skc
Goldmember
- Joined
- 12 August 2008
- Posts
- 8,277
- Reactions
- 329
There's also no reason why live sport is immune from streaming. Optus flopped with the EPL, but give it a few years and Foxtel could be totally redundant for anything more than re-runs of the Real Housewives of Dubbo.
The NBA has a great streaming service for all the basketball any fan would ever want to watch.. and that costs ~$200 for the entire season. It doesn't take a lot of technological innovation to stream and it doesn't take much marketing to reach your audience - who are fans to start with. I am guessing that, there is still a lot of organisational momentum behind the massive cash inflow from broadcast rights each year, and they can't be sure that streaming revenue can match that. Plus it's always good to have more than one party bidding for your product, as in the case with the rights auctions.
The 3 FTA channels combined make up only 4% of TLS market cap. So even if Telstra got them to double in value in 4 years, it's only 1% growth p.a for TLS. Simiarly a takeover of a 2nd tier telco like VOC (hypothetically) would be the same maths.
just look at the numbers that win the ratings these days
Back in the old days it wasn't unknown that 3 million or more watched the same program on TV and we had a significantly smaller national population back then too.
Well a lot of fund managers, will try and crank it up, before bailing.IMO
So it will be interesting to see, how your chart plays out.
The problem, as I see it is, there is nothing but negatives supporting the price.
Then management asks the share holders, what do you think we should do, jeez why are we paying them ridiculous wages?
Telstra will end up at a price that reflects its earnings, we just have to work out what the earnings will be.
If you are not into squiggly lines skip this post or if you are into EW we can take the squiggly line discussion to the appropriate thread.
If you are wondering about what the price could do then this is one of the options I am looking at, purely as an exercise of course.
Weekly chart...
View attachment 70750
Back in the old days it wasn't unknown that 3 million or more watched the same program on TV and we had a significantly smaller national population back then too.
So there's a shift definitely.
There's a stat floating around that 1/3rd of 14-29 year olds in Australia never watch TV. That's the future of television. It explains why TEN felt it first.
They seemed to run out of puff at about $4.20, given the market really bounced today, a 3c rise wasn't really inspiring.
What would that indicate, from your understanding Boggo?
I am only starting to follow charting ideology, so would that indicate a lack of confidence, or just a lack of nerve?
So from my fundamental ideology(if that's what it is called), it would appear that there are willing sellers, at a rising price.
Therefore if the price rises and the volume drops, it would indicate the price will rise further because people don't want to sell? even though Telstra don't have a plan?
The alternative would be, the price rises and the volume rises, which would cause a price drop, because everyone is bailing out?
Hope you don't think I'm picking your brains, just trying to get a handle on charting, before July 1
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?