- Joined
- 2 July 2008
- Posts
- 7,102
- Reactions
- 6
Best we leave it there I think - it's not really a discussion is it?
No ...more like misrepresentation on your part.
Best we leave it there I think - it's not really a discussion is it?
Sounds ridiculous, doesn't it, and biologically probably not quite possible. However, there absolutely are people who would do this if they could.I think this policy could cost the government more than they will save. I suspect that foster care will increase, destitute families desperately needing housing will add to the government financial burden and some mothers are very likely to go and get themselves pregnant once again which will reap them yet another baby bonus and another 8 years on the pension.
If a woman goes on long enough, she might be able to keep that up until she goes on the old age pension - or she will have enough older children to help her out while she is at work!
I can assure you there are many families where it's of the utmost importance how old the youngest child is.I hadn't considered the aspect that I've bolded, but you raise an excellent point - the type of woman who would have a baby purely to get the baby bonus, would no doubt see another pregnancy as a way to stay on a higher benefit - costing the taxpayer even more in the long run!
I I don't necessarily think it's a case of how old the youngest child is, but of what support systems are in place or available, and the likely outcomes for the child/children concerned.
All "single mums" became mums by choice, many just to get the ill-considered baby bonus. Thus by choice they are trying to raise kids they can't afford. They then expect the taxpayer to become the surrogate father.
Yes, I know, I know, it's the kids that suffer, so the taxpayer has no alternative to picking up the tab, even though these children will never get out of the rut created by thoughtless parents.
Gillard, with her pal Bob Hawke in tow, turned up at the Woodford Folk Festival in Queensland about a week ago. Obviously a publicity stunt that she hopes will rake in some younger voters at the next election.
What's your proof for this statement?
A lot of people sprout it, but can you name 1 person you directly know who has done this??
I would hazard a guess that most single parents did not plan to have children, or if they did they have been left i the lurch by a partner who walked away from their responsibilities.
I saw this on the news and was disappointed to hear Hawke trot out the line that Gillard had been a victim of unfair criticism because of her sex. Never thougth Hawke would stoop so low as to play the sexism card
I saw this on the news and was disappointed to hear Hawke trot out the line that Gillard had been a victim of unfair criticism because of her sex. Never thougth Hawke would stoop so low as to play the sexism card
Hawk was a drunken loud mouth idiot back in the day.
He would tell porkies as much as the next poli
Ah yes.......Bob Hawke – a foul-mouthed, drunken, womanising degenerate back in his heyday, a man of poor character who was capable of blatant dishonesty, and still is. Just the type who would impress someone like Gillard.
That sums him up, a nasty arrogant ********, who used tears to get votes.
The children are still in poverty Bob , you made that promise while rubbing shoulders with Kerry Packer at the casino with a huge cigar in your mouth.
Backstabbed his wife into the bargain, a Labor legend and a true match for Gillard.
ask him how great he was at kung fu. Loudest wanker in the pubIt sounds like some of you people know Bobby on a personal level.Perhaps you would like to titilate us with some salacious recollections?
ask him how great he was at kung fu. Loudest wanker in the pub
ask him how great he was at kung fu. Loudest wanker in the pub
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.