- Joined
- 23 November 2004
- Posts
- 3,974
- Reactions
- 850
Quote of the year from Abbott if Australia cannot beat Luxembourg the goverment should give up.
Guess who came second beating Finland, guess what Abbott knows about diplomacy......0........turn back the boats really.
According to Bob Catarrh on ABC news radio this am, Australia won the seat based on it's fair and peaceful society, wonderful cities, etc etc. Call me cynical, but maybe it was spending AU$25M that got the job done?
So, based on Catarrh's reasoning, that's why Rwanda also got a seat, eh? Fair & peaceful society & wonderful cities too huh? http://www.aljazeera.com/news/africa/2012/10/20121018175059955706.html
Can anyone tell me how much the peace loving Rwandans spent on bribing the UN compared to our wonderful Bob Catarrh's bid?
Oh well, AU$25M for a temp 2 year jump seat at the UN circus. A snip at the price. LOL
Wonder how much it will cost to get another 2 year gig after that? Gotta love our pollies. So much responsibility shown.
From: http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2012/10/18/267480/5-new-states-awarded-unsc-seats/
Australia 140 votes Luxembourg 131 votes
In mathematics speak 140>131
Yes, real bad call Tony
I wonder what the Labor-bashing brigade would've said if a Lib/Nat gov'mint had succeeded.
FFS - give our elected government some credit for increasing Australia's recognition Internationally!
Sure, they've made some blunders, most of them brought about by nutters and do-gooders on the Utopian fringe. But if you want representative democracy, you have to accept that a sufficient number of Australians voted for Milne, Hanson-Young, Katter, Joyce... and not enough for rational leaders of either persuasion.
So, take a bow, Australia; the UN may not be as relevant and effective as it could and should be, but it offers the ability to publicly present our views. Given that the tenure extends well past the next election, I hope that our next government won't make a mess of the opportunity.
AAh think the Luxembourg number is from a 2nd round against Finland (there are only 193 members) that makes Abbott's call even further below par still with his track record its what we will get when he is PM
Does anyone know how it actually works? Do we presently have an ambassador to the UN who will fill the role?
Is someone new appointed?
Mr Gary Quinlan
Gary Quinlan
Download photograph
Photo 1
Photo 2
Ambassador and Permanent Representative to the United Nations, New York
Biography
Since 2007 until his current appointment as Ambassador and Permanent Representative to the United Nations, Mr Quinlan was the Senior Advisor to the Prime Minister on Foreign Affairs, Defence, and National Security.
Mr Quinlan joined the then Department of Foreign Affairs in 1973 and has served in several senior positions in the Department in Canberra including First Assistant Secretary, Consular, Public Diplomacy and Parliamentary Affairs Division (2007) and First Assistant Secretary, Americas and Europe Division (2000-01). He was Head of the Australian Delegation to the Law of the Sea Preparatory Commission from 1987 until 1988.
Mr Quinlan's overseas assignments have been as Deputy Head of Mission, Australian Embassy Washington DC (2005-07); High Commissioner to Singapore (2001-05); First Secretary, Australian Mission to the United Nations, New York (1981-85); Australian Deputy Permanent Delegate to UNESCO, Paris (1979-81); and Second Secretary in Dublin (1974-77). He was attached to the Economic Development Institute, World Bank in Washington D.C. (1984).
Mr Quinlan also served as Chief of Staff to the Minister for Trade (1993-94) and to the Minister for Industry, Science and Technology (1994-96).
Mr Quinlan was educated at the University of Newcastle and holds a Bachelor of Arts degree with honours. He also holds the honorary degree of Doctor of Letters (Hon DLitt Newc, 2007).
I can't actually think of too many negatives for Australia having a temporary seat at the UN.
Does anyone know how it actually works? Do we presently have an ambassador to the UN who will fill the role?
Is someone new appointed? Is this the role our Kev has been angling for? Would it compensate him for not regaining the PM position?
I will accept the criticism that I said that I would not contribute to this forum anymore.!
However I do read it.
I could not help myself.
If KRudd was given the job on the UN, then Jules has used $25 million of taxpayers money to
get rid of Kevin for her second shot at the title.!!!!!
Gee, you are so slow!!!
joea
The rest of us work our guts out while these parasites live the high life.
Rudd would love to be at the UN he could write essays and generally wallow in his own perceived importance at our expense.
I will accept the criticism that I said that I would not contribute to this forum anymore.!
What criticism? I don't remember reading your announcing that you would not contribute any more.I will accept the criticism that I said that I would not contribute to this forum anymore.!
What criticism? I don't remember reading your announcing that you would not contribute any more.
McLovin has advised that the role at the UN will be taken by our present Ambassador to the UN who (on reading his bio) seems well qualified for the position.
Hard to imagine that he would suddenly resign and the role be assigned to Mr Rudd, though I guess if they could do it to Harry Jenkins they can do it to a career diplomat.
Who cares, as long as it deflects the public eye from the main issues.And how much taxpayers money was bribed as charity to other nations to buy this temporary seat on the UN ?
Who cares, as long as it deflects the public eye from the main issues.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?