- Joined
- 25 February 2007
- Posts
- 838
- Reactions
- 1
nizar said:Always use stops.
No exceptions.
Each positon should carry a risk attached of no more than 2% of your total capital, the experts say.
And i personally think that figure should be <<1%.
At least by limiting your losses you should survive to trade again. Otherwise its game over.
Always think the worst case scenario and be ready for it.
Are you saying that if you have investment capital of $100,000, no position should be for more than $1000?nizar said:Always use stops.
No exceptions.
Each positon should carry a risk attached of no more than 2% of your total capital, the experts say.
And i personally think that figure should be <<1%.
Julia said:Are you saying that if you have investment capital of $100,000, no position should be for more than $1000?
Or have I misunderstood what you mean?
Julia
MichaelD said:1. Losing more than planned for by ignoring my carefully constructed trading plans.
Lesson learned: In the heat of the moment, don't deviate from the trading plan, no matter what happens.
2. Wasting time on developing things that don't matter much, like being a little bit more right.
Lesson learned: My time is best spent working out how to skew reward:risk more in my favour and improving my money management techniques.
3. Wasting time in circular trading arguments both online and offline.
Lesson learned: Don't waste psychological energy on those firmly committed to being in the 90%.
MichaelD said:3. Wasting time in circular trading arguments both online and offline.
Lesson learned: Don't waste psychological energy on those firmly committed to being in the 90%.
There are different approaches.value investor said:I know I will not be popular. However I think that "stop losses" should be called "make losses". I think that when I pick a stock to buy that I am buying a part of the company, just as if I was buying my own franchise or whatever without the hassle of having to run it, only the benefit of owning a great company at a cheap price. If I felt that I needed a "stop loss" I would then feel like I have not researched the company enough and therefore would rather not buy it. If the price goes down then I would probably buy more as long as my original feelings about the company had not changed.
My biggest mistake so far has been not buying something because somebody else talked me out of it even though I believed it fitted my criteria and then I watched it almost double in a week and stay there.
If you can't tell I am fairly new at this and have read mostly Warren Buffett and Phil fisher. I am yet to see if these ideas payoff in the long run and I would love to hear any feedback on my views.
value investor said:I know I will not be popular. However I think that "stop losses" should be called "make losses". I think that when I pick a stock to buy that I am buying a part of the company, just as if I was buying my own franchise or whatever without the hassle of having to run it, only the benefit of owning a great company at a cheap price. If I felt that I needed a "stop loss" I would then feel like I have not researched the company enough and therefore would rather not buy it. If the price goes down then I would probably buy more as long as my original feelings about the company had not changed.
My biggest mistake so far has been not buying something because somebody else talked me out of it even though I believed it fitted my criteria and then I watched it almost double in a week and stay there.
If you can't tell I am fairly new at this and have read mostly Warren Buffett and Phil fisher. I am yet to see if these ideas payoff in the long run and I would love to hear any feedback on my views.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?