Australian (ASX) Stock Market Forum

The future of energy generation and storage

Now I know why I don't see EVs at night on the road.....cheers
they run on batteries and need power from some where ?
are windmills and solar going to provide that?

batteries for the record as well are toxic and require numerous toxic materials from the ground
the EV marker are just new shiney things sold to an idiot based consumer markert


Einstien
 
Awesome landlord pays electric bills for tenants
thats great your oldies are still paying the family electricity bill!
try moving out one day and experience the real world! youll soon find that leftist ideologies dont work and never have as history points out
 
Yes, just ask "Value Collector" who charges his Tesla car batteries using his house solar panels and gets free "fuel".

I am looking forward to joining the program.
and they are another usefull idiot?
Lenin's terminology!
as all leftists are!
living in some fantasy fictitious land!
thats based on history and current theory
 
That's the problem, when you get journalists, telling the technical people how to do it, Labor hasn't done a backflip for no reason, they have been told the reality. ?


The private sector will close the coal power stations when it suits them, not when the media say they will close them and the journalists will be quick to blame the Govt if there isn't any installed plant and rolling blackouts are the result.
But the media don't let a good story, get in the way of the reality.
It's all good chook food for the muppets.
The other plus with Snowy Hydro owning it, if there is a power shortage for any reason, Snowy has the ability to recharge Snowy2.0 with their own generation, rather than being at the whim of the market generators.
Oh by the way, they wouldn't be the ones Michael West is quoting, would they?
 
Last edited:
That's the problem, when you get journalists, telling the technical people how to do it, Labor hasn't done a backflip for no reason, they have been told the reality. ?


The private sector will close the coal power station when it suits them, not when the media say they will close them and the journalists will be quick to blame the Govt if there isn't any installed plant and rolling blackout are the result.
But the media don't let a good story, get in the way of the reality.
It's all good chook food for the muppets.

Yep, having government owned stations act as a moderator to price gouging by the private sector.

I'm surprised the Federal Coalition has gone down this path, I suspect they intend to sell it off at an opportune time.
 
I'm surprised the Federal Coalition has gone down this path, I suspect they intend to sell it off at an opportune time.
I would be surprised, it is too usefull for Snowy Hydro IMO.
Also it will only run when required, so not really suitable for a private generator, a big battery would be better value for money for the privates IMO.
No moving parts, no workers, no fuel. :xyxthumbs
 
That's the problem, when you get journalists, telling the technical people how to do it, Labor hasn't done a backflip for no reason, they have been told the reality. ?


The private sector will close the coal power stations when it suits them, not when the media say they will close them and the journalists will be quick to blame the Govt if there isn't any installed plant and rolling blackouts are the result.
But the media don't let a good story, get in the way of the reality.
It's all good chook food for the muppets.
The other plus with Snowy Hydro owning it, if there is a power shortage for any reason, Snowy has the ability to recharge Snowy2.0 with their own generation, rather than being at the whim of the market generators.
Oh by the way, they wouldn't be the ones Michael West is quoting, would they?
Not sure but you're quoting the Guardian lol
 
I would be surprised, it is too usefull for Snowy Hydro IMO.
Also it will only run when required, so not really suitable for a private generator, a big battery would be better value for money for the privates IMO.
No moving parts, no workers, no fuel. :xyxthumbs
Wasn't that the gist of the story...that the technology could be obsolete before it's necessary?
 
What gas turbines, I dont think so, why would that be the case?
Woodley points out that the Australian Energy Market Operator (AEMO) shows that a supply gap in NSW won’t occur till 2030. ‘’By then there will be all sorts of new storage and generation options, regardless it only takes three years or so to build a gas plant like this so we don’t need to even consider proceeding with construction till 2027 or so”.
 
You will probably find the AEMO projection, is based on everything going to plan, youve been around long enough to know with old worn out plant, that never happens.
@Smurf1976 has highlighted even recently how close to the wind things can be and that is before the 2,000MW station is closed, Woodley doesnt have to face the music if he is wrong, thats why Labor are sticking with the gas turbines.
The 2,000MW that is closing down, is at call generation, the proposed generation going in is renewable intermitent and batteries.
 
You will probably find the AEMO projection, is based on everything going to plan, youve been around long enough to know with old worn out plant, that never happens.
@Smurf1976 has highlighted even recently how close to the wind things can be and that is before the 2,000MW station is closed, Woodley doesnt have to face the music if he is wrong, thats why Labor are sticking with the gas turbines.
8 years is a long time in politics
 
Top