Past experience has taught me to be extremely cautious about any company that tries to sell itself as something other than what it actually is.Part of the problem with TNE is they have been trying to sell themselves as a high growth SaaS tech business for obvious reasons - but they are not really
Past experience has taught me to be extremely cautious about any company that tries to sell itself as something other than what it actually is.
Past experience has taught me to be extremely cautious about any company that tries to sell itself as something other than what it actually is.
Regardless of the detail of what it is and what it claims to be, the simple fact of them not matching is a red flag.
Past experience has taught me to be extremely cautious about any company that tries to sell itself as something other than what it actually is.
Regardless of the detail of what it is and what it claims to be, the simple fact of them not matching is a red flag.
There aren't any.... simple really.
But you spruik Paragon Care @ 17 cents? It's still 17 Cents....
Past experience doesn't seem to have taught you what you say it has....????
I'm not spruiking Paragon.
Drawing attention to sudden volatility in the price of the company's shares and suggesting that anyone holding or otherwise interested in the stock might be wise to investigate what's going on is a very different thing to spruiking it.
As for red flags - there's been a few over the years.
One that comes to mind is a certain company that spent a lot of time drawing attention to their having driven a diesel powered car around the country successfully. Well yes they did, but that's hardly groundbreaking and long story short the company ended up being liquidated.
I'm not saying TNE is necessarily a dud, but I'm always cautious of anyone who claims to be something other than what they actually are.
If you're looking for a red flag, look no further than the company you spruiked.
Nobody's spruiking anything.
Investing or trading profitably requires an objective approach regardless of whether that's via a strictly mechanical system, discretionary technical trading, fundamental analysis or whatever.
Drawing attention to a company the share price of which jumped over 85% then dropped half way back down again over the course of two trading days is not spruiking. It's just drawing attention to it for those who may have an interest in the stock and wish to investigate further.
What I am drawing attention to is that you simply aren't telling the truth, not before, not now and probably not ever...
Again, your emotions are getting in the way of rational thought, its obvious that Smurf1976 was referring to Paragon when he talked about drawing attention to those price movements - the issue you attacked him for initially.
Maybe, just maybe, some of that self reflection I suggested, and then how about an apology? This is not the place for personal attacks and it only reflects on your character.
Go back and read the thread mate, you have completely lost the plot, you have jumped to incorrect assumptions because you failed to comprehend posts, you have personally attacked forum members and you absolutely refuse to practice any self reflection about your emotions overriding any rational discussion of the business.
Time for a hard block from me, I have tried to politely help you to no avail, I have more productive uses for my time.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?