Lindsay Tanner was very credible and it showed, no pretence there, good on him and I hope he feels better for purging.....
+1.Just a shame they didn't make Tanner PM instead of Gillard.
If she said AA to AK, it wouldn't be a stutter.
...
There have been long-standing concerns that the high debt levels of Australian households left them vulnerable to an economic shock such as a sharp rise in the, currently low, 5.1 per cent unemployment rate
Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/business/t...mps-by-325b-20120927-26ngo.html#ixzz27lJ3ZlBC
Another good reason to sharply reduce immigration
CONSERVATIVE states are not responsible for big hikes in electricity prices and do not need to be threatened in a quest for ''cheap'' headlines, Resources Minister Martin Ferguson has said, just months after Prime Minister Julia Gillard made such claims.
UNION leader Paul Howes has hit out at Resources Minister Martin Ferguson, accusing him of repeatedly undermining the Gillard government.
Mr Howes said Mr Ferguson's contradiction of Julia Gillard on the source of power price rises should come as no surprise.
"Martin Ferguson bagging his own side, there's nothing new in that," he said.
I suspect he will follow the path of Lindsay Tanner or will be pushed.Well Doc, Ferguson has allways seemed to be a straight shooter.
Maybe he is getting fed up with the labor parties, pension and career before country, attitude.
Super is well and truely in their sights as widely reported by the media.They thinking of dipping their dirty hands into SMSF ...
We do not need a compensation scheme for SMSFs. If you don't know what you're doing and are at risk of being suckered into dodgy stuff, you shouldn't be running your own Fund.They thinking of dipping their dirty hands into SMSF ...
The federal government is examining plans to crack down on the $439 billion self-managed super sector by handing the corporate regulator sweeping powers to ban, suspend and impose conditions on do-it-yourself super savers.
The government is also examining plans to impose hundreds of dollars in levies for the average $470,000 DIY fund to establish a “last resort” compensation scheme for the sector in the event of a repeat of frauds such as the $176 million collapse of Trio Capital in 2009.
Useless post as always. You should stick to calling 16 year old girls stupid when going through a McDonald's driveway in that thread you started or advising people to stick with fixed interest investments. Hey or give a few more +1s here and there.We do not need a compensation scheme for SMSFs. If you don't know what you're doing and are at risk of being suckered into dodgy stuff, you shouldn't be running your own Fund.
Useless post as always. You should stick to calling 16 year old girls stupid when going through a McDonald's driveway in that thread you started or advising people to stick with fixed interest investments. Hey or give a few more +1s here and there.
The government is also examining plans to impose hundreds of dollars in levies for the average $470,000 DIY fund to establish a “last resort” compensation scheme for the sector in the event of a repeat of frauds such as the $176 million collapse of Trio Capital in 2009.
Federal Labor is already examining cutting as much as $15 billion in annual tax breaks from the rapidly expanding sector to help save its budget surplus.
http://www.afr.com/p/national/labor_plans_crackdown_on_smsfs_9sv1BxHITkDskEWDPgq5nL
NO another good reason to increase immigration, keep downward pressure on wages, therefore inflation. That in turn keeps the value in your currency, which also keeps a lid on inflation.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?