- Joined
- 3 July 2009
- Posts
- 27,649
- Reactions
- 24,553
Melbourne overpriced to begin with.
Adelaide has just had close to 23% increase in 4 years.
Brisbane has just been flooded.
Just like shares ..... ya gotta know when to buy. Would I buy a house in these (metro) areas now? Ummmmmmmm ..... nope. Would I buy a house in "CERTAIN" areas ..... you betcha. But I am repeating myself yet again ....... Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Melbourne overpriced to begin with.
Adelaide has just had close to 23% increase in 4 years.
Brisbane has just been flooded.
Just like shares ..... ya gotta know when to buy. Would I buy a house in these (metro) areas now? Ummmmmmmm ..... nope. Would I buy a house in "CERTAIN" areas ..... you betcha. But I am repeating myself yet again ....... Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
I have to agree with you trainspotter, average wages are not going to go down(unless you have a Greek situation) So therefore there are some great opportunities poping up.
There are some great locations being sold at low prices.
Actually I've been looking at buying a house in Williamstown (Melbourne, well-known beach area in the inner west) and I'm noticing some nice prices there in comparison to the rest of the market.
If I'm able to get things in order and ensure I'm not exposing myself, I may just have to move down there!
Brisbane has just been flooded.
So the city was flooded, and there has been employment generated by the rebuilding and the insurance dollar, and consumption increase due to purchasing replacement items etc.
Why has housing in the areas not affected by the flooding (ie the houses that sustained no damage) decreased too?
Wouldn't a supply and demand scenario support higher prices in these areas?
Any other excuses for Brisbane's pathetic property market that are credible?
MW
LOL ........ I see you have not had your Optirectumotomy operation yet ?
THE strong Aussie has pushed Adelaide into the top 20 list of the world's most expensive cities, says the Economist Intelligence Unit's Worldwide Cost of Living survey.
...
the high dollar had made all five Australian cities costlier than major international cities such as London, Rome, New York, Los Angeles, Berlin, Hong Kong, Beijing and Shanghai.
Slightly tangential to the property market but I had a good chuckle about this...
http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/busin...ity-in-the-world/story-e6fredj3-1226270757603
No doubt the high dollar is influencing this but really, you have to wonder how sustainable it is to have Adelaide as more expensive than the other cities mentioned above. Something's gotta give.
I like your eyes exactly where they are
But, still, I see no reason as to why the floods should have caused prices in unaffected areas to follow suit, when so few houses were truly affected.
Slightly tangential to the property market but I had a good chuckle about this...
http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/busin...ity-in-the-world/story-e6fredj3-1226270757603
No doubt the high dollar is influencing this but really, you have to wonder how sustainable it is to have Adelaide as more expensive than the other cities mentioned above. Something's gotta give.
So going by that you would cash out here and buy your IPs overseas..........
So going by that you would cash out here and buy your IPs overseas..........
Ummmmmmm ..... so places like Zipswich which were sold as house and land packages to 95% LVR's which came under mortgage stress when rates went up flew under your radar then?
SO FEW HOUSES ???????? We are talking about Fig Tree Pocket and GraceVille that went underwater ...... ya know the old money areas???? What about the infrastructure and the boats that ended up in the bay??? The Cultural Centre and the pr0n pool at Southbank? Brett's Jetty ..... HUH ??? Are you paying attention !!!!!!!
P.S. Your eyes need some Clear Eyes drops in them.
Let us take for example Graceville.. How many houses went "under" were old Queenslanders which were on stilts, and were built in underneath?
These are then paid out by insurance money, and replaced = keeps tradies employed, and retailers who sell the product etc.
Insurance money coming in, generates work for people who otherwise would have less, and puts upwards pressure on housing prices as tradies continue to charge ridiculous rates as their supply and demand is more favourable than otherwise.
In all, only a small % are not liveable, and if it was larger then there would be higher prices as rental vacancies dropped and pressure to find housing increased.
Boats into the bay? Replacement of those boats with insurance money stimulates the economy (and if they weren't insured, they weren't really generating a huge amount anyway)
So... come again? and, when will the floods cease to be an excuse? 5 yrs? 10 yrs? or whenever the govt increases the FHVG again?
MW
I'd imagine that the floods will no longer be an excuse once the memory of them has worn off... How long that takes, I have no idea.
IMO, the floods can only be used to explain capital losses in those areas that are in excess of the capital losses of comparable areas.
Slight off topic:
I haven't checked this out in too much detail as I don't have the cash to do this... but I think it'd be worth checking the rental yield on some of those flooded areas and see if you can get a decent return for your dollar. Although the value of the properties may have fallen, it might just return a similar amount of rent as before... (just a thought, haven't actually verified this).
And then of-course this might be offset by higher insurance premiums.... just a possibility though.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?