- Joined
- 23 April 2008
- Posts
- 1,850
- Reactions
- 627
Tony Abbott's efforts in the "Ironman" was perseverance, not his parliamentary performance.Abbott deserves a go, imo. If he fails, he will meet the same fate as Gillard. However, he has put up with screeching tirades in parliament and having his name put through the mud. It shows he has perseverance.
Well, isn't it about time he does show us what sort of PM he would be?
I'd say the electorate has seen enough of him over many years to have a pretty clear idea about whether they like/trust him or not. So far, he's not gaining the unqualified support of much of the electorate.
That's all that's left for Labor and it's supporters.
Abbott, Abbott, Abbott.
The sound of resignation is clear in the Labor voices in their media commentary on their forum on the economy, including the PM.
Meanwhile, in the real world,
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/nat...-gfc-business/comments-fn59nsif-1226393620676
Yes, and this is a consistent feature. Malcolm Turnbull rates pretty highly also.The strange irony is that Rudd is higher in the PM popularity stakes than Gillard or Abbott.
I read the same comment. Clearly Rudd is detested by many of his colleagues, probably the reason he has not by now displaced Ms Gillard who is at least apparently liked by most of them.I read a comment in one of the papers the other day which made the point, that to get to know Gillard or Abbott personally was to like them. Whereas to get to know Rudd well was to hate him, as most of his cabinet did.
Yep, the May survey showed a pretty dismal result. Amusing to see Mr Swan not commenting on the May NAB survey. A bit hard to strut around with a big grin and a puffed up chest on that.Where last week's national accounts showed growth of 4.3 per cent in the year to March, the National Australia Bank's chief economist Alan Oster said the May Survey results were consistent with growth of no more than 2 per cent.
Just keep looking the other way as I am sure its too painful for you lot to watch Abbott.
As for the economy governments have little impact short term but given the extreme shrill from these threads that the sky is falling its must be embarrassing that it isn't.
Abbotts and Hockeys comments re the economic numbers were just incredulous, living the lies that they weave for the faithful.
Maybe Malcolm Turnbull as Treasurer and Christian Porter as Finance Minister?He will add a lot of fire power to the coalition front bench. IMO
Maybe Malcolm Turnbull as Treasurer and Christian Porter as Finance Minister?
Would be an improvement over the present Shadow ministers.
Maybe Malcolm Turnbull as Treasurer and Christian Porter as Finance Minister?
Would be an improvement over the present Shadow ministers.
I don't think Malcolm is up to a Ministerial position. So far he has been disappointingly unimpressive, imo.
That's because he's not trying, at least not for the team.I don't think Malcolm is up to a Ministerial position. So far he has been disappointingly unimpressive, imo.
Malcolm wants to be PM, not a lowly independent.+1 he may as well run as an independent.
I don't think Malcolm is up to a Ministerial position. So far he has been disappointingly unimpressive, imo.
Well the latest news out of W.A is Christian Porter is moving to federal politics. That will really put a cat among the pigeons for labor.
If labor loose the next election, which is a foregone conclusion, then Porter joins parliament. He will be fast tracked and is a really polished performer, I wouldn't be surprised to see him touted as successor for Tony.
He will add a lot of fire power to the coalition front bench. IMO
Not an issue for Labor Porter didn't worry the local state Labor players but major drama for the Liberal faceless men as they have to shore up the right wing which I don't think Porter is part of so what will they do with him?
Also you would think he would have to get in line there is a lot of very good talent on the back bench unlike the Coalition front bench.
True. His brief attempt at being Leader was embarrassing, viz the Godwin Grech fiasco.I don't think Malcolm is up to a Ministerial position. So far he has been disappointingly unimpressive, imo.
He will never do that. No path to being a Party Leader there. He wants to be PM or at the very least Leader of the Opposition. Clearly dislikes following orders which is understandable given his previous entrepreneurial background.+1 he may as well run as an independent.
You're probably right, noco, much as I dislike conceding that. He's very personable in appearance, voice and bearing.Yes I agree. He is too close Labor's ideology.
The only thing Turnbull has going for him is, he is more handsome than Abbott and the majority of women fall for looks all the time. Does not matter what his policies are so long as he is good lookin'.
Which individuals do you have in mind here IFocus?Also you would think he would have to get in line there is a lot of very good talent on the back bench unlike the Coalition front bench.
Agree. Mr Brough was a pretty impressive performer imo.If I were Tony Abbott I would be a bit worried about Mal Brough being in the next parliament, as he certainly will be if he gets pre-selected, for Slipper's seat of Fisher.
If I were Tony Abbott I would be a bit worried about Mal Brough being in the next parliament, as he certainly will be if he gets pre-selected, for Slipper's seat of Fisher.
Agree. Mr Brough was a pretty impressive performer imo.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?