- Joined
- 2 October 2006
- Posts
- 3,043
- Reactions
- 2
Coming from another perspective:
You say past performance is not an indicator of future returns - so by that logic one could argue that you cant call this a bubble yet as the main argument for the bubble is high median house price relative to median income relative to what it's been in the past. Rental yields are still the same as decades passed, as is capital growth. Still getting the same returns albeit at a greater capital outlay.
This bubble talk is ridiculous - heres a tip: house prices rise exponentially. Throughout your entire life you will see higher and higher prices. Our inflation is exponential too and ideally should be in line with the pace of housing. Have a peek at a graph trainspotter (i think) posted a few pages back showing the annual growth rate of property. Shock, horror it's been roughly the same for the last50 years. Exponential growth makes the situation appear more ominous then it really is.
Now i want to make this clear - i am not suggesting prices will always rise - they wont. We will hit some point of stagnation for a few years sometime in the future as wages catch up to property prices (they are expensive now no doubt about that). Property has been going through the same cycle for decades and will continue to do so (its the same cycle as most assets).
Too many people are pinning their hopes on a crash so that they can jump into the market. We have media, most ASF posters, most economists and most average joes spouting the 'bubble' line for the past 10 years - the market is still going against what the majority thinks. Get out on the ground and see what it's really like - it'll open your eyes.
Personally i see us at or near the top of the standard property cyclical phases. Expecting at some point soon a mild pullback in prices 5-10% from peak before a period of stagnation. But still buying another IP anyway - positive cashflow and dont give a fluff about the end price, already factored in to risk analysis.
It's funny how for property u say past performance is not an indicator of the future, yet for shares it seems like that theory is being push out alot.
its been a great ride, and i think it will be fired up some more.. i will buy into it when its all back to where it should be..
..
all good..
but remember.. past performance is not an indication of future returns.. ever!!
i recognise a bubble and wont buy into it.. if the RE values were growing to a correct 3 -4 X income then it wouldnt be a bubble.. to be at 7 - 9 X income is. simple..
"This bubble talk is ridiculous - heres a tip: house prices rise exponentially. Throughout your entire life you will see higher and higher prices."
lol .. every day every type of analyst, journo, government and reserve bank departments have spoken openly of the bubble..
but to be deluded into thinking RE prices "rise exponentially"... pure fantasy.. just a quick glance globally to many of the burst RE bubbles tells me this is not the case..
we all need bulls to tell us that this one is different, this one is not a bubble.. i posted a link to a 100 or 200 page californian realestate appraisal paper a while back, issued about 2 months before the market went kaboom!! i suggest you look back at that document and you will see it says everything the bulls here are saying..
I think you may have misinterpreted what I meant to say - I'm not saying that the % gain rises exponentially. The $ value of property rises exponentially. Look at a chart of house prices for most countries for the last 100 years. Exponential prices increases. It's the nature of capitalist societies - you have exponential increases in prices when yoy growth is a positive %. Same applies to commodities, consumption, population, etc. Anything with yoy will have its' size/cost/amount grow exponentially
well say if 7-8 times ratio is the new normal and past normals wont reflect future ratios etc etc.. its is still a bubble when you look at GDP% growth and how far money supply has exceeded that growth, unless there is a way for money supply to continue on its exponential path without correction I cannot see how we dont have some meaningful correction, crash whatever.
we are unbelievably susceptible to a trigger event, and the old fallacy that our inelastic supply will hold it up is laughable..
Completely fair - and that's why the only thing i'll be looking at are events that could serve as a trigger (rising unemployment, rising interest rates, slowdown in China, etc)
It's time to be cautious no doubt about that - if we get a large trigger event occuring the magnitude of any aftershock could be massive. But no point twiddling my thumbs and waiting for something to happen that might never happen - i've increased my required cash flow buffer but for now i'm still comfortable with the risk.
And if it does all crash well then i'll go on a spending spree:
Silly me ....... I finally found the global map of Australia that everyone is talking about as to why our house prices will drop. We are smack bang in the middle of Europe.
yeah im also making sure im cash heavy, dont wanna have the downturn and no $ on hand to capitalise, cos lending will be up to **** aswell no doubt
Silly me ....... I finally found the global map of Australia that everyone is talking about as to why our house prices will drop. We are smack bang in the middle of Europe.
View attachment 42273
Yeah dude, everything is juuuust fine.
Where is robots to let us know just how much sunshine and lollipops it all is.
Real housing data continues to stink. MoM home loans, released earlier today:
View attachment 42274
Remember these levels? I included the historical chart going back 6 years so you can get a rough idea how screwed we are talking.
Don't bother calling for a buyers strike, the buyers strike is involuntarily in FULL EFFECT.
I am starting to expect we will see the "unexpected" failure of some overleveraged garbage firm which will trigger the big ugly before June.
Me thinks robots is smarter than what you thinks.
As for the overleveraged garbage firm going the big ugly before June ...... is this 2011 you are talking about?
You are too late sinner ....... it started months ago.
Any charts on rent prices?
Nice collation of contemporary data here,
http://macrobusiness.com.au/2011/01/rental-yields-and-vacancy-rates/
Gross yields on units and houses (from RPdata), pays less than gross yield on a Commonwealth Bank account.
And I suspect you'll be doing the same for the next 22 months, 3100 posts and over 251 pages:
Trigger, trigger, trigger... As i've said before - you need a trigger for a crash, not just people perceiving an asset to be overvalued. You need forced selling!
We have:
Low unemployment
Low interest rates
Mining boom
Tax Advantages for property investment
Relatively tight rental market
You need one or more of the above to fail in a spectacular fashion in order for a large crash to occur. Otherwise people will just sit on the asset and wait. People will not sell property unless they have to...
...trigger trigger trigger
doesnt really show rent prices though..
If property was priced on rental returns then prices would stay stable through this period.. but there is no way thats the case in this country ; )
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?