tech/a
No Ordinary Duck
- Joined
- 14 October 2004
- Posts
- 20,445
- Reactions
- 6,469
Ive had considerable hdings in property fr over
15 years
For the last 12 mths I've been in the process of liquidating debt.
Un winding my debt in property has been my main priority.
Nearly there!
Will still hold property for passive income but won't carry debt related to it.
For me this may alter if developement of some freehold properties becomes
Financially viable.
Until then my view is to be as debt free as possible going forward.
Cash-flow and liquidity is now and will continue to be king in these
More difficult economic times.
Tech, you have spoken of unwinding/ liquidating/de-leveraging your debt a couple of times over the past 6 months. Is this because you also see a disturbing path ahead for aussie RE? Or are you simply protecting yourself in the event of a bit of turbulence that you think will blow over in the near future(12-36 months)?
Y/G
I can't see the point in holding debt if it's not earning you income.
If I'm just collecting interest for a bank then more the fool I am.
I hold the debt they hold the security and I hold all the risk for no or little income.
As for the future.
I see a long flat spot in all areas of investment.
Business is tough,so too property and commodities.
Inflation will return and when it does ----- will be with vengeance.
Perhaps 3-5 years.
When it does you won't want to be on the wrong side of interest rates!
Quoted for truth. Agree 100%.
Let s put what I said into context.... so it was not just the contribution, but a load of people focus on the tax rates for super at 15%
when it may be higher than their non super tax rates....plus why lock it into super until retirement.
I did not state the obvious, but there is also a risk with numerous changes in the legislation. There always seems to be someone with their eye on that bonanza, and wanting to get their hands on it. Like swan for instance, taking any balance under $2000 that may be dormant, and turfing it into general revenue.
How would you feel about the unions running the superfunds, in light of how they manage union funds for members?
Now they have changed the Auditor requirements, basically it will only be the larger Auditors to take their share of the mum and dad superfunds in the future. It is moving that way now. I would not be surprised if at some stage they cancelled the DIY superfunds, and made them turn it over to the bigger players.
my earlier post...........
"Wonder how many people are still pouring their money into super, and salary sacrificing under these adverse conditions. I am also surprised so many people still think only of the lower tax rates, as their reason for putting more of their hard earned into super. They have not kept up to date with the lower income tax rates. I think the average tax rate for income around $35,000 is now just under 10%, and around 20% for $50,000. Yet they will pay up for a contribution, paying 15% tax up front before the contribution earns any income, and they are stuck in the super funds until retirement age."
Tech, Pav or anyone else.. What would be your advice for people that are looking to purchase a house for PPOR when it isn't that much more of a jump in price from renting. I understand that prices may trend sideways or whatever else they want to do but do you think it is worth at least putting that dead money (rent) towards a house anyway?
Wilkens
Tech, Pav or anyone else.. What would be your advice for people that are looking to purchase a house for PPOR when it isn't that much more of a jump in price from renting. I understand that prices may trend sideways or whatever else they want to do but do you think it is worth at least putting that dead money (rent) towards a house anyway?
Wilkens
I was referring to before the above costs, although I have already considered what they would look like. I know that what I am talking about is viewed purely as an investment would not be very successful but I think a PPOR is more than that, capital gains come more as a benefit of the transaction.Is this before or after you include initial transaction costs, extra insurance, rates, wear and tear etc.
Y/G
I can't see the point in holding debt if it's not earning you income.
If I'm just collecting interest for a bank then more the fool I am.
I hold the debt they hold the security and I hold all the risk for no or little income.
As for the future.
I see a long flat spot in all areas of investment.
Business is tough,so too property and commodities.
Inflation will return and when it does ----- will be with vengeance.
Perhaps 3-5 years.
When it does you won't want to be on the wrong side of interest rates!
Naturally, but are you saying that you were only holding investments in hope of capital growth? If not then they would have been generating you some income, no? My confusion simply comes from thinking that you wouldn't have ever tied your money up in something that wasn't returning a decent %p/a in the first place.
Fixed rates below 6% for 3-5 years should give you some clues as to the future direction. If you cannot make those low rates profitable for you, then you should probably forget about using credit.
Just altered the wording Kincella This is how I would have expressed it---not that its right just my view on your wording.
I have some theories....
One can use an offset account, effectively not paying any interest on a home or investment loan, but at the same time in receipt of a much higher interest rate, than you would receive on deposits.
Most of the higher deposit rates on offer are only for 3-5 months, then they revert to the standard rates
I would only put deposits with those that have the government guarantee .
I have been earning 5.85 - 6.10% with e savers, but once the honeymoon period ends, you cannot get similar rates by opening another account with the same bank.
I am looking at a double bonanza,,,,I get a new loan rate at 5.4 - 5.7% even on commercial loans, and I have offset accounts, effectively earning the same rate, but for the life of the loan, not just a honeymoon period.
I pay substantially less interest on that part of the loan that is not offset, which frees up capital to apply to pay down the loan balance, much faster and quicker than if the offset was not in place.
Why would you sell properties, when you know they will bounce back in 2 years or less, and will remain stable in the meantime. All the capital costs involved in selling, then buying back, means you are giving away your profit and gains.
Applying short term actions against a long term investment is not smart investing.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?