- Joined
- 29 January 2006
- Posts
- 7,217
- Reactions
- 4,438
First, your above reference to stimulus spending related to a Bill in December that sailed through the House of Representatives by 359-53 and the Senate by 92-6m so it had bipartisan support.They were handing money everywhere.
Here's a few examples of the previous stimulus bills:
$85.5m for assistance to Cambodia, $134m to Burma, $1.3bn for Egypt and the Egyptian military, which will go out and buy almost exclusively Russian military equipment, $25m for democracy and gender programmes in Pakistan, $505m to Belize, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, and Panama.
There was a further $33 mill for Venezuela, $500mill to Israel,$300 mill to counter China.
And you're worried about rushing them through?
Just to be clear both sides engaged in this. Trump pointed it out ( regardless of showboating for the election or not).
Trump managed to get the US economy buzzing back after covid. And it wasn't from regulating and taxing the sht out of everything. And once again Covid happened and money was spent. But you can hide behind that fact by just quoting figures without context.
He was a high spending president. Didn’t agree with a lot of it, or his claims. But he pointed out inherent flaws and threats correctly.
Execution he failed. But majority of presidents never shot in the right direction to begin with.
Perhaps read what I wrote instead of further half truths.First, your above reference to stimulus spending related to a Bill in December that sailed through the House of Representatives by 359-53 and the Senate by 92-6m so it had bipartisan support.
Yes, I reiterated the point that it was a measure that both parties favoured as it also incorporated essential budget matters that would have closed down the Bureaucracy.Perhaps read what I wrote instead of further half truths.
"Just to be clear both sides engaged in this"
Trump vetoed it and wanted more spent on the US people (doubled as an election sweetener).
Or keep misrepresenting what I wrote.
Deflection. Original post was about democrats. You decided to sideline.Yes, I reiterated the point that it was a measure that both parties favoured as it also incorporated essential budget matters that would have closed down the Bureaucracy.
Despite Trump already having lost the election, he rejected a Bill he did not understand and was unwilling to input into in the first place, so incompetent was he.
But again, you are in thee wrong thread.
Deflection. Original post was about democrats. You decided to sideline.
So your posts continue your theme of falsehoods and distortions, and regularly invoke Trump in a thread about Biden's Presidency.It's basically Obama/Trump lite in most regards.
Where were you the first 4 years of Trump?
Now you think it's a problem?
I'd say the problem began a while back and this is the end result.
US politics has so far been one big cluster fluck.
You don't correct them though do you. Weak deflection at best.On the contrary.
After @Joe Blow deleted one of your posts and made a point about how this thread lacked decent content your very next post was this:
So your posts continue your theme of falsehoods and distortions, and regularly invoke Trump in a thread about Biden's Presidency.
It's tedious correcting your points, especially as you continue to rehash points covered in threads about Trump.
You don't correct them though do you. Weak deflection at best.
I'd say my deleted post stands. So far you have put up some weak attempts and a chart that basically showed your lack of context.
Apart from your pro-Trump lies and distortions you have no interest beyond slights on posters, so hopefully @Joe Blow closes the thread.Is this thread ever going to rise above petty personal slights, endless bicking and ten second clips of Joe Biden from Twitter?
There is so much of substance to discuss, but nothing of substance ever gets discussed.
Here's a list of Executive Orders signed by Joe Biden. Surely there's something there to discuss? Biden freezing out the Saudis ahead of the publication of a US intelligence report on Jamal Khashoggi's murder? Worth debating?
I don't care if you love Biden or hate him, just post something interesting or thought provoking please.
I'll give this thread another week, and if nothing changes I'll consider it a lost cause and close it.
Perhaps don’t try to distort what's actually posted. All your "corrections" were false, or a half truths. Your other tactic is to say it's "lies".Here is what was requested:
Apart from your pro-Trump lies and distortions you have no interest beyond slights on posters, so hopefully @Joe Blow closes the thread.
Need confirmation they were American made rockets fired by CIA trained terrorists. Then we're back to normal.well it looks as though things are returning to normal in middle East, that didn't take long.
One man dies after rocket attack on US airbase in Iraq
At least 10 rockets are launched towards a military base in western Iraq that hosts United States, coalition and Iraqi forces, in what appears to be the first retaliatory attack after the US struck Iran-aligned militia targets last week.www.abc.net.au
Need confirmation they were American made rockets fired by CIA trained terrorists. Then we're back to normal.
I'd argue that "progressive" and "conservative" are terms which have been partially hijacked and don't necessarily mean what they used to mean.I don't envy Biden. He has to appease the progressive factions in his party.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?