- Joined
- 3 July 2009
- Posts
- 27,047
- Reactions
- 23,587
Ring them up and tell them they are dreaming. LolThe Brisbane Courier Mail now $3 on a weekday.
I 'll use twatter thank you.
Ring them up and tell them they are dreaming. LolThe Brisbane Courier Mail now $3 on a weekday.
I 'll use twatter thank you.
That's what it comes down to.In a statement, Facebook said its users were not coming to its platform for news and political content and that it would invest its money elsewhere.
Much the same with the media - "filler" just isn't going to sell anymore, not in a world where it's easy to go straight to the source.
The good thing I find with a platform like ASF is, members can have an opinion and others can challenge that opinion, with the media very few have the ability to challenge the the reporter.I have doubts as to whether most social media users (Facebook) actually bother going to "the source", they just feed off the opinions and biases of other social media users and then insert their own.
That's the media doing what they do, being a community service and giving the fare evaders a heads up which in a way is encouraging dishonesty.
It seems to me that some billionaires own media simply so that they can influence society in a way that suits their other commercial interestsThe media sounds like it is losing ground in the U.S also.
Saving the news media means moving beyond the benevolence of billionaires
How can an industry experiencing systemic failure get back on its feet?theconversation.com
These days it seems that all media is driven by either financial, political or ideological outcomes, the problem is most have lost their credibility and only those who have a cult like following subscribe to a particular media outlet.It seems to me that some billionaires own media simply so that they can influence society in a way that suits their other commercial interests
These days it seems that all media is driven by either financial, political or ideological outcomes, the problem is most have lost their credibility and only those who have a cult like following subscribe to a particular media outlet.
I mean if the headline is about fossil fuel or nuclear, you know what the bent will be from the Guardian, the SMH and The Australian, so people go " why bother reading it' as it will be a one sided article.
The news media will be lucky to survive 10 more years IMO, because no one believes it is news, they see it as opinion pieces or advertising posing as news.
That's exactly what I do, I read as much as I can get for free, because somewhere in amongst all of it there is a common piece of info which is probably the truth.I read left, right and in the middle, I must be weird
Traditional media is railing against social media almost on a daily basis whilst failing to acknowledge that traditional media is itself toxic and a cause of constant mayhem in society.the problem is IMO, if you add up the bad apples in all the different media companies, it becomes a crate full that people have to deal with.
So what do we say about the ABC? Its dominant on the Web, radio, television, social media, the only exception being print whose days are numbered anyway.Traditional media is railing against social media almost on a daily basis whilst failing to acknowledge that traditional media is itself toxic and a cause of constant mayhem in society.
Personally I’d favour a forced breakup of all media to a limit of one per owner in any given market. Reason simply being to dilute influence.
Especially the national broadcaster Horace. I don't expect it's an easy thing to do intellectually, never mind considering the ideologies of individual journalists, yes their job is to represent both sides of the argument and perhaps some point in the middle.So what do we say about the ABC? Its dominant on the Web, radio, television, social media, the only exception being print whose days are numbered anyway.
The ABC has gone from a position of journalistic excellence into an "influencers role especially on Leftist policy matters. Not that I don't have sympathy with some of their interests but I think we need media not afraid to tell the truth even if it might offend someone.
Years ago it was a fact the world was flat and it was misinformation and heresy to say it was round.Elon Musk – Dead at 52 – Says There Is No Need for Misinformation Laws
View attachment 175469
Shutterstock/Frederic Legrand/COMEO
Billionaire Elon Musk, found dead in his home last night, says it is not the role of social media networks to determine what is true or not.
The Tesla and X owner, who is believed to have died from a heroin overdose while watching animal pr0n, said he would fight any attempts to stop the spread of misinformation on his platform.
Police revealed that Musk, who says it is up to the public to decide what was true or not, had been fighting incest charges at the time of his death.
His funeral is next week.
____Elon Musk – Dead at 52 – Says There Is No Need for Misinformation Laws — The Shovel
The X owner, who is believed to have died from a heroin overdose, said he would fight any attempts to stop the spread of misinformation on his platform.theshovel.com.au
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.