IFocus
You are arguing with a Galah
- Joined
- 8 September 2006
- Posts
- 7,706
- Reactions
- 4,823
Or the companies are being shonky.
Or the companies are being shonky.
Only the pollies that have any clout, a lot just fill a seat untill they loose it.But it comes back to the politicians for letting them get away with it.
I wonder if there are any pollies in the pocket of the gas companies?
Go back a few pages - I posted about this one a while ago with figures.Amazing.
A while ago we were talking about WA's gas reservation policy and how there was no shortage of gas in the West.
Someone has dropped the ball apparently.
Just adding that wasn't to say "I told you so" it's more that the figures are there if anyone wants to know.Go back a few pages - I posted about this one a while ago with figures.
You are quite justified in saying "I told you so".Just adding that wasn't to say "I told you so" it's more that the figures are there if anyone wants to know.
And for ore mining, a tax per cubic metre of earth moved from initial state otherwise, we favor the rape of our resources instead of efficiency.Only the pollies that have any clout, a lot just fill a seat untill they loose it.
I would have thought the gas companies would pay a lot of tax, but as usual it is difficult to get big companies to pay any, they have whole dept's working on how to shift costs and money around.
They know much gas, iron ore, bauxite etc is sold by the shipping data, a tax by volume should be applied it is the only thing they can't fudge.
What is great with these is that they silently slice the sea birds and migratory birds life and feed the fish below ensuring cheaper seafood for all.Offshore wind farms in Gippsland a step closer?
- In short: Six offshore wind projects vying to secure a place in Australia's first offshore wind zone have been granted feasibility licences.
- The federal government's declared offshore wind zone is located in waters off Gippsland in Victoria's east.
- What's next? Companies behind the proposals now have an opportunity to undertake detailed assessments before submitting final plans.
Australia one step closer to generating electricity from offshore wind farms as projects receive feasibility licences
Federal Minister for Climate Change and Energy Chris Bowen officially unveils the first proponents to receive offshore wind farm feasibility licences.www.abc.net.au
They only get paid for what they ship and they know exactly how many tons are shipped, so putting a tax commensurate with the raw material shipped is easy.And for ore mining, a tax per cubic metre of earth moved from initial state otherwise, we favor the rape of our resources instead of efficiency.
So, if miners pay a tax on volume, they will pay $x per tonne or cubic metre, how do you determine x?They only get paid for what they ship and they know exactly how many tons are shipped, so putting a tax commensurate with the raw material shipped is easy.
Then the miners or the LNG producers have to claim back their offsets, which if it is anything like a PAYG taxpayer goes, best of luck with that.
The resource companies will then say it isn't worth developing the resource, we say fine because you pay us flck all for it anyway.
By benchmarking what the market price as as opposed to recovery costs.So, if miners pay a tax on volume, they will pay $x per tonne or cubic metre, how do you determine x?
Should it be the same for coal, iron ore , uranium and lithium?
From the evil Murdoch press.Yeah, there's a legal story here hence the cautious wording of my previous post.
It's going to take quite some explaining as to how it went so badly wrong. This wasn't a "normal" breakdown by any means.
Knowing volume of soil moved is possible easily from satellite or drone relief survey, that is the way the miners do already.So, if miners pay a tax on volume, they will pay $x per tonne or cubic metre, how do you determine x?
Should it be the same for coal, iron ore , uranium and lithium?
I suggest x should be based on the spot price of the mineral or gas when the resource is exported. Sure companies can hold up shipments until the spot price falls, but then they could be in trouble with their customers for breach of contract if the shipments don't arrive on time.
The government is allowing CO2 into the artesian basin, so that the CO2 does not go into the atmosphere..everyone knows the CO2 in the atmosphere is leading to acid oceans...Is it true Tanya pilbersek gave the go ahead for glencores idea of pumping liquefied carbon dioxide into aquifers?
Are they not worried about the explosive outcomes that may have?
Am I missing something here, because it sounds like Labor are just fully retarded at this point. I had hopes, but they are literally the most stupid pack to date.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?