- Joined
- 30 June 2007
- Posts
- 7,200
- Reactions
- 1,226
They haven't been ignored at all. Governments do plenty to promote healthy lifestyle, but as explained, it's a dead end. People indulge unhealthy habits to self-medicate. You can't just take away 'medications' (read: coping mechanisms) and not expect major repurcussions. Why do kids risk their lives taking drugs at dance parties? It's the very same reason an adult might use alcohol or soft drinks.It makes me wonder why those responsible for health care do so little to reduce the lifestyle risks.
OK we have had a big anti smoking campaign (with great opposition by vested interests), but alcohol and obesity have been basically ignored.
They haven't been ignored at all. Governments do plenty to promote healthy lifestyle, but as explained, it's a dead end. People indulge unhealthy habits to self-medicate. You can't just take away 'medications' and not expect major repurcussions. Why do kids risk their lives taking drugs at dance parties? It's the very same reason an adult might drink excessively.
Nature has a good way to sort things up as us boys die significantly earlier than the ladies, and not only because we speed moreMedical science, with the exception of vaccines, has been over-rated as a source of human progress. Most of the gains in health and longevity (and quality of life) have come from public health measures such as clean water, clean(er) air, better food, and sewerage systems. I agree we are now addicted to (expensive) life-extending treatments of the normal symptoms of ageing - but as soon as we extend life-spans by a couple of years, we end up "suffering" from a new "epidemic" of age-related maladies like particular cancers, heart disease , arthritis or dementia. If you look at where the health dollar goes, it is overwhelming these diseases of age. The research dollar is similarly weighted to finding "cures" for these quite normal conditions of an ageing body (and I say this as someone with failing eye sight and hearing, numerous "pre-cancerous" skin lesions as well as dicky knees).
I'd love to see an unbiased cost-benefit analysis of both health care and medical research to see whether keeping us geriatrics alive for a few more years is a genuine benefit to society. Unfortunately for most posters here, old blokes would score rather badly I think but old women, because the social and economic benefits of grandmothers have been studied, would score better.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5137920/Not sure that's entirely true
In my view PHS is the actual tax rort that Labor should have gone to the last election with a plan to scrap completely.what is the general feeling on here?
Figures like these may cause a few folk who do not have private insurance into rethinking.
I've had health insurance
Wouldn't be without Health insurance.Received notification from the fund the insurance will increase by ..................0.9% this year. I can cope with that.
Only just now opened the snail mail I collected last Wednesday. Yup, I'm slack sometimes.
Wouldn't be without Health insurance.
We are with the biggest one here in WA and also have gap-saver which costs a bit extra each quarter, but then the Govt covers one third of that cost.
Hate it as it is an expensive annual cost which has cost us a fortune over the last 30y..and when we had one major accident with micro surgery etc, the golden top cover left us with a $2.5k out of pocket bill 15y ago. Not small amount then... but would you be without it..our answer is no..Means our out of pocket expenses are nil.
private health insurance is like chasing this red DOTIt makes me wonder why those responsible for health care do so little to reduce the lifestyle risks.
OK we have had a big anti smoking campaign (with great opposition by vested interests), but alcohol and obesity have been basically ignored.
Alcopops tax was rejected by the LNP and a sugar/salt/fat tax (or other measures to reduce these) have not seen the light of day in this government.
Part of the ageing population syndrome have been higher health costs, surely a greater emphasis on a healthier lifestyle should be essential to reducing those costs.
When our governments can force you an mRNA experiment killing here between 10k and 20k people in Australia ...pure stats on extra deaths..does anyone really believe the governments care about our health?
Can you link to those stats?When our governments can force you an mRNA experiment killing here between 10k and 20k people in Australia ...pure stats on extra
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?