tech/a
No Ordinary Duck
- Joined
- 14 October 2004
- Posts
- 20,452
- Reactions
- 6,504
Will be funny to see how the technical/mechanical trader's 'tight' stop losses work on leveraged positions when the physical stocks gap 5-10% down one day.
No stops getting matched, margin calls on stock falling in a straight line. The assumption of continuous pricing has crushed more than one 'smarty'.
No matter how much you 'test' your 'systems' - a one-in-a-thousand day will rip you apart if you are excessively leveraged.
40% banks, 20% RIO and Hills - much of the industrial sector is already smoked. I love the resources, but we are very due for a pullback and many no-growth industrials are hitting PEs over 16.
Anyone prepared for 50 bps of interest rate rises in Aust?
bullmarket said:the chart I posted a few posts back is a daily and not weekly chart and so those are 65 and 200 day and not weekly averages....sorry for any confusion.
Joe/Wayne - any chance of increasing the current 20 minute editing time to something a little longer like say at least an hour?
tech/a said:Its like having a LARGER Profit and succumbing to the temptation to take profit,only to see the stock move up another 400%.
Relax mate, I am not taking the p!ss out of you!
Smurf1976 said:A question for those who have the necessary software / data.
How broadly based is this present advance in the market? How many of the top, say, 300 stocks are actually at or near all time highs?
In other words, is the ASX in the midst of a broad advance or is the index simply being pushed higher by a few star performers?
TraderPro said:You guys might like to read this column by Alan Kohler today...
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2006/04/18/1145344086511.html?page=fullpage#contentSwap1
BSD said:A couple of points regarding market PEs
1. What does the market PE look like ex-BHP,RIO, Banks and Insurers?
- bloody expensive when you consider the expected EPS growth ex-resources is very low
Hence my point regarding the uselessness of our index in making many investment decisions
2. The higher the risk free rate - the lower the PE must become.
With growth ex-resources getting low and GDP growth tracking around the 2-3% levels a 6% earnings yield (16times) on equities is not sufficient
tech/a said:I think its very normal for so much bear sentiment.
Its like having a LARGER Profit and succumbing to the temptation to take profit,only to see the stock move up another 400%.
There is absolutely nothing I have seen that gives credible evidence to a pending crash.
I see much which gives credence to a boom that will and can continue due to excessive demand.
bullmarket said:I took out BHP, RIO, WBC, ANZ, CBA, NAB and QBE (I haven't removed any other insurers) as you suggested and the weighted average PER jumps to 18.8 on todays prices.
Either way, I think our market is looking at best around 'fair' value assuming a fair PER of ~17 with a bias to looking a little pricey. I still don't see our market as grossly expensive overall as I mentioned earlier.
cheers
bullmarket
BSD said:Setting aside the resource sector - where is the growth coming from?
It isnt from the domestic economy that is for sure.
I remember in 2002 trying to get clients to buy stocks with PEs of 12 and EPS growth of 20%pa.
How a bullmarket changes the mindset. We switch from absolute to relative value.
18 times is bloody expensive in my opinion.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?