Sinister is taking this guys' claim of human rights violations as fact which is what the video has done. If you want to believe it that's your prerogative. I am far more likely to buy the rebuttal by the prison more than a claim from a Youtube video about a criminal with form for being an a-grade bullshidder.No, under the harsh light of publicity they had to revert to the actual rule of law. In any case you may have noticed that I was specifically referring to the circumstances of his imprisonment, which clearly be breached his human rights under British law.
It is alarming that you guys are actually ignoring this or waving it off as some sort of beat up. Also not the least bit surprised that the likes of basilio are referring to the initial falsehoods of secret barrusterr for the fact of the matter rather than referring to the actual truth of the matter.
****ing sinister.
Wasn't there some (overblown?) reaction after he was on sky?Hi wayneL, are you also a fan of Blair Cottrell?
Wasn't there some (overblown?) reaction after he was on sky?
Ahh, the good old Strawman.Hi wayneL, are you also a fan of Blair Cottrell?
How Sky can claim to be a serious News organisation and give time to Neo Nazis is beyond me.
Ahh, the good old Strawman.
Oh how puerile.Middle aged men with failed careers spending their evenings hosting little watched tv shows – pro bono – doesn't sound like the makings of a serious news organisation.
Then again, that is their demographic skew so better the devil you know!
He has posted updates since: https://thesecretbarrister.com/2018/08/01/the-tommy-robinson-judgment-what-does-it-all-mean/
Bring it on McLovin.
Anytime bro.
Oh how puerile.
I gave you more credit than that.
The channel may have an ageing audience – 23,000 of Bolt's aforementioned 27,000 viewers were in the 55+ age demographic, while 27,000 of Jones' 34,000 were in the same senior bracket – but surely they could handle the odd jolt.
I found all the analysis of the secret barrister very illuminating. Lots of law, lots of exploration of legal procedures. Well worth a read.
I'm not surprised that other posters have excised particular comments that somehow shine a favourable light on the issue on repeated contempt charges against Tommy. For what its worth I'll also add the final comments made by the secret barrister. In my view it puts it all in persepective.
I think I may have been. But looking back over the litany of plainly false statements circulated between May and now – that Robinson’s “reporting” was nothing more than the BBC had done; that he was targeted by the deep state; that Robinson’s original barrister was an “unqualified duty solicitor”; that TR was never in contempt of court as the trial was over; that the courts were “covering up” serious crimes by certain racial groups; the dishonest framing of the debate as one of “free speech” rather than interfering with justice; and the other hundreds of fantastical theories clogging my Twitter notifications today – I’d suggest, self-servingly, that an inaccurate but well-meaning prediction – such as we all make in the courts every day – is lesser a social evil than the deliberate, racially-tinged misinformation campaign that we do our best to counter.
How is that even relevant to the views put forth therein? Either a person has a right to air his or her views as per natural rights of free speech (subject to reasonable caveats) or not.Who do you think is watching that cr@p? It's talkback radio on a TV screen.
Who do you think is watching that cr@p? It's talkback radio on a TV screen.
About 5,000 so I heard.
Tony Abbott followers probably.
What was it about, or did they already take it down?How Sky can claim to be a serious News organisation and give time to Neo Nazis is beyond me.
If they also gave time to Marxists they may claim to be balanced, but giving exposure to any extremists takes them out of the mainstream and into the looney brigade.
What was it about, or did they already take it down?
Okay Horace. I can see the guy is anti Islamist. That is not necessarily a Nazi position.How Sky can claim to be a serious News organisation and give time to Neo Nazis is beyond me.
If they also gave time to Marxists they may claim to be balanced, but giving exposure to any extremists takes them out of the mainstream and into the looney brigade.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?