Julia
In Memoriam
- Joined
- 10 May 2005
- Posts
- 16,986
- Reactions
- 1,973
Let's not assume that such rigorous saving went on for half a lifetime, as some of you seem to be doing.Whilst acknowledging that home ownership is entirely possible if you wish to make the sort of choices a couple of posters have outlined - I doubt that many would want to exist that way,
Or some people choose to do this sort of thing, if that's what appeals to them, at a different stage of their life.Not many people lie on their deathbed and wish they'd saved more money or worked longer hours, but quite a few regret the lack of time spent with loved ones, or the experiences not enjoyed and places never visited.
Perhaps consider that not everyone wants to have children. Not necessarily a choice between having a home or children, just no desire to procreate.I think the number of children a family has makes a huge difference to its ability to afford housing also. It's much easier for a DINK couple to buy a home, than for one with a few children, especially if private schooling is chosen. Again, it's a choice - but many people would put having their children waaay in front of owning their home.
(snip)
Whilst acknowledging that home ownership is entirely possible if you wish to make the sort of choices a couple of posters have outlined - I doubt that many would want to exist that way, and it's certainly not a way of life I'd like to see my kids live. I've seen too many friends and relatives die before they get the chance to enjoy the fruits of their labour to advocate half living your life in the present. Not many people lie on their deathbed and wish they'd saved more money or worked longer hours, but quite a few regret the lack of time spent with loved ones, or the experiences not enjoyed and places never visited.
I think the number of children a family has makes a huge difference to its ability to afford housing also. It's much easier for a DINK couple to buy a home, than for one with a few children, especially if private schooling is chosen. Again, it's a choice - but many people would put having their children waaay in front of owning their home. I guess it's just a matter of priorities. It's not just a case of what is possible, but what is desirable. If owning means a substantial decline in lifestyle, more and more people will choose to rent instead. At the end of the day there's a limit to how much young people will be prepared to pay for a roof over their heads.
Fair enough, but I doubt that the majority of the younger population want to work 2 jobs and do without for a decade in order to get into their own home, if they can rent something comparable and enjoy a nice standard of life. My comments were in relation to the affordability of housing for the next crop of first home owners - not a judgement on what you and Bill have chosen to do in the past. Clearly it has worked for you, and you're happy with the decisions you made - but that's kinda irrelevant to the young ones who are now weighing up whether such sacrifice is worth it for them. My post was directed at the general topic, and not towards you or your choices in particular, but more as an example of what may be required to get into one's own home and whether it's worth it - for others.Let's not assume that such rigorous saving went on for half a lifetime, as some of you seem to be doing.
Probably about ten years, amongst which time was the taking of risk and opportunity in pretty equal measure.
viz references often from Tech/A about seeing where the opportunity exists and making the most of it.
So far I've had plenty of years to enjoy the fruits of my labour and anticipate many more to come.
Or some people choose to do this sort of thing, if that's what appeals to them, at a different stage of their life.
I don't believe either Bill or I are advocating anyone else should necessarily emulate the choices we made.
My earlier comments were simply as a result of being a bit tired of constantly being told how easy we had it in every respect.
Perhaps consider that not everyone wants to have children. Not necessarily a choice between having a home or children, just no desire to procreate.
Well done, great story KJM. I had to marry a thrifty woman to curb my spending...
Hows the prop gig going?
CanOz
Haha so long as you still get to have a bit of fun
I got through to the trial and passed that ok - i was asked to stay on another month but i declined. HFT isn't for me - I just couldn't get into it as much as my regular trading. Then again, i was trading for 6 hours after working an 8 hour day so that may have been a factor.
To
prawn_86
CanOz
So_Cynical - well done of the property in the Philippines
I have also been looking at property in Asia. Mainly in Phuket, Thailand.
1) Ownership - my biggest concern is how you have to set up a fake board of directors (which you still control) to purchase an apartment. Houses are very difficult to purchase, and are usually done in the wives name.
2) Collecting income - don't trust them. Skimming off the top
3) Change of Government, could equal a change in property laws, not for the better.
I do wonder how my kids are going to fare with the home ownership dilemma - although several years off.
Whilst acknowledging that home ownership is entirely possible if you wish to make the sort of choices a couple of posters have outlined - I doubt that many would want to exist that way, and it's certainly not a way of life I'd like to see my kids live. I've seen too many friends and relatives die before they get the chance to enjoy the fruits of their labour to advocate half living your life in the present. Not many people lie on their deathbed and wish they'd saved more money or worked longer hours, but quite a few regret the lack of time spent with loved ones, or the experiences not enjoyed and places never visited. .
There are many places that are run by expats that have partnerships with the Thais, so try to find one of them. Siam Real Estate was one of the better R.E. Agencies around a couple of years ago...that could have changed. As far as expat ownership is concerned, you are allowed to own up to three condos in a complex as a foreigner in Thailand. There is some geopolitical risk, but the Thais are quite settled into their version of democracy...the King is the caveat though.
CanOz
Location will be a factor, but some Thai friends of mine were complaining that the Condos they owned in BKK were struggling to give them a return. I'd say Pattaya is as bad.
The prob is the influx of large amounts of new Condos, so people can always get the latest and greatest which depresses the price of the older ones, and lowers the rent you can expect to receive.
I'm hoping to team up with a friend in Thailand to build some student accommodation near the new University being built in his home town. His dad has quite a few contacts in the area and local Govt, so that makes a lot of the issues of investing in Asia easier. always helps to know who's into Chivas or Remey Martin
If / When I make the move to Asia I think I'll just rent. Looking at the rental market in most cities, it seems the yields there are as bad as a lot of Australia, so I'd prefer to have my money in assets producing 7% returns and paying rent at 4% and avoiding the holding costs of property. I also like the idea of being able to move around as time goes by and sorta be a nomadic back packer with a base of operations. Is easier to do this when you're single.
I'm in my late 20s and can relate to a lot of what Julia and Bill have been saying. You need to make some sacrifices but the funny thing is, it's really not that hard.
On a single income (with no support from government, friends or family) I have my own PPOR and an IP. All paid for by my own savings and investments (that i made myself with my own money).
If I can do it - anyone can do it. No excuses. All it takes is some discipline and some small sacrifices.
I got through to the trial and passed that ok - i was asked to stay on another month but i declined
A person on an average income paying off a below average mortgage by the time they are 30 has done damn well. A $200k mortgage on a $50k salary is pretty tight.
Stay for another month of trial or for in-house? Just curious as I start soon.
Fine. I have already made clear that I wasn't suggesting anyone should regard what Bill or I did as any sort of recommendation. Some people feel very strongly about home ownership, not just from a financial point of view but more for the knowledge that it's yours to do with it what you wish.Fair enough, but I doubt that the majority of the younger population want to work 2 jobs and do without for a decade in order to get into their own home, if they can rent something comparable and enjoy a nice standard of life.
I understand what you're saying, but I recall clearly my father's accounts of living through the Great Depression and how incredibly difficult it was. No social welfare support in those days. What a far cry from the middle class welfare so generously doled out as vote buying these days.Again, fair enough. I know it's annoying to be told "you had it sooooo easy compared to my generation" - and I daresay every generation has said that to their elders at one point. I remember bitterly complaining to my parents that they had it easier than me, and now my kids complain that I had things easier than them, and so it shall no doubt repeat endlessly.
Almost certainly they will. It seems to be the pattern now.I do think I had some things (like home affordability) easier than my children will have, but on the flip-side they have other aspects of life much easier than did I. One can only hope that those young upstarts that like to blame the baby boomers for everything are one day facing the same attacks from their grandchildren's generation
Congratulations, KJM. Really well done. Good for you. What a great example to set.On a single income (with no support from government, friends or family) I have my own PPOR and an IP. All paid for by my own savings and investments (that i made myself with my own money).
Now how hard would it really be to save 29K for a deposit and borrow $260,000 and pay that off? According to UBanks calculator it would cost $1,455 P/M to pay off this loan at their current rate of 5.37%. $1,455 works out at $363 P/W. I can tell you now I would definitely be able to pay that off on my own even with a Coles salary.
If I can do it - anyone can do it. No excuses. All it takes is some discipline and some small sacrifices.
What I have been doing:
- 2nd hand furniture for my home. Not the most 'modern' style but looks great
- No alcohol at bars and clubs except on rare occasions (buy from the bottle-o before hand instead)
- No daily coffees
- Only occassionaly dining out (once a week usually)
- Kept the same phone for 3-4 years and bought on contract to pay over time
- Drove the same, beat up old car for 8 years that cost me $3500
- No personal loans or credit card debt (except where the credit card is paid off by the end of the month)
- No designer clothing
- Travelled; been overseas every year for the last 5 years. Ski trips for a week every year for 7 years. At least 2-3 holidays a year interstate
What my friends have been doing:
- Expensive cars
- Travelling extensively
- Spending a lot at bars and clubs on the weekends
- Coffees and store bought lunches daily (you're paying $4 for some beans and hot water...)
- Lots of designer clothing ($450 jeans... really? LOL)
- Eating out a few days a week
What I have now:
- A positive cashflow IP
- A PPOR with mortgage repayments at 30% of my weekly earnings (thanks in part to the IP)
- A nice mercedes (2nd hand of course)
What my friends have now:
- Personal/credit card debt
- Downsized cars
- No assets
The best thing about all this is that I don't feel like I've missed out on a thing. I've never not been able to go out with my friends on trips. I've gone to all the events they've held - never had any issues.
You can do it!
Lets see
$24500 gone just there, more than half your Gross wage of $42,000 P/A for a full time employee...and you haven't paid tax, private health or contributed to super, paid the gas/power, food, clothes the net and phone.
- $17460 PA mortgage
- $2500 PA rates and unit fees
- $1000 PA insurance
- $3500 PA for a car that you don't drive much (just to coles
)
Even with a 10% deposit i doubt the bank would lend you the money.
Anyone who cant get more than 6% on their money would be best advised to do that.
Those who can would be Crazy!!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?