so blessed to have a PM that represents the benchmark for these fine characteristics, except of course when she was young and naive and perhaps once or twice since.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...