- Joined
- 30 June 2008
- Posts
- 15,588
- Reactions
- 7,467
That logic ought to be applied to everything really.Stop #trend #policies, use brain, target roots of problems
This story has dozens of parallels bas. Often a purportedly green narrative has an underlying environmental cost, elsewhere, that goes unreported.Singapore prides itself on being one of the greenest places in Asia.
And yet a significant part of it's greenness comes from mining millions of tons of sand from Cambodia and destroying its mangrove swamps which feed millions of people.
Powerful story
When Your Land Is Stolen From Beneath Your Feet
...Nearly two decades following the dissolution of the regime, thousands of Cambodian families are experiencing a new wave of displacement. By talking with locals on the island of Koh Sralau, Mam found out that since 2007, the government of Cambodia has granted several private companies concessions to mine the country’s coastal mangrove forests. Each year, millions of metric tons of Cambodian sand are shipped to Singapore to expand that island nation’s landmass; Singapore has imported more than 80 million tons of sand so far. According to Mam, “The people and all the living creatures that depend on these forests for their livelihood are forced to cope with this massive loss.” In addition to displacing those who live and work on that land, Cambodia is also destroying its only natural barrier against erosion, rising sea levels, tsunamis, and hurricanes.
Very true.Often a purportedly green narrative has an underlying environmental cost, elsewhere, that goes unreported.
We really need to consider environmental impacts in toto.
Not that some here would know, but a simple reality of global warming - and a fact of basic physics - is that warmer air will carry more water, so when it does rain, more frequent flooding will occur.Global warming strikes again:
We are doomed
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-05...-river-system-left-to-run-its-course/11035506
how could it be Hobby farmer have a couple of cow/horse, do replant, are active in landcare and land for wildlife?? where are you? and what do you call hobby farmers?I have often thought what the increasing number of hobby farms does to flora and fauna.Local governments love them ,no doubt,for the rates.But they intrude into the more natural areas-a threat to bio-diversity.
Where I am in the Adelaide hills the hobby farms usually take up untouched marginal land,unproductive for farmers.With new roads and constant traffic,dogs,goats etc.Before this these areas supported more native flora and fuana.In some countries the delineation between town and country are very easy to observe...not so where we are.Once animals and birds lose their home range etc they are gone forever.They cannot encroach elsewhere as a rule.Same as clearing native forests.how could it be Hobby farmer have a couple of cow/horse, do replant, are active in landcare and land for wildlife?? where are you? and what do you call hobby farmers?
5 acres lots are not hobby farms, that's subdivision and urban sprawl in the making, and so is indeed bad for the environment with 2 dogs per lot wiping out koalas and wallabies..here in SE Qld,
but hobby farmers are a plus, they do not need land to produce $ so do not overstock or rape the land in pure desperation; Interested to understand where you come from?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?