JohnDe
La dolce vita
- Joined
- 11 March 2020
- Posts
- 4,312
- Reactions
- 6,377
I could say the same to you, all of your comments are regurgitated from the racist left.
Why don't you stump up with your own ideas?
I read the piece and it only makes sense if you you do not understand what racism is.
So let me go through it's preamble:
First, it's not at all "strange" that bipartisan support disappeared when Dutton took the helm from Morrison. Anyone seriously thinking that a man that refused to attend Rudd's Apology would support the Voice has rocks in their head.
The second sentence has nothing to do with the Voice. The concept of equality is already built into our system of laws. The Voice is about rectifying disadvantage.
The second sentence fails to grasp the simple concept that the first inhabitants were a different race. To suggest that's "racist" defies common sense.
The third sentence descends into muck raking. What are these "legitimate questions"? The unanswered questions will be determined by Parliament, as has been clarified many times.
The fourth sentence is blatant misinformation. What the Voice seeks to achieve and how it can operate has been thoroughly detailed, so its a lie to say it's "vague". The other claims have nothing to do with the Voice, but read well to those who are keen to suppress indigenous advancement.
Much of the rest of the article has little to do with the Voice.
What you always see is avoidance of the actual questions being asked and, in the media, the creation of a new narrative.
Those observations always make sense. The challenge is as usual in the implementation.
That doesn't mean we don't have a go.
All you have said is that we don't really know how it will work in practise.You really have had a miserable time posting.
What I wrote was correct. There are clear design principles for how the Voice can work. Parliament may choose to set it up differently.
My comments are based on my understanding of what is being put to a referendum and I can guarantee them to be original.I could say the same to you, all of your comments are regurgitated from the racist left.
Except the Voice is not involved in governance."The case against is clearer, reasoned and principled in rejecting race as a factor in Australia’s governance structure”
Completely untrue.All you have said is that we don't really know how it will work in practise.
There is ZERO additional bureaucracy.That doesn't mean that we need another layer of entrenched bureaucracy to achieve results.
Except the Voice is not involved in governance.
Do you understand that many of the attributions you post don't make sense?
There is ZERO additional bureaucracy.
With good management it will be possible to reduce the number of bureaucrats involved in policy development for ATSI peoples and achieve better results.
Stop spreading lies!
Ha ha.
The voice representatives and their staff and hangers on will be paid by the taxpayer yes ?
That's a bureaucracy.
So you endorse the current bureaucracy top down approach that the Gap Report has consistently shown year after year to fail the basics over a change that strives to allow stakeholders to put forward solutions and take ownership of them?
Bureaucracies are part of government.Ha ha.
The voice representatives and their staff and hangers on will be paid by the taxpayer yes ?
That's a bureaucracy.
Peddling more lies as well.They can do that now, what it really means is they want more money.
Not an original thought, sigh..."Albanese betrays contempt for voters by insisting we vote for the Voice without knowing any of the details on its composition, functions and powers. Those who insist otherwise are either naive or gaslighting us. The Voice is racist in conception and will be racist in content and consequences"
Yes, the Voice is racist | The Spectator Australia
We live in strange times. A race-based constitutional body will ensure racial equality. Those calling for a race-blind constitution and public policy are racists. Those spewing hatred and bile at…www.spectator.com.au
Bureaucracies are part of government.
Yet another blatant attempt at racism.
Peddling more lies as well.
When will your nonsense cease?
The Voice is neither a bureaucracy nor a part of government so you claims are outright lies.All over the shop.
First you say that the voice is not a bureaucracy then you flip it off as a part of government.
BYW had a really interesting conversation with local police officers (Timbuktu) this morning it was confidential but just blows big holes though the yes arguments here.BYW had a really interesting conversation with local police officers (Kununarra) this morning it was confidential but just blows big holes though the negative arguments here.
Not an original thought, sigh...
Every point has been answered but you keep propagating the misinformation of others for some reason.
Is there a reason you cannot work out what "racism" is?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?