- Joined
- 5 October 2011
- Posts
- 896
- Reactions
- 0
Excellent post RandR and that's exactly what it's all about. When you pay it off there will be no more mortgage or rent payments to be made and that is absolute bliss. In the mean time you can do it up as you like and live without the threat of being thrown out at an inconvenient time. Cheers mate, I wish you all the best.
You guys have got to stop boasting this old school mentality. How is having a mortgage for hundreds of thousands of dollars on what should be considered a LIABILITY a good idea? Everyone should be preaching to buy an investment property from the get go(obviously pick your timing). You pay rent for 300$ a week, have all the benefits of a cashflow positive property(not my fault if some idiots choose to negative gear) including the ability to write things off against the house, all the while paying down the mortgage far quicker than if you lived there forking it all out yourself?
Owning your own house is merely a luxury. You are going to progress much faster putting it on hold. Everyone on here talks about sacrifice, how about sacrificing the security of owning your own home for a few years so you generate an actual investment that can then help pay down your dream LIABILITY.
House prices stagnant to down.
+1. So much more to owning one's own home than the economic considerations. For me, the peace of mind, the pleasure of creating an attractive and comfortable environment, is priceless.It's very much of a lifestyle choice and not a financial choice driving my position, personally.
Rent and invest is on paper the better financial move, but I want the security and peace of mind that comes with not having anyone to answer to about how I live.
+1. So much more to owning one's own home than the economic considerations. For me, the peace of mind, the pleasure of creating an attractive and comfortable environment, is priceless.
It's very much of a lifestyle choice and not a financial choice driving my position, personally.
Rent and invest is on paper the better financial move, but I want the security and peace of mind that comes with not having anyone to answer to about how I live.
+1. So much more to owning one's own home than the economic considerations. For me, the peace of mind, the pleasure of creating an attractive and comfortable environment, is priceless.
+1
gg
It's very much of a lifestyle choice and not a financial choice driving my position, personally.
Rent and invest is on paper the better financial move, but I want the security and peace of mind that comes with not having anyone to answer to about how I live.
+1. So much more to owning one's own home than the economic considerations. For me, the peace of mind, the pleasure of creating an attractive and comfortable environment, is priceless.
+1
gg
+ 2 (wife and I)
young-gun, when I was a renter back in the 80's I was asked to vacate a property when it was in 2 weeks before Christmas, this was in Manly/Sydney. I could just see us now, an older couple looking for accommodation right at the time when everything is taken or booked out, no thanks.
Bill your example I imagine is a rare one. If you were asked to vacate before the lease was up then(providing the laws were the same) the land-lord is required to find and provide you with alternate accommodation. Perhaps this wasn't the case back then.
.....
I count myself lucky I got in just as the boom was taking off in 97. There's no way I'd want to shackle myself with the kind of mortgages people are taking out these days.
.....
If that's steady income, and assuming that 55k is including super, you'd be eligibile for a loan of about $250-$275k. Property of about $285k with a 5% deposit of about $14500, capitalising LMI for a total LVR of about 96.5%. That would factor in $1200/mth living expenses by the bank - mine are about $1750 as shown above.
Payments would be about 46% of net income in the first year at current rates, well into 'mortgage stress' territory obviously, but for the first 5 or 6 years of the loan if you treat that as your savings + investments as well as housing costs, that's not terribly over budget. At the end of year 5, assuming growth over the period of 2.5% p.a. (not a given, but seems pretty reasonable to me that over a 5 year window a decently located property would at least keep up with inflation) you'd be below 80% LVR without making any extra repayments by the end of year 5. If you had no capital growth and didn't contribute any wage growth to the mortgage, you're looking at 10 years.
http://smh.domain.com.au/list-sydneys-10-cheapest-suburbs-for-houses-20121022-280yy.htmlBlackett $232,000
Tregear $237,000
Lethbridge $238,500
Whalan $248,000
Bidwill $257,500
Shalvey $265,000
Emerton $270,000
Hebersham $276,750
Warragamba $295,000
Werrington $297,000
The 10 Greater Sydney suburbs with median prices below $300,000, based on sales for the six months to August 31, 2012. Source: Australian Property Monitors
consider 250k a decent amount to buy a place in Brisbane.
Fantastic post overall, and well done with the detail.
The problem with these nation wide debates is people from different cities will have very different opinions. You consider 250k a decent amount to buy a place in Brisbane, but in Sydney 250k is buying you rubbish. There are only 3 suburbs in greater Sydney that 250k will buy a median house.
For example, look at Sydneys cheapest suburbs.
These suburbs are all ~50km + from the CBD. With a commute time to the CBD of 1 hour plus in peak hour.
Obviously you can pick up some apartments closer to the city, and the cheapest properties in other suburbs will fall below that 250k mark, but overall its slim pickings.
The cheapest median house price within 20km of the CBD is Granville with a median price of $430,000, and at the moment, there are no places (houses or units) available in Granville for under 250,000
OK show us a budget.
55k with a HECs debt, but a house.
(Gotta love these rich people who haven't budgeted since the 1990s try and write a budget threads)
...So using your figures, a person earning above the median salary in Australia of 55k, can only buy a median house in the 3 worst suburbs in greater Sydney, and can't get anything in the cheapest suburb within 20km of the CBD.
It shows how there is a big disconnect between the wages being earned, and the house you can afford to buy. I actually find it a great example to illustrate that on average, the Sydney housing market is skewed.
The fact is it costs more there because people have paid it or are paying it.
And that's the essence. Simple market forces.
I have a cousin in Epping whose home has just gone onto the market for $1.5M. The agent has assured her she will get close to this.
The area is very pleasant, peaceful and leafy, close to the station.
The house is original Federation style, always requires heaps of ongoing work, but very attractive if you like that older style.
However, it has only three bedrooms, one bathroom, and no air conditioning or even ceiling fans!!
And that's the essence. Simple market forces.
I have a cousin in Epping whose home has just gone onto the market for $1.5M. The agent has assured her she will get close to this.
The area is very pleasant, peaceful and leafy, close to the station.
The house is original Federation style, always requires heaps of ongoing work, but very attractive if you like that older style.
However, it has only three bedrooms, one bathroom, and no air conditioning or even ceiling fans!!
Hi Maffu - there are a few things that I should clear up.
My post was written in response to this one by Mrmagoo
The 55k single income figure came from that statement. The median full-time employment income from the last census was a good bit higher than ~$1050/week.
On top of that, nearly 60% of Australians are married or in a de-facto relationship according to last census. Homes just aren't priced for single people to purchase and pay off on their own, dual income families have been the majority for a long time now.
If you are single, you can expect to be able to afford half of what a couple can afford. If you earn less than the median, you can expect to buy a house in the lower half of the market. If you are single, borrowing with 1 income AND earn less than the median Australian wage, what can you really expect to buy on your own? Studio/1 BR apartments would be geared at that market, 2 bed 2 bath places would be geared at 2 or more borrowers/residents.
Whilst income figures are rather difficult to rely on, I daresay that the median salary in Sydney is higher than just about anywhere in the country for a non-resources worker. It certainly is in my field (finance), where I could expect 10-25% more money in the same position, as well as access to higher paid roles in the industry that don't exist outside Sydney & Melbourne.
The fact is it costs more there because people have paid it or are paying it.
The Australian median wage is actually much lower than 55k, as the workforce moves more and more to casual work and contract work, the full time median wage reflects a smaller and smaller proportion of the actual workforce each year. According to the 2011 census data, Australia's median household income is $64,168. So only a touch higher than the example of 55k per week we just used. So again, that shows that the median family in Sydney can not afford to buy a median house in Sydney, in fact they can't even afford to buy the cheapest house within 20km, and can only afford to live in the absolute cheapest ghetto area in Sydney.
Not sure if it's still true, but I remember reading an article by Michael Pussey a good many years ago and he was saying that only around 30% of people earn the avg or more. At that time the median was something like $125~ a week less than the average.
Possibly with the casualisation of work the average will be even more skewed to the higher earners???
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?