- Joined
- 14 February 2005
- Posts
- 15,289
- Reactions
- 17,503
I just found an interesting article from the International hydro association that mentions PNG has untapped Hydro sources of potentially 15,000 MWH, and currently only has 250 MWH of installed capacity.
Origin Energy were seriously interested in the idea some time ago and did some decent work on it. They were looking at 1200 MW for base load operation as the initial stage with transmission to Qld.
Hydro is often dismissed on the basis that Australia is dry and flat but, as someone who has a list of possible sites in every state, I'd argue that there's certainly potential to develop more of it and use it to fill the problem of wind and solar "droughts" which presently have no easy fix.
I don't advocate a "dam the lot" approach, there are some sites which definitely shouldn't be developed in my view for conservation or other reasons, but there's certainly potential to do more than has been done thus far as long as a sensible approach is taken rather than an ideological one.
A distinction needs to be made there between financial and technical.I'm surprised that there isn't a least the option to divert the power to water heating before it goes back into the grid. Or maybe there is but people preferred the feed in tariff ?
Origin Energy were seriously interested in the idea some time ago and did some decent work on it. They were looking at 1200 MW for base load operation as the initial stage with transmission to Qld.
Hydro is often dismissed on the basis that Australia is dry and flat but, as someone who has a list of possible sites in every state, I'd argue that there's certainly potential to develop more of it and use it to fill the problem of wind and solar "droughts" which presently have no easy fix.
I don't advocate a "dam the lot" approach, there are some sites which definitely shouldn't be developed in my view for conservation or other reasons, but there's certainly potential to do more than has been done thus far as long as a sensible approach is taken rather than an ideological one.
It hasnt taken long to move on from coal.Interesting perspective on where we should be going with regard to using gas a fuel.
The analysis of how much money the Morrison Government is being asked to pony up to support the current Gas industry is scary. Well worth read.
Phasing out gas would benefit Australian manufacturers and households
Richard Denniss
The Australian government should allow the electricity industry to wean itself off gas
Rather than drill new fracking wells into prime farmland, the quickest, cleanest and most economically efficient way to boost the supply of gas in Australia is to stop wasting it.
According to the Australian Industry (AI) Group’s budget submission, “Ramping up support for manufacturers to transition from gas to electricity – from gas boilers to heat pumps – would both cut costs and allow them to lower emissions with onsite or offsite renewables.” I couldn’t agree more. And there is literally no better time for the federal government to support private investment than in the middle of a recession in which many factories, and many suppliers, have spare capacity.
https://www.theguardian.com/comment...nefit-australian-manufacturers-and-households
Interesting perspective on where we should be going with regard to using gas a fuel.
I prefer gas hot water. And cooking with gas.
It hasnt taken long to move on from coal.
I prefer gas hot water.
We have done that, the wife hates cooking with inductive and is always lamenting the loss of the gas cooktop.Does gas have a daily connection charge?
If so, once you get solar you are probably better off ditching the gas and getting electric set to a timer to heat during the day to soak up your excess production.
so not only are you saving money by utilising your own solar production, but you will be saving on connection/service fees.
I understand what you're saying but I'd argue that a quality heat pump properly installed will match or beat gas hot water on any realistic measure.
Trouble is, well the plumber just about fell over when I said that's what I want and will happily pay for. He had to have a look before giving me a price since, it seems, basically nobody actually wants anything done by the book and the "standard" quote suits the rest who want cheap and then complain that it unsurprisingly doesn't work perfectly.
I get what you're saying, just pointing out that solar and heat pumps can be done properly, the problem being that all too often cheap and nasty is done in practice then it either performs badly or fails outright.
Origin Energy were seriously interested in the idea some time ago and did some decent work on it. They were looking at 1200 MW for base load operation as the initial stage with transmission to Qld.
Hydro is often dismissed on the basis that Australia is dry and flat but, as someone who has a list of possible sites in every state, I'd argue that there's certainly potential to develop more of it and use it to fill the problem of wind and solar "droughts" which presently have no easy fix.
I don't advocate a "dam the lot" approach, there are some sites which definitely shouldn't be developed in my view for conservation or other reasons, but there's certainly potential to do more than has been done thus far as long as a sensible approach is taken rather than an ideological one.
All too true.
I have a lovely warm hydronic heating system. It runs from a gas fired boiler.
For lots of reasons, financially and environmentally, I'd like to switch to a using a heat pump instead of the boiler.
Unfortunately it isn't as easy as that. Frank discussions with disinterested hydronic experts says that heat pumps arn't efficient at producing the very hot water the system needs, that my current radiators won't work efficiently on lower temperature water and that these factors aren't going to change.
Rather sad.
I have heard (read) Smurf mention that I believe, the higher temp you need to raise something too the less Effective heat pumps are.
If you live in a really cold location, direct burning of gas is one of the best methods of heating, unless as I said you have your own solar and can store the heat produced in the middle of the day (hot water system).
I have to many kids and now their gfs living here. I had electric before but was sick of cold showers.Does gas have a daily connection charge?
If so, once you get solar you are probably better off ditching the gas and getting electric set to a timer to heat during the day to soak up your excess production.
so not only are you saving money by utilising your own solar production, but you will be saving on connection/service fees.
I see a lot of cheap and nasties on the roofs of various dwellings.I understand what you're saying but I'd argue that a quality heat pump properly installed will match or beat gas hot water on any realistic measure.
Trouble is, well the plumber just about fell over when I said that's what I want and will happily pay for. He had to have a look before giving me a price since, it seems, basically nobody actually wants anything done by the book and the "standard" quote suits the rest who want cheap and then complain that it unsurprisingly doesn't work perfectly.
I get what you're saying, just pointing out that solar and heat pumps can be done properly, the problem being that all too often cheap and nasty is done in practice then it either performs badly or fails outright.
I have to many kids and now their gfs living here. I had electric before but was sick of cold showers.
I don't care about money. But will switch if made aware of a decent product.
It will be a shock when its just me and the wife. Another 15 years to go anyway.It’s only me and my wife at home, so one full tank a day is enough for us.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?