Australian (ASX) Stock Market Forum

"The best place to be is in commodities"

November 23, 2009

Rare Earths: Is The Present Hype Justified ? Can We Pick The Winners ?

By Michael Hampton
www.minesite.com/aus/html

What a difference a year makes. There has been a dramatic transformation in the outlook for the Rare Earth companies from no hopes to big hopes, as the Rare Earths have become the latest "hot" sector to capture investors' imagination. We all know that mining investors are prone to flights of fancy, and the staying power of dreams will be now tested on a long hard road from discovery to production.

Metal Events Ltd's “5th International Rare Earths Conference" held in Hong Kong last week, was a great place for a reality check on the current state of the Rare Earths sector. Despite its history, and an ability to attract the top companies in this growing industry, the conference was concerned about their numbers. A room had been booked for 70 people, but in March it seemed that the interest level was too small to attract the usual number of participants. The organisers decided to go ahead with the same size room anyway, with whatever numbers they could get. When the doors opened on November 18th for the two day conference, there were 170 delegates, a new record - and the room was groaning with people.

The changes in market capitalisation of companies involved in the conference revealed the extent of the turnaround. Picking ten public companies in the audience with Rare Earth mining projects at various stages of development, the aggregate market capitalisation as of mid-November was US$1.59 billion. Using the same number of shares outstanding, and the end-2008 stock prices, the market capitalisation would have been US$518 million. That's a rise of 206 per cent in 10 and a half months, far above the general stock indices. One cannot help but ask, is the present optimism justified?

Dudley Kingsnorth of Industrial Minerals Company of Australia Ltd put it well in his presentation. Money is available, he said, but is not infinite. "Perhaps US$2 billion will be available to the Rare Earths sector," said Kingsnorth. "If it is spread evenly over the 57 existing projects, it will be squandered." The industry will need to advance the right projects, and advance them quickly, if it’s to prevent a destructive price squeeze in a few years time. The crunch may arrive as early as 2014 or 2015.

Overall annual growth rates in consumption have mostly fallen in the range of between nine per cent and 22 per cent per annum, according to Baotou Research Institute of Rare Earths (BRIRE). In a paper prepared by Ms. Song Honghang, Director, and presented by her colleague Wang Yan, a review of 60 years of history showed China's remarkable role in taking production from just 1,000 tons 1978, to 2,500 in 1980, and then 20,000 in 1989. After that rapid pace, there was a slowdown in 1990, but after that, growth resumed. From 1991 to 1995, growth was again back over 20 per cent per annum. Over the past decade, growth has been much closer to 10 per cent annually, which is still rapid on this bigger base. Total demand for Rare Earth Oxides was near 130,000 tonnes in 2008. While 2009 is a clear down year, thanks mainly to a big destocking in Japan, the potential for high growth over the coming decade is excellent. Our green dreams cannot be realised without ongoing growth in production of these unique metals.

The simple political reality, which we discussed in detail here when we covered last year's conference, is that the world is highly dependent on China for Rare Earths. Something like 90 per cent of annual production comes from China, and the Chinese are using more domestically and tightening their export quotes. BRIRE's figures show that Rare Earth Oxide ("REO") exports peaked at 55,000 tons in 2005, and have been falling as quotas are tightened. (REO figures are slightly deceptive, since the oxide is about five to 10 per cent heavier than its REE content.) Some industry sources estimate that as much as 10,000 tons of "gray" material leaves the country outside the quotas. But this "gray" figure is conjecture, and the Chinese government is aiming to restrain future leakage outside the quota. The inevitable nervousness over supply sources has brought about a race for new sources of production. Manufacturers in Japan, Europe, and the US all want to see diverse sources for these critical elements, as they launch new products with REE content.

Prices are down year-on-year, but a mania for the Rare Earth miners was ignited by a report coming out of one of the Chinese ministries in the Spring of 2009 that China was considering a complete ban on the export of certain rare earths in their raw form, preferring to export value-added products and spur manufacturing the jobs in China. This report was later "clarified" in the summer, but it was followed by recommendations from various stock brokers and analysts that Rare Earth related mining stocks were a good way to play the emerging green energy boom, since new mines are needed to counter a possible stranglehold by the Chinese.

In fact, with 2008 demand at 130,000 tons of REO, a resumption of 10 per cent-plus growth could add 15,000 to 20,000 tons annually to demand. That would essentially require perhaps one new world class Rare Earths mine being added each year for the foreseeable future. Fortunately, there are two giants waiting in the wings, and they are both outside China.

Lynas Corp's (LYC.au) Mount Weld deposit in Western Australia is a high grade carbonatite deposit. According to the presentation from the company's Vice President, Matthew James, the project is progressing well again. The key step was raising money to fund remaining construction costs. In late April, China Non-Ferrous Metals agreed to invest A$252 million for a majority stake. But the terms were not approved by the Australian government. So the company turned to the equity markets, and completed a two stage financing totalling A$450 million at A$0.45 in October. This will allow it to finish the mine and related infrastructure, and build a large processing facility in Malaysia, where there will be access to cheaper power. Mr James expects production to commence in the first half of 2011, initially at an annual rate of 11,000 tons. Later, Lynas will ramp up to between 20,000 and 22,000 tons, which would give it perhaps 14 per cent of the global market in REO.

Also at an intermediate stage is Arafura's (ARU.au) Nolans project, which chairman Nick Muir spoke about. Arafura has an approximate 30 million ton deposit, right in the "center of Australia." It has a pilot plant funded by the government, and is facing a capital expenditure of perhaps A$400 million to put a mine into production. Arafura will also be replacing its chief executive, who has recently resigned, and seeking possible strategic partners.

Later, Ian Chalmers of Alkane Resources (ALK.au) described his company's Dubbo project in New South Wales, a Zirconium and HREE project, which was the subject of a feasibility study in 2002, and which received a government grant to build a pilot plant, and which went into operation in 2008. Prospective buyers are presently evaluating output products. The economics of starting up an enlarged mine will be improved if zirconium, niobium, and yttrium prices line up, and allow the company to sign long term off-take agreements at prices which will support construction of an expanded mine.

Brief presentations were also given by privately-owned Frontier Minerals which has the high grade Zandkopsdrift carbonatite deposit in the Northern Cape province of South Africa, Greenland Minerals (GGG.au), which has the Kvanefjeld deposit in the country with the same name, privately-owned Mongol Gazar which has a deposit in Mongolia.

Beyond these, although they didn’t present, are dozens of companies with Rare Earth projects. Industry expert Dudley Kingsnorth mentioned that there are 57 Rare Earth projects on the go, but another conference delegate said that the figure is over 120 projects, including some newly added ones, which are based upon only "a handful of grab samples."

If history is any guide, and the market stays keen, a number of the new companies will raise enough capital to progress their projects. But how can anyone, especially an investor new to this sector, be expected to pick the winners, in what is becoming a crowded field at the early stage end?

The old formula of going for size and grade may not work, because the development of RE deposits is a highly complex matter. Evaluating the potential for a gold deposit with straightforward metallurgy is relatively easy. A poly-metallic deposit with complex metallurgy is more difficult, and picking winners in the Rare Earths sector may be the most difficult game of all. That is because there are so many different elements involved, each with their own supply, demand and pricing dynamics. And then there are the problems which begin as you mine the deposit. The rare earths must be extracted and separated from each other. Furthermore, we then get to the "dirty secret" of rare earths, which is that virtually every deposit is radioactive, with a significant concentration of thorium or uranium bound up with the Rare Earths themselves. This makes the separation and handling of the materials even more complex and critical and is why the price tags for capital expenditures are so very high.

But there is no doubt that the Rare Earths mining sector has a bright future. The likes of the gold rush that we saw after the nickel discovery at Voisey's Bay and the uranium price boom of 2007 may come to Rare Earths at well. But if too many early stage companies are floated, a large number of investors in these new companies are going to be disappointed.

[Text was too long. I had to shorten it]
 
Aluminum ETF: Due For A Crash?
by Michael Johnston(USA) on November 24, 2009

U.S. stocks and aluminum represent very different asset classes, but some investors have begun to notice troublesome similarities between the two. Following a furious bull market rally on Wall Street over the last several months, it is beginning to appear that U.S. stocks have run too far too fast. By many measures, domestic equity markets are now overvalued, perhaps by as much as 25%.

[To read the full story and see the graphs, please click the link below]
http://etfdb.com/2009/aluminum-etf-due-for-a-crash/
 
Brian Milner

Globe and Mail (Canada)
Nov. 23, 2009

Harvard University financial historian Niall Ferguson has climbed to the head of the doom brigade – and the bestseller lists – with his strong views, clear prose and prescient pronouncements about the global financial crisis. The Oxford-schooled native of Glasgow, whose latest best-seller, The Ascent of Money, is now out in paperback, continues to make waves.


[Click the link below for the must read interview Mr. Ferguson did with Report on Business. At the end of the interview there are 34 comments from readers]

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/repo...all-ferguson-is-still-bearish/article1374647/
 
Tuesday, November 17, 2009
The Coming Nuclear Crisis
The world is running out of uranium and nobody seems to have noticed.

Source >> http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/arxiv/24414/
[To read readers' comments and Michael Dittmar's analysis of the nuclear industry, please click on the above link]

The world is about to enter a period of unprecedented investment in nuclear power. The combined threats of climate change, energy security and fears over the high prices and dwindling reserves of oil are forcing governments towards the nuclear option. The perception is that nuclear power is a carbon-free technology, that it breaks our reliance on oil and that it gives governments control over their own energy supply.

That looks dangerously overoptimistic, says Michael Dittmar, from the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich who publishes the final chapter of an impressive four-part analysis of the global nuclear industry on the arXiv today.

Perhaps the most worrying problem is the misconception that uranium is plentiful. The world's nuclear plants today eat through some 65,000 tons of uranium each year. Of this, the mining industry supplies about 40,000 tons. The rest comes from secondary sources such as civilian and military stockpiles, reprocessed fuel and re-enriched uranium. "But without access to the military stocks, the civilian western uranium stocks will be exhausted by 2013, concludes Dittmar.

It's not clear how the shortfall can be made up since nobody seems to know where the mining industry can look for more.

That means countries that rely on uranium imports such as Japan and many western countries will face uranium shortages, possibly as soon as 2013. Far from being the secure source of energy that many governments are basing their future energy needs on, nuclear power looks decidedly rickety.

But what of new technologies such as fission breeder reactors which generate fuel and nuclear fusion? Dittmar is pessimistic about fission breeders. "Their huge construction costs, their poor safety records and their inefficient performance give little reason to believe that they will ever become commercially significant," he says.

And the future looks even worse for nuclear fusion: "No matter how far into the future we may look, nuclear fusion as an energy source is even less probable than large-scale breeder reactors."

Dittmar paints a bleak future for the countries betting on nuclear power. And his analysis doesn't even touch on issues such as safety, the proliferation of nuclear technology and the disposal of nuclear waste.

The message if you live in one of these countries is to stock up on firewood and candles.

There is one tantalising ray of sunlight in this nuclear nightmare: the possibility that severe energy shortages will force governments to release military stockpiles of weapons grade uranium and plutonium for civilian use. Could it be possible that the coming nuclear energy crisis could rid the world of most of its nuclear weapons?



Ref: "The Future of Nuclear Energy: Facts and Fiction"
By Michael Dittmar, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich

arxiv.org/abs/0908.0627: Chapter I: Nuclear Fission Energy Today
arxiv.org/abs/0908.3075: Chapter II: What is known about Secondary Uranium Resources?
arxiv.org/abs/0909.1421: Chapter III: How (un)reliable are the Red Book Uranium Resource Data?
arxiv.org/abs/0911.2628 :Chapter IV: Energy from Breeder Reactors and from Fusion?
 
November 29, 2009

That Was The Week That Was … In Australia

By Our Man in Oz
www.minesite.com/aus.html

Minews. Good morning Australia. How did your market treat to Dubai’s debt default? As a speed bump on the recovery road? Or as a brick wall?

Oz. More like a speed bump so far, but a sovereign default, even of a small Middle East country, is a reminder of the high level of residual risk in the global economy after last year’s failure of the banking system in the USA and Europe. Overall, the Australian market, as measured by the all ordinaries index, ended the week down 2.3 per cent, mainly thanks to some sharp falls from the banks. Mining stocks ended the week down by just 0.5 per cent, with the gold sector holding up best of all and posting a gain of 1.5 per cent. As you would expect, most of the damage was done on Friday after Dubai confessed to its debt problems, with all eyes now on Monday’s opening to see whether the default spreads to other emerging markets.

Minews. Is Dubai that important in Australia?

Oz. Any sovereign default flows across borders, and we’re not immune to doubts about the strength of the recovery. Most of the countries in our region fall into the emerging market category and defaults have a habit of becoming contagious as we have seen in the previous cases of Argentina and Russia. The major immediate issue for Australia is whether the Reserve Bank raises interest rates for a third consecutive month when it meets on Tuesday. If it does ratchet rates up by another 0.25 per cent it will be the first time ever that our central bank has raised over three consecutive months.

Minews. Enough of the big picture stuff let’s have some prices, please, starting with gold.

Oz. A good choice, because gold and iron ore were once again the sectors favoured by investors last week. Adding to the gold market was a slide in the value of the Australian dollar against the US dollar. A few weeks ago the Aussie dollar was trading around US94 cents and was on track to achieve parity by Christmas. On Friday it closed at US90.6 cents. That decline combined with a US dollar gold price holding above US$1,170 delivered a 5.5 per cent rise in the Australian dollar gold price last week.

The twin benefits of global demand for gold, and the currency effect - which might be tested in the weeks ahead if we get a fresh outbreak of market turmoil – meant that most Australian gold stocks gained ground, although the best work was negated by the Friday sell off. The gold index added 4.2 per cent between Monday and Thursday, before dropping by 2.7 per cent on Friday.

Best of the gold stocks included Resolute (RSG), which we took a squiz at on Friday. It added A11 cents over the week to close at A$1.17, which was just half a cent below its 12 month high set on Thursday. OceanaGold (OGC), the New Zealand gold specialist, put on a star turn with a rise of A39 cents to A$1.92. CGA Gold (CGX), which has been reporting record ore throughput and gold production at its Mabate mine in the Philippines, shot up to a 12 month high of A2.23 on Thursday, before easing back to end the week at A$2.21, a gain of A29 cents. Also better off, Kingsgate (KCN) cracked the A$10 barrier on Monday, setting a fresh high of A$10.07, before trailing away to close on Friday at A$9.73 for a gain over the week of just A13 cents.

Elsewhere, in a sector which remains in robust health, Silver Lake (SLR), rose by A14 cents to A$1.18 over the week, and closed slightly off an all-time high of A$1.26 reached on Wednesday. Meanwhile, Troy (TRY), where peace reigns after a tumultuous year, added A6 cents to A$2.64, but was as high as A$2.79 on Thursday. Also on the up, Avoca (AVO) rose by A6 cents to A$2.03, while Catalpa (CAH) added half a cent after announcing the final legal steps in its complex merger with Lion Selection. A few gold stocks swam against the trend, but not severely. Eleckra (EKM) slipped half a cent lower to A11 cents. Andean (AND) lost A2 cents to A$2.52, and Ampella (AMX) eased back by A1.5 cents to A62.5 cents.

Minews. Iron ore now, please?

Oz. There was strong interest again in iron ore stocks, though not quite as strong overall as in gold. Iron Ore Holdings (IOH), which has generated considerable interest in your part of the world, added another A15 cents to A$1.62 over the week, but dropped back from an all-time high of A$1.83 reached on Tuesday. Golden West (GWR) was another star, continuing a powerful revival which started a few weeks ago after a year in the sin bin. It rose by A26 cents to A87 cents, but did get as high as A$1.06 on Thursday, which is three-times its price of three weeks ago. Red Hill Iron (RHI), which rarely gets a mention anywhere, stood out with a rise of A53 cents to A$3.53 as it moves closer to developing its West Pilbara project in conjunction with Aquila Resources (AQA). Aquila itself was up A67 cents to A$9.77. Meanwhile, Giralia (GIR) put on A8 cents to A$1.22, and IMX (IXR) added A4 cents to A33 cents. Going down among the iron ore stocks Fortescue (FMG) dropped A21 cents to A$4.01, and Northern Iron (NFE) continued a losing streak, off another A5 cents at A$1.53. Atlas (AGO) shed A4 cents to A$1.84, and BC Iron (BCI) lost A6 cents to close the week as A$1.05.

Minews. Let’s switch across to base metals.

Oz. Not much joy there after Friday’s sell-off. Syndicated Metals (SMD) was the only copper stock to rise over the week, putting in a very modest gain of A1 cent to A21 cents. After that it was all red ink. Blackthorn (BTR), despite our optimistic assessment early last week, closed down half a cent at A64.5 cents with all of the damage done on Friday. Until the sell orders hit the market Blackthorn had been as high as A72.5 cents. Sandfire (SFR) continued to report strong results from its Doolgunna project but slipped A18 cents to A$3.76. Talisman (TLM) lost A7 cents to A89 cents. OZ (OZL) fell by A9 cents to A$1.18, and CuDeco (CDU) dropped sharply with a loss of A62 cents to A$5.25. Nickel stocks were generally weaker. Western Areas (WSA) dropped A11 cents to A$5.07. Minara (MRE) eased back by A4.5 cents to A81 cents, and Panoramic (PAN) fell A14 cents to A$2.36. Mincor (MCR) held its ground to close steady at A1.99 and Independence (IGO) added an eye-catching A27 cents to A$4.69, but was stronger mainly because of its gold interests. Zinc stocks did little. Terramin (TZN) rose by A4 cents to A75 cents. CBH (CBH) fell A1.2 cents to A9.8 cents, and Perilya (PEM) added A3.5 cents to A51 cents.

Minews. Uranium, coal and specials to finish, please.

Oz. Like the base metals sector it was hard to find a uranium or coal stock moving higher. Mantra (MRU) fell A28 cents to A$4.16, and Manhattan (MHC) ran out of puff after a strong upward month, shedding A21 cents to A$1.16. Extract (EXT), another recent uranium favourite, fell A17 cents to A$7.77. The only coal stock to rise was Riversdale (RIV), which added A48 cents to A$6.23 after news that a Brazilian company has acquired a stake in it from Australia’s Macarthur Coal (MCC). Macarthur itself slipped A1 cent to A$9.20. Coal of Africa (CZA) fell A16 cents to A$1.73, but might be worth a fresh look next week as it is getting closer to some major changes.

Two specials worth noting were Nkwe Platinum (NKP), which has been holding a round-Australian roadshow, an event which helps explain a rise of A8 cents to A43 cents, and Mineral Resources (MIN), a very aggressive mine services outfit which has been busy bidding for construction work, launching takeover bids, and has emerged as a leader in the latest attempt to revive the mothballed Windimurra vanadium plant. It added A2 cents last week to close at A$7.15, but did hit a 12 month high of A$7.59 on Tuesday.

Minews. Thanks Oz.
 
Australia ousts US as second-biggest gold producer, SA slips to fourth

Esmarie Swanepoel - 30th November 2009
http://www.miningweekly.com/article...t-gold-producer-sa-slips-to-fourth-2009-11-30

Australia has surpassed the US as the world’s second-biggest gold-producing country in the first half of 2009, and is on track to maintain that ranking for the full year, Melbourne-based mining consultants Surbiton Associates said at the weekend.

China is the world’s number-one producer of the precious metal, with South Africa – which was the top gold-producing country for more than 100 years – slipping to fourth place.

Australia held the title as the world’s second-largest gold producer in 2005 behind South Africa, but it was overtaken by the US in 2006, and by China in 2007, putting it back to fourth place, explained Surbiton Associates director Dr Sandra Close.

“But with the continued decline in South African output and lower production in the US in the first half of 2009, Australia has regained the number-two spot.”

Surbiton’s figures showed that Australia produced 112 t of gold in the first half of 2009. By comparison, China’s Ministry of Industry and Information Technology recorded Chinese production at 147 t for the first half of 2009, while the US produced 105 t, according to the US Geological Survey.

The South African Chamber of Mines reported that output was around 103 t for the same period.

“Few people seem to realise just how important the gold industry is to Australia,” Close said.

“Currently, the value of our mine production of gold at around A$7,5-billion is equal to the value of Australia’s exports of wool, wine and dairy products combined.”

She added that Australia had regained its ranking as the number-two world gold producer prior to the increase in production expected from new mines in the next few quarters.

NEW PRODUCTION

Earlier this month, Newmont Mining achieved commercial production at its new Boddington gold mine in Australia, which will produce an average of one-million ounces a year.

Boddington, located 120 km south east of Perth, poured its first gold at the end of September and will be the Australia’s largest gold mine.

“For some time, Telfer and the Super Pit have each produced between160 000 oz and 190 000 oz a quarter,” Close said, but added that both operations would be “well and truly overtaken” when Boddington reached full its production of 250 000 oz a quarter.

Surbiton Associates reported that Australian gold output totalled 56 t, or 1,8-million ounces in the September quarter 2009. This was a one-ton less than in the previous quarter and about half a ton less than in the September quarter in 2008.

Close noted that production had been relatively stable for several quarters.

Operations with lower gold output in the September quarter included Newmont’s Tanami mine, down 19 000 oz and the Super Pit, down 16 000 oz.

Increased output came from the East Kundana joint venture, which was up 19 000 oz; Canadian miner Barrick’s Yilgarn South operations, up 13 000 oz; and South Africa’s AngloGold Ashanti’s Sunrise Dam mine, which was up 8 000 oz.

“Most of Australia’s gold comes from mines which predominantly produce gold but some 6% to 7% comes from operations where gold is a by-product,” Close said.

“Recently, we have seen a rise of some two-thirds of a ton per quarter of by-product gold owing to the contribution from Oz Minerals’ Prominent Hill operation.”

She added that although the US dollar gold price had risen to record levels, Australian gold producers had not received the full benefit of the rising price owing to the exchange rate impact. Australian gold prices peaked at A$1 547/oz in February compared with a current Australian gold price of around A$1 300/oz.

“Back in February, the Australian dollar was worth around $0,64,” Close said.

“Today, it is over $0,90. Even though the gold price in US dollar terms has been setting a new record on a regular basis, or Australian producers much of this benefit has been eaten up by the rising exchange rate.”
 
November 30, 2009

The Dollar Is Not The Only Risk: Dubai’s Crunch Is Likely To Be A Lot Less Transparent Than The USA’s

By Rob Davies
www.minesite.com/aus.html

The news that Dubai World had asked for standstill agreement on debt payments until the end of May next year sent capital markets into a frenzy last week. Investors had assumed that this state owned entity was backed by the government of Dubai and, in extremis, by its neighbour Abu Dhabi.

But the vagueness and confusion surrounding the statement that announced the standstill agreement depressed a number of asset classes. One market that suffered in particular was the sukuk market that trades Islamic bonds. Dubai World’s wounded Nakeel bond is one such.

However, when all’s said and done, for every down trade there is usually a positive counterparty and last week the dollar benefited significantly from positive support. It gained as much as 2.3 per cent against some currencies, although it fell to a 14 year low against the yen.

Yet, even in spite of the strength of the dollar, gold reached a new record of US$1,194 an ounce during the week, before it eased back. Also stronger, copper traded briefly over US$7,000 a tonne before closing at US$6,904, a gain of 2.1 per cent on the week.

What the events in the Gulf demonstrated was that many risks other than the risk of weakness in the dollar remain in capital markets. While the dollar receives a lot of attention because of its wide international reach and transparency, there are many other assets that have the potential to trip up investors.

The great beauty of Anglo Saxon-based investments is that investors usually have recourse to common law if they feel disadvantaged. Hedge funds holding sukuk bonds that are possibly, or possibly not, backed by governments in the Middle East, may not get very far in pressing claims in British or American courts.

Uncertainty is part and parcel of the investing world and the contents of a presentation last week from Ambrian, a junior stockbroker, represented a timely reminder of just how difficult life is for analysts. Peter Davey, a self confessed long-in-the-tooth mining analyst, was ably supported by veteran metals experts Ted Arnold, covering base metals, and Jessica Cross on precious metals and bulk commodities.

The essence of what Ted and Jessica had to say centred on the remarkable growth in Chinese demand over the last ten years, offset by the difficulty of getting much hard and reliable data from the country. There is no doubt that underlying demand is strong but it has been reinforced, says Ted, by a large amount of hoarding. This is not just at the state level in terms of bulging warehouses and piles at the dockside, but also at the individual and small company level.

In some cases businessmen have armed guards patrolling outside houses and offices containing hundreds of tonnes of nickel. The fear that lies behind such hoarding is that inflation will take off in the future and raw material prices will rocket.

In such a large industry there is a huge amount of information to digest but Peter Davey provided a neat summary. In his view the best performance in the mining and metals space - a sector that will do well as a whole - will come from three commodities: iron ore, copper and platinum, the commodities the Chinese will be hungriest for over time.

Perhaps someone should tell the kingdom of Dubai to forget grandiose plans to build massive hotels on artificial islands. They should just issue bonds to buy a whole load of these three commodities instead.
 
Viewpoints

December 2009

Dubai: What the Immediate Future Holds
Mohamed El-Erian, PIMCO, USA

Until last Wednesday, most investors saw Dubai as an attractive tourist destination, a regional financial centre and an example of what bold and visionary leadership can achieve.

Some worried that Dubai's impressive achievements came with a debt burden that would prove difficult to sustain after last year's financial crisis.

This weekend, investors around the world are united in wondering "what does Dubai mean for me?"

In calling for a standstill in its debt servicing payments, Dubai has triggered local, national, regional and global forces that will play out in the weeks ahead.

At the local level, the standstill is an explicit recognition that the Emirate's debt and leverage levels cannot be sustained in what, at PIMCO, we have called the "new normal". The question for Dubai is now two-fold: can an orderly extension of debt payments be achieved; and how will this impact the risk premium that is attached to other economic and financial activities in the Emirate?

The key issue at the national level is how Abu Dhabi, the largest and richest of the seven UAE Emirates, will react. Here, it is a question of willingness. The leaders of Abu Dhabi must strike that delicate balance between using enormous wealth to support Dubai and ensuring appropriate burden sharing among those that repeatedly failed to heed Abu Dhabi's past warnings about the excesses in Dubai.

The regional dimension is captured by a word familiar to investors in emerging markets: "contagion". The immediate reaction of almost all markets (and too many commentators) is to lump together countries in the region that have very different characteristics. Witness how market measures of risk have surged for all the oil exporters in the region even though they share none of Dubai's debt and leverage characteristics.

At the global level, the Dubai announcement serves as a catalyst to take the froth off expensive financial markets. For the last few months, massive injections of liquidity (primarily by the U.S.), aimed at limiting the adverse impact of the financial crisis on employment, have turbo-charged financial market valuations rather than make their way to the real economy. While many have worried about the generalized over-extension of equity markets, most have hesitated to take money off the table as there did not appear to be a catalyst to break the general "trend is your friend" mentality. Dubai is that catalyst.

So, what next?

First, it will take time to sort out the Dubai situation. Inevitably, this is an uncertain and protracted process that involves both on- and off-balance sheet exposures. It will cast a cloud not only on companies in the Emirate itself but also on institutions that have large exposures there, especially in the banking and real estate sectors.

Second, the immediate indiscriminate sell-off in regional (and emerging market) names will, over time, give way to greater differentiation based on economic and financial realities. Those with strong fundamentals will recover (including Abu Dhabi, Brazil, Kuwait, Qatar and Saudi Arabia) while others, including countries with large deficits and debt burdens in eastern/central/southern Europe, may come under more pressure.

Finally, and most importantly, Dubai serves as a warning to those that were quick to find comfort in the sharp market rally of the last few months. Since the summer, the appreciation of risk assets has been driven predominantly by artificial liquidity injections rather than fundamentals. The Dubai announcement is a reminder that a flood of government-induced liquidity cannot mask all excesses, all the time.

Investors should treat last Wednesday's announcement as an illustration of the lagged financial effects of the global financial crisis. The Dubai situation is no different than that facing commercial real estate in the U.S. and U.K.

Let Dubai be a reminder to all: last year's financial crisis was a consequential phenomenon whose lagged impact is yet to play out fully in the economic, financial, institutional and political arenas.


Source >> http://www.pimco.com/LeftNav/Viewpoints/2009/Viewpoints+Telegraph+Dubai+El-Erian+Dec.htm
 
Gold run a reason to be wary of the stock market
Commentary: 10 years ago, everyone had lost interest in yellow metal

By Brett Arends
BOSTON (MarketWatch, 30 NOV 2009) -- The booming gold price is making me very nervous. About Wall Street.

Why? Because gold's rocketing boom -- it's risen from around $260 an ounce about a decade ago to just under $1,200 now -- is a vivid daily example of what a real bull market looks like.

Sounds like common sense, yes? Maybe even a banality.

But here's the problem: Those holding a lot of stocks right now are taking a gamble that the big bear market on Wall Street, which began in 2000, ended earlier this year. They're betting that the Dow Jones Industrial Average (INDEX:INDU) , now 10,309, won't tumble again toward, or even below, the intraday low of 6,440 seen on March 9.

Are they right?

No one yet knows for certain. Looking back to early March, there certainly was a lot of panic and capitulation, which you usually see at a market bottom. People talked of a new "Great Depression." One thing I noted at the time was that investors were shying away even from rock-solid defensive stocks with big, well-protected dividend yields. People weren't just scared; they were petrified.

Is that really how a massive bear market usually ends?

The last example before our eyes was gold, whose big bear market ended a decade ago. It looked very different.

Like shares in the 1930s and the early 1980s, gold ended its secular bear market in 1999-2001 with a whimper, not a bang. People didn't panic; they simply lost interest.

I remember calling around gold analysts in London in 2000, when gold was near its lows. There weren't many left; most of them had been laid off years earlier, as investor demand had dried up. The few who remained generally earned their keep by advising gold-mining companies on how to use the futures market to sell their output. It was dull work in a dull market.

Key fact: Almost none of the analysts was bullish on gold! A number of them gave me reason upon reason why gold was going to fall even lower.

Everyone now pretends they were buying gold back then. But of course if they had been, gold wouldn't have fallen as low as it did.

I actually know two investors who really were buying. Everybody else rolled their eyes or laughed at them.

Gordon Brown, Britain's hapless and accident-prone prime minister, was the chancellor of the exchequer, or Treasury secretary, at the time. He chose to sell more than half of Britain's entire gold reserves near the lows. According to Her Majesty's Treasury, the government sold about 395 tonnes in 17 auctions between 1999 and 2001, raising around $3.5 billion.

The average sale price worked out at around $275 per troy ounce. At today's price of $1,178, those same 395 tonnes would sell for $15 billion. Put it another way, the move cost Her Majesty's government, or the British taxpayer, a stunning $11.5 billion in lost profits.

Hindsight is 20-20. (The Treasury also made back a small amount of those losses by moving some of the money in currencies like the euro, which have risen.) What is important here is that Brown's move was not especially controversial at the time.

Yes, some people warned it was a bad move, but they were a small minority. Some in the City of London criticized the way the government handled the sale. Yet the overall direction of the move -- cutting Britain's holdings of the "barbarous relic" of gold for more "productive" assets -- enjoyed broad support among the financial community.

Indeed, around the same time other European central banks (notably the Swiss, Dutch and Belgian governments) quietly sold even more gold than Britain did -- more than 2,000 tonnes in all.

(An aside: The U.S. Treasury kept its 8,134 tonnes. These show up in the national accounts as an asset of just $11 billion, because for historic reasons the gold is booked at just $42 an ounce. But at today's prices, the gold is really worth $308 billion, and account for the bulk of the U.S. government's entire foreign-currency reserves.)

Ten years ago, pension funds and institutional investors around the world held little gold, if any. Merrill Lynch's monthly survey of institutional fund managers, probably the best barometer of their collective sentiment, didn't even include a question about gold until I (as it happens) asked them to start about five or six years ago.

Gold was such a nonissue that neither Merrill Lynch nor the fund managers had noted the absence.

This is how, on the financial markets, a big bear market tends to die. Not in a dramatic hail of gunfire, like Wall Street last March, but quietly, unnoticed, in the night of old age.

No, this doesn't mean we necessarily have to see new lows in stocks. Financial markets don't function like clockwork. It is notable that even fund legend Jeremy Grantham, a long-standing bear, thinks we probably did see the lows last March. (My own preference, as an investor, is to buy good-quality companies when they look cheap, regardless of what I think of the market or the economy.)

But history says a generational bull market, like Wall Street from 1982 to 1999, is usually followed by a generational bear market. I'd feel a lot more comfortable about stocks if everyone had lost interest completely, like they did in gold 10 years ago.

Source: http://www.marketwatch.com/story/gold-run-a-reason-to-be-wary-of-the-stock-market-2009-11-30
 
Green.view

Fuelling fears

Nov 30th 2009
From Economist.com

A uranium shortage could derail plans to go nuclear to cut carbon emissions

There is an awesome amount of energy tied up in an atom of uranium. Because of that, projections of the price of nuclear power tend to focus on the cost of building the plant rather than that of fuelling it. But proponents of nuclear energy””who argue, correctly, that such plants emit little carbon dioxide””would do well to remember that, like coal and oil, uranium is a finite resource.

Some 60% of the 66,500 tonnes of uranium needed to fuel the world’s existing nuclear power plants is dug fresh from the ground each year. The remaining 40% comes from so-called secondary sources, in the form of recycled fuel or redundant nuclear warheads. The International Atomic Energy Agency, which is a United Nations body, and the Nuclear Energy Agency, which was formed by the rich countries that are members of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, both reckon that, at present rates, these secondary sources will be exhausted within the next decade or so.

Once every two years the two agencies publish what is considered the best estimate of global uranium stocks, “Uranium: Resources, Production and Demand”, colloquially known as the Red Book. It estimates that there is enough unmined uranium to supply today’s nuclear power stations for at least 85 years for less than $130 per kilogram. But Michael Dittmar, a researcher at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich, thinks they are mistaken. He has studied the uranium supply and argues, in a recent series of papers, that shortages will drive the nuclear renaissance to an untimely end.

Dr Dittmar has unpicked the most recent Red Book numbers on primary production and asserts that they are founded on an alarmingly weak basis. The Red Book is compiled from questionnaires, each of which is handled differently in the countries to which it is sent. The forms might be completed by any number of different government agencies, with added input from mining companies. All, of course, will have their own agenda about the matter. He concludes, “The accuracy of the presented data is certainly not assured.” Dr Dittmar goes on to speculate about the accuracy of a great many figures, both of the amount of uranium that is known to exist, and estimates of how much more might be available. He predicts that shortages of uranium could begin as early as 2013.

For its part, the World Nuclear Association, a nuclear-industry body, argues that if uranium becomes more expensive, mining companies will devise cleverer ways of extracting it””from rock, other elements or even from seawater. Its estimates put the demand in 2030 at anywhere between 42,000 and 140,000 tonnes.

Although your correspondent suspects that Dr Dittmar is probably being overly pessimistic, he is inclined to agree with him that the Red Book’s precise assessments of what will be economically sensible over 85 years are far from accurate. But there are two other factors that could come into play. One is that there may eventually be enough economic incentive for the countries with weapons stockpiles of uranium to release much of it for warmth and peace.

The other is that the International Energy Agency thinks that nuclear power could more easily weather a storm in fuel markets. A 50% increase in the price of uranium would, the agency predicts, cause only a 3% rise in the cost of the electricity it generates, compared with 20% for coal and 38% for gas.

Either way, none of the figures take into account nuclear “new-build”. Where there is an economic incentive to extract more of a resource, industry has a long history of developing technology to do it. Just do not bet on electricity from nuclear power ever becoming too cheap to meter.
 
Forbes.com

Point Of View
Income During Inflation
Steve Hanke, 12.14.09

Even as the Dow sits above 10,000, the public remains justifiably anxious about the state of the economy. The Federal Reserve has worked overtime to convince the public that it has saved the economy from a meltdown, but with unemployment at a 26-year high and the dollar tanking, it's a hard sell. What most people easily understand is that the Fed has produced a monetary time bomb. Since August 2008 the monetary base (bills in circulation plus bank credits at Federal Reserve banks) has increased
by 137%. If not defused, this bomb will eventually explode into inflation. We are told by Fed Chairman Ben S. Bernanke and other members of the Fed's bomb squad not to worry. They assert that they know how and when to disarm the bomb.

Such assertions are a stretch. After all, it was the Fed's ultraloose monetary policy and disregard for the value of the greenback that fueled the asset bubbles that burst and set off the panic and subsequent destruction of jobs and wealth.

The time bomb hasn't exploded yet because, for now, the expansion in the monetary base has not given rise to a comparable expansion in a broader measure of the money supply called M2. That's the monetary base, plus demand deposits (commercial and individual) at banks, traveler's checks, savings accounts, time deposits and money market mutual funds.

The key here is something called the money multiplier, which is M2 divided by the monetary base. The multiplier measures, in a sense, the inflationary bang from every buck the Fed creates. In August 2008 the multiplier was 9.1. By December 2008 it had collapsed to 4.9 and since then has declined along an irregular path to 4.2. When the demand for the more narrowly defined kind of money goes down, as it eventually will, the money multiplier will move back into a normal range of 8 to 9. That is, the dollars manufactured by the Fed will give rise to more money (broadly defined) burning holes in people's pockets. An excess of money in spenders' hands is a recipe for inflation. This is when the Fed will need to shrink its balance sheet, but it will not be willing to do so because unemployment will probably still be elevated. In this scenario inflation expectations will become unhinged and inflation will accelerate.

With the Fed intent on keeping interest rates artificially low for an extended period of time, some of my previous recommendations should still work well. In September I recommended tapping into gold and commodities via the SPDR Gold Shares (GLD), iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) and PowerShares DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC). Since then, these funds have appreciated by 13% to 15%, while the S&P 500 has notched a 9.2% gain. Retain these positions to protect your portfolio from the Fed.

With the inflationary wolf at the door, what's an income investor to do? Go for dividends.

Leggett & Platt (LEG, 20), a manufacturer with a product line that started out as bedsprings and veered off into things like parts for farm machinery and retail shelving, generates plenty of cash, even when sales slump. The dividend, which eats up 50% to 60% of earnings, was raised last year and now comes to an annual 5% of the share price. Management has also spent cash on stock buybacks, shrinking the number of shares outstanding by 15% over the past three years.

Philip Morris International (PM, 50) is the second-largest tobacco company in the world. PM claims almost 16% of the non-U.S. cigarette market, a big plus for dollar bears. The market is currently pricing in a revenue growth rate that is lower than what the company has enjoyed over the past five years. The yield is 4.56%.

With its acquisition this year of Alltel, Verizon Communications (VZ, 30) has a customer base equal to 30% of the U.S. population. Annual revenue growth over the past ten years has averaged 11.9%. But Verizon is not receiving much credit for its rapidly growing wireless business (it owns 55% of Verizon Wireless). This segment is growing at an annual rate of 17% and is now larger than the wire-line side of the business. The dividend yield is 6.4%.

Kellogg (K, 53) has a yield of only 2.8%, but its dividend is well covered (it uses up only 44% of earnings) and has enjoyed seven increases over the past ten years. The cold cereal company gets 34% of its revenue from outside North America. That portion will go up, so here is another hedge against a weak dollar, as earnings abroad get translated into EPS gains here. Wall Street is expecting mediocre growth--too pessimistic. Take a bite.

Steve H. Hanke is a professor of applied economics at The Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore and a senior fellow at the Cato Institute in Washington, D.C. Visit his homepage at www.forbes.com/hanke.
 
From Bear to Bull
James Grant (USA)
wsj.com
September 20, 2009


James Grant argues the latest gloomy forecasts ignore an important
lesson of history: The deeper the slump, the zippier the recovery.

By JAMES GRANT

As if they really knew, leading economists predict that recovery from our Great Recession will be plodding, gray and jobless. But they don't know, and can't. The future is unfathomable.

Not famously a glass half-full kind of fellow, I am about to propose that the recovery will be a bit of a barn burner. Not that I can really know, either, the future being what it is. However, though I can't predict, I can guess. No, not "guess." Let us say infer.

The very best investors don't even try to forecast the future. Rather, they seize such opportunities as the present affords them. Henry Singleton, chief executive officer of Teledyne Inc. from the 1960s through the 1980s, was one of these enlightened opportunists. The best plan, he believed, was no plan. Better to approach an uncertain world with an open mind. "I know a lot of people have very strong and definite plans that they've worked out on all kinds of things," Singleton once remarked at a Teledyne annual meeting, "but we're subject to a tremendous number of outside influences and the vast majority of them cannot be predicted. So my idea is to stay flexible." Then how many influences, outside and inside, must bear on the U.S. economy?

Though we can't see into the future, we can observe how people are preparing to meet it. Depleted inventories, bloated jobless rolls and rock-bottom interest rates suggest that people are preparing for to meet it from the inside of a bomb shelter.

The Great Recession destroyed confidence as much as it did jobs and wealth. Here was a slump out of central casting. From the peak, inflation-adjusted gross domestic product has fallen by 3.9%. The meek and mild downturns of 1990-91 and 2001 (each, coincidentally, just eight months long, hardly worth the bother), brought losses to the real GDP of just 1.4% and 0.3%, respectively. The recession that sunk its hooks into the U.S. economy in the fourth quarter of 2007 has set unwanted records in such vital statistical categories as manufacturing and trade inventories (the steepest decline since 1949), capacity utilization (lowest since at least 1967) and industrial production (sharpest fall since 1946).

It isn't just every postwar disturbance that sends Citigroup Inc. (founded in 1812) into the arms of the state or has General Electric Co. (triple-A rated from 1956 to just this past March) borrowing under the wing of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. Neither does every recession feature zero percent Treasury bill yields, a coast-to-coast bear market in residential real estate or a Federal Reserve balance sheet beginning to resemble that of the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe. Yet these things have come to pass.

Americans are blessedly out of practice at bearing up under economic adversity. Individuals take their knocks, always, as do companies and communities. But it has been a generation since a business cycle downturn exacted the collective pain that this one has done. Knocked for a loop, we forget a truism. With regard to the recession that precedes the recovery, worse is subsequently better. The deeper the slump, the zippier the recovery. To quote a dissenter from the forecasting consensus, Michael T. Darda, chief economist of MKM Partners, Greenwich, Conn.: "[T]he most important determinant of the strength of an economy recovery is the depth of the downturn that preceded it. There are no exceptions to this rule, including the 1929-1939 period."

Growth snapped back following the depressions of 1893-94, 1907-08, 1920-21 and 1929-33. If ugly downturns made for torpid recoveries, as today's economists suggest, the economic history of this country would have to be rewritten. Amity Shlaes, in her "The Forgotten Man," a history of the Depression, shows what the New Deal failed to achieve in the way of long-term economic stimulus. However, in the first full year of the administration of Franklin D. Roosevelt (and the first full year of recovery from the Great Depression), inflation-adjusted gross national product spurted by 17.3%. Many were caught short. Among his first acts in office, Roosevelt had closed the banks. He had excoriated the bankers, devalued the dollar, called in the people's gold and instituted, through the National Industrial Recovery Act, a program of coerced reflation.

"At the business trough in 1933," Mr. Darda points out, "the unemployment rate stood at 25% (if there had been a 'U6' version of labor underutilization then, it likely would have been about 44% vs. 16.8% today. . . ). At the same time, the consumption share of GDP was above 80% in 1933 and the household savings rate was negative. Yet, in the four years that followed, the economy expanded at a 9.5% annual average rate while the unemployment rate dropped 10.6 percentage points." Not even this mighty leap restored the 27% of 1929 GNP that the Depression had devoured. But the economy's lurch to the upside in the politically inhospitable mid-1930s should serve to blunt the force of the line of argument that the 2009-10 recovery is doomed because private enterprise is no longer practiced
in the 50 states.

To the English economist Arthur C. Pigou is credited a bon mot that exactly frames the issue. "The error of optimism dies in the crisis, but in dying it gives birth to an error of pessimism. This new error is born not an infant, but a giant." So it is today. Paul A. Volcker, Warren Buffett, Ben S. Bernanke and economists too numerous to mention are on record talking down the recovery before it fairly gets started. They collectively paint the picture of an economy that got drunk, fell down a flight of stairs, broke a leg and deserves to be lying flat on its back in the hospital contemplating the wages of sin. Among economists polled by Bloomberg News, the median 2010 GDP forecast is for 2.4% growth. It would be a unusually flat rebound from a full-bodied downturn.

***

The Fed's voice is among the saddest in the lugubrious choir of bearish forecasters, and for good reason. By instigating a debt boom, the Bank of Bernanke (and of his predecessor, Alan Greenspan) was instrumental in causing our troubles. You might have thought that it would therefore see them coming. Not at all. Belatedly grasping how bad was bad, it has thrown the kitchen sink at them. And it maintains this stance of radical ease lest it get the blame for a relapse. However, by driving money market interest rates to zero and by setting all-time American records in money-printing ($1.2 trillion conjured in the past 12 months), the Fed is putting the value of the dollar at risk. Its wide-open policy all but begs our foreign creditors to ask the fatal question, What is the dollar, anyway? Why, the dollar is a scrap of paper, or an electronic impulse, the value of which is anchored by the analytical acuity of the monetary bureaucracy that failed to predict the greatest financial crackup since the 1930s.

The Fed may be worried about something else. By sitting on interest rates, it is distorting every business and investment decision. If mispriced debt was the root cause of the narrowly-averted destruction of global finance, the Fed is well on its way to setting the stage for some distant (let us hope) Act II. In the meantime, ultra-low interest rates have lit a fire under the stock and debt markets.

By rallying, equities and corporate bonds not only anticipate recovery, but they also help to bring it to fruition. By opening their arms wide to such previously unfinanceable businesses as AMR Corp., parent of American Airlines, and Delta Air Lines Inc., the newly confident credit markets are implementing their own stimulus program. "Reflexivity" is the three-dollar word coined by the speculator George Soros to describe the dual effect of market oscillations. Not only does the rise and fall of the averages reflect economic reality, but it also changes it. One year ago, the Wall Street liquidation stopped world commerce in its tracks. Today's bull markets are helping to revive it.

I promised to be bullish , and I am (for once)””bullish on the prospects for unscripted strength in business activity. So, too, is the Economic Cycle Research Institute, New York, which was founded by the late Geoffrey Moore and can trace its intellectual heritage back to the great business-cycle theorist Wesley C. Mitchell. The institute's long leading index of the U.S. economy, along with supporting sub-indices, are making 26-year highs and point to the strongest bounce-back since 1983. A second nonconformist, the previously cited Mr. Darda, notes that the last time a recession ravaged the labor market as badly as this one has, the years were 1957-58 ””after which, payrolls climbed by a hefty 4.5% in the first year of an ensuing 24-month expansion. Which is not to say, he cautions, that growth this time will match that pace, only that growth is likely to surprise by its strength, not weakness.

And that is my case, too. The world is positioned for disappointment. But, in economic and financial matters, the world rarely gets what it expects. Pigou had humanity's number. The "error of pessimism" is born the size of a full-grown man””the size of the average adult economist, for example.

[*** I had to delete four paragraphs for publication]
 
December 05, 2009

That Was The Week That Was … In Australia

By Our Man in Oz
www.minesite.com/aus.html

Minews. Good morning Australia. It looks like it was a strong start and a weak finish on your market last week.

Oz. That sums it up very neatly. The week started with a bang, and then faded badly on Friday, though not by enough to wipe out all of the earlier gains. The challenge will be seeing how we open next week, because the big fall in the gold price after we closed will have shaken local investors. Sticking with what we know, the Australian market, as measured by the all ordinaries index, added 2.6 per cent last week; the metals index rose by 3.3 per cent; and the gold index added two per cent. It could have been so much better, as the metals index was up by 5.7 per cent before Friday’s sell-off. Factors weighing on our market included lower commodity prices, a third consecutive monthly increase in official interest rates, and a big political shake-up which caused the dumping of planned key emissions trading laws.

Minews. Surely your investors were happy with the political changes?

Oz. It seems that way. The national government has gone a long way out on a limb to appease the global warming zealots. For some reason the government seems to think that if we put a high price on carbon, or to put it another way, an additional tax on most of Australia’s export industries, we will be whiter than white when the true believers, bongo players, and flag wavers gather in Copenhagen next week. Australia represents about 1.5 per cent of the global economy, is in the relatively pollution-free southern hemisphere, and whatever we do will be cancelled out in about a week by new coal-fired power stations in China, so there’s a certain futility to the government’s posturing.

Minews. And that led to the dumping of your Opposition leader too?

Oz. It was a big factor. The “climategate” fiasco is playing well down this way, not so much because someone at an obscure British university appears to have fiddled with global temperature data, but more because of the way the zealots have howled down any attempt at scientific debate, and now look like they have been caught with the fingers in the lolly jar.

Minews. Let’s stick with the stock market - money is always simpler than politics.

Oz. Agreed. The gold sector, as mentioned, was a little nervous towards the end of last week and will be a lot more nervous on Monday. Most local gold stocks gained ground, with a few stand-out performers, but the overall tone was choppy. Iron ore stocks behaved in a similar manner. Base metals were mixed, and uranium was generally stronger, thanks to the spot price putting on a few dollars during the week. Another interesting development was that a handful of new floats made it safely onto the market, but next week is shaping as a critical test of investor appetite for risk, with six new mining stocks scheduled to list over five days.

Minews. Gold first, please.

Oz. The newsmakers among the gold stocks included Morningstar (MCO) and Ramelius (RMS) which caught the eyes of investors courtesy of discovery and development. Morningstar added A10 cents to A44.5 cents after reporting a fabulous visible gold intersection assaying 137.4 grams a tonne (4.4 ounces) from the Maxwell Reef at its Morning Star mine north of Melbourne. The closing price on Friday was a little short of the stock’s 12 month high of A49 cents, reached the previous day. Ramelius, meanwhile, rose by A9 cents to A59 cents, and that was enough to cop a speeding fine from the ASX. In response, management pointed out that the company’s Wattle Dam mine should reach full production next month.

Another solid upward move in the gold space came from Silver Lake (SLR), which hit a 12 month high of A$1.40 on Thursday, before dropping back to close up A11.5 cents over the week at A$1.29. That strong rise came in the wake of what is probably the best assay from anywhere in Australia over the past year, 555 grams a tonne (17.8 ounces) over an admittedly thin 0.35 metres - one foot to old timers. It probably represents the drill bit passing through a nugget. That result came from the Daisy East discovery zone, which lies just 40 metres east of the company’s main Daisy Milano mine. The company also reported a hit over 1.3 metres of core assaying 129 grams a tonne.

After that it was a mixed picture, as the upward movement earlier in the weak was reversed on Friday. Kingsgate (KCN) galloped up to a 12 month high of A$10.30 on Thursday, before being slam-dunked on Friday to close the week at A$9.75 for a gain of just A2 cents. Troy (TRY) got to A$2.74, on Thursday, which was a gain at that stage of A10 cents, but ultimately closed the week down A4 cents, at A$2.60. Resolute (RSG) hit A$1.26 early but closed at A$1.16, down A1 cent. Tanami (TAM) continues its climb back from the desperate days of a year ago, when its share price plunged to as low as A1.4 cents. On Friday it hit A7.5 cents in early trade, before closing at A7.1 cents for a gain of A0.3 of a cent on the week. Elsewhere, Adamus (ADU) added A3 cents to A47.5 cents, and Chalice (CHN) rose by A2 cents to A61 cents, but was trading as high as A68 cents at one stage on Friday, a 12 month high.

Minews. Iron ore next, please.

Oz. It was more of a mix in iron ore than it was in gold, but share prices were nonetheless generally up. Murchison (MMX) was the star, as the market continued to digest an upbeat presentation put together for the benefit of European and North American investors. Murchison added A31 cents to A$1.96, but did trade up to A$2.04 on Thursday. Royal Resources (ROY) attracted support for its promising Razorback project in South Australia, rising by A8 cents to A26 cents. Giralia (GIR) continues its strong recovery, adding another A18 cents to A$1.40. IMX (IXR) benefited from a joint development deal with OZ Minerals (OZL), rising by A6.5 cents to A39.5 cents. Dragon Energy (DLE) joined the iron ore game through a deal to acquire a package of tenements. That news which lifted the company’s shares by A5 cents to A26 cents. Finally, Fortescue Metals (FMG) gained A28 cents to A$4.29. Going down, Golden West (GWR) ended a storming recovery with a fall of A14 cents to A73 cents, and Iron Ore Holdings (IOH) also retreated after a stellar run, losing A3 cents to A$1.59. Also weaker, Brockman (BRM) eased back by A4 cents to A$1.95. Aquila (AQA) had a yo-yo of a week, rising early to a high of A$11.50, and then falling sharply to close at A$9.45, down A32 cents overall, after it announced a bonus share issue.

Minews. Over to base metals.

Oz. Copper up. Nickel down. Zinc flat. That’s the sector in a nutshell. PanAust (PNA) was among the better performers in copper. The company is enjoying strong production from its Phu Kham mine in Laos, and added A8.5 cents over the week to close at A58.5 cents. OZ Minerals rose by A4 cents to A$1.22 after giving an upbeat strategy presentation. Equinox (EQN) gained A19 cents to A$4.24, and Hillgrove (HGO) announced positive steps towards development at its historic Kanmantoo mine near Adelaide, news which stimulated an eye-catching rise of A6 cents to A35.5 cents. On the way down, Citadel (CGG) fell A4 cents to A39 cents, Syndicated (SMD) shed A2 cents to A19 cents, and Sandfire (SFR) was A10 cents weaker at A$3.69.

Best of the pure nickel stocks was Pacific Ore (PSF), which rose by A0.9 cents to A4 cents after it announced a deal to run a bacterial leaching trial on low-grade nickel ore from the Forrestania mine owned by Western Areas (WSA). Western itself added A15 cents to A$5.22. On the way down, Mincor (MCR) fell A14 cents to A$1.85, Minara (MRE) was A3 cents weaker at A78 cents, and Poseidon (POS) dropped A1.5 cents to A25.5 cents. Zinc stocks were modestly stronger. Terramin (TZN) added A4 cents to A79 cents, and Perilya (PEM) gained A6 cents to A57 cents.

Minews. Uranium and specials to close, please.

Oz. Most uranium stocks performed well as the price of the fuel rose. Mantra (MRU) added A21 cents to A$4.37, but did get to A$4.47 in early Friday trade. Manhattan (MHC) continued to attract strong support, rising another A29 cents to A$1.35. Berkeley (BKY) reported a positive scoping study on its Salamanca project, and that news drove the stock A27 cents higher to A$1.35. Meanwhile, Raisama (RAI) made a strong debt as a new float with its A35 cent shares opening at A50 cents and closing out their first week at A55 cents.

Minews. And specials?

Oz. One worth mentioning, though it’s technically not a miner. Ausdrill (ASL) the drill rig operator, added A26 cents to close at A$2.00, just short of a 12 month A$2.02 high reached early on Friday. What’s interesting about that move is that investors are placing bets on a classic “pick axe” seller in the belief that exploration spending will rise in future years as the resources boom re-gathers strength.

Minews. Thanks Oz, an interesting point to close on.
 
Gold Isn’t the Best Protection Against Inflation
Matthew Lynn
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601039&sid=aF1zfwwrcA2w#

Dec. 8 (Bloomberg) -- Economic chaos? The dollar crumbling? Central banks printing money like crazy? Probably the only real surprise about the surge in gold prices over the last few months is that it took so long to arrive.

Last week gold touched an all-time high of $1,227.50. Back in September it was still less than $1,000. Chalk that up as a victory for the gold bugs.

This week, the price is heading down, dropping below $1,200. Chalk that up as a victory for the gold skeptics, who regularly point out that the metal’s value is just a sentimental memory from a long-buried era.

In reality, while investors are right to be nervous about inflation, maybe they are catching on that it’s wrong to see gold as the best hedge against a general rise in prices. There are plenty of alternatives: equities, property, oil, luxuries or private-equity funds should prove just as effective a way of shielding yourself.

It isn’t hard to figure out why investors had been getting interested in gold again. Central banks are pumping freshly minted money into the system. A few hundred years of economic history says that eventually this will lead to inflation. It might be next year, or the year after. It doesn’t make much difference -- it will arrive sooner or later, and you’ll need to get your portfolio in shape before it does.

Alloyed Record

But gold? Whether it’s a hedge against inflation depends on where you want to start drawing the graph. Back in 2002, gold was less than $300. If you bought it then, you’d certainly have protected yourself against rising prices -- and made a fat profit as well. The 1990s were a different story. Gold started that decade at around $400, and ended it below $300. Not so great. As for the 1980s, forget it: gold lost almost half its value during that decade.

In reality, gold has a mixed record. Nor should you be surprised about that. A few industrial uses, and jewelry, aside, gold is valuable only insofar as other investors think it is valuable. By itself it isn’t necessarily worth anything. Nor does it generate interest or dividends. If the price doesn’t rise, you don’t get anything.

There isn’t much chance, either, of the world’s central banks making their currencies convertible into gold once again. They would bankrupt their governments in the process. It may secure itself a greater role as a reserve asset. But the gold standard isn’t about to be re-imposed.

In truth, while gold may have a role in protecting against inflation, there are plenty of alternatives. Here are five you should be thinking about -- particularly when you bear in mind that gold is already close to an all-time high.

Real-Estate Rebound

One, property. The price of real estate won’t always move exactly in line with inflation. And you might want to steer clear of the markets where there has yet to be much of a retreat from the exuberant prices of 2006 and 2007. Even so, if there is more money chasing a static amount of land and buildings, prices are going to rise.

Two, oil. They used to call it black gold and maybe they should again. It has already stopped being just stuff we put in our cars, and use to heat houses, and become an investment asset in itself. How else can we explain the fact that oil has ticked up past $70 a barrel even while we’re living through the worst global recession since World War II? Oil is already, in effect, an alternative to gold. The one difference is that you can put it in your car and drive somewhere -- making it far more useful than stuff good for little more than dental fillings and trinkets to wear around your neck.

Stock Picking

Three, equities. Moderate, persistent inflation in the 3 percent range is good for the kind of big, blue-chip companies that dominate the major global stock markets. They can edge up prices along with everyone else. And they can usually get away with increasing wages just a bit less than inflation, so cutting labor costs as well -- particularly as unions are far less powerful than they used to be. In those circumstances, the shareholders should do fine -- and their equities will more than keep up with rising prices.

Four, luxury goods and collectibles. Once inflation takes off, it is only real assets that will hold their value -- everything else is just paper, and that will be of dwindling use. Assets don’t get much more real than historic art, valuable antiques, vintage automobiles or fine wines. They should start to soar in price as the mega-rich realize they are among the few ways to protect wealth. And, heck, if you get it wrong, you can always hang them on the wall, or drink them.

Five, private-equity funds. This one might not be obvious. But a leveraged buyout firm buys well-established companies, in basic industries, and then loads them up with lots of debt, while hanging on to a little bit of equity. Inflation will effectively wipe out all that debt. The result? The equity that is left over will be worth far more.

Rate Squeeze

Of course, none of these will necessarily work in the long- term. The only real way to control inflation once it gets started is to raise interest rates high enough to create a deep recession, and so choke off rising prices. That’s what central bankers did in the late 1970s and early 1980s, and may do again sometime around 2015 or 2020. Once that happens, you’ll need to think again -- you might not want to be in property or equities.

That, however, is some way off. As we move into the early stages of an inflationary era, those five assets should do at least as well as gold, if not better.
 
Dec. 9, 2009

What in the world is going on?
Commentary: Historic precedent need not apply
By Todd Harrison

NEW YORK (MarketWatch) -- We've danced around some delicate topics through the years; subjects that many didn't want to hear, much less accept.

We flagged Fannie Mae (NYSE:FNM) and Freddie Mac (NYSE:FRE) in 2005 before most folks blinked an eye. Read more about Fannie Mae.

We mused in 2006 that seeds were being sown for something "entirely more depressing than a recession" as the markets climbed a slippery slope. Read keynote address from Minyanville retreat.

When we offered that Wall Street was technically insolvent in 2007 -- as financial stocks were near all-time highs -- we didn't make many friends. Read "Will the banking industry survive?"

When we pooh-poohed crude in the midst of the 2008 mania -- prior to the 75% oil slick -- and shared the variant view that lower energy prices would be equity negative, you could almost see conventional wisdom wince. Read "The oil of oy vey"

Indeed, we've made a lot of prescient observations -- along with our fair share of mistakes -- as we navigated the twists and turns of this wild world. Read "The upside of anger"

Class houses
One of our mainstay observations the last few years has been the percolating societal acrimony and an emerging class war between the "haves" and "have nots." Read "Class clowns"

As I wrote in my 2008 Themes,

"The middle class steadily eroded between the lifestyles of the rich and a struggle to exist. Structurally, my sense is that this dynamic continues. The wealthy will endure on a relative basis as the "other side" gets squeezed. What will change, in my view, is the perception of wealth. Black cards, fast cars and private jets will be frowned upon while philanthropy and other acts of selflessness will be embraced."

Channeling Kevin Depew, I continued, "If the 90s were about wealth, accumulation and consumption, 2008 will continue the mean reversion toward something altogether more austere, if not more sensible. Debt reduction and the rejection of (and guilt projection toward) materialism will continue what began in 2006 and 2007 as meditations on not just doing more with less, but doing less... period."

I continued that thread of thought in this year's themes when I shared,

"The age of austerity has officially arrived and we'll see a steady stream of social strife as the rejection of wealth increases in size and scope. While societal acrimony began to percolate last year, this dynamic will manifest through social unrest and geopolitical conflict as we edge ahead."

Now, please understand I'm an optimistic person at heart. The mission of Minyanville is to effect positive change through financial understanding, not beat a steady drum of dire predictions.

It's not always fun -- and not always right -- but as I told a producer in September 2008 when she whispered in my ear to be "more optimistic," immediately preceding the financial meltdown, my opinion isn't for sale.

What's my point? Glad you asked; I sometimes have a tendency to go on tangents.

We're not in Kansas anymore. What was once a craft -- trading was an art, not a science -- has turned into a polarizing profession predicated on predicting unforeseen actions of government entities and the corporatocracies they protect.

This isn't sour grapes or a random rant; it's simply what is, whether we like it or not.

Of mice and markets
Free market capitalism; the mere mention invokes deep-rooted responses.

For some, it's a longing for simpler times when an assimilation of primary trading metrics allowed for honest pay after a long day. For others, it's an opportunity to unleash vitriolic criticism on anyone and anything associated with Wall Street. Pick a side or stand aside, people, the nation is dividing as we speak.

I believe history books may one day look back at Shock & Awe -- or perhaps, 9/11 -- as the beginning of World War III when it was broadcast on CNN.

I'm not talking about a nuclear winter; I'm simply saying the entire global dynamic seismically shifted towards that short stretch of time and the needle is now pointing in an entirely unfortunate direction.

Society acrimony to social unrest to geopolitical conflict; it's a tri-fecta that won't pay off for anyone.

I share these thoughts with genuine intentions. When I read stories about Goldman Sachs Group (NYSE:GS) employees arming themselves with pistols so they're equipped to defend against a populist uprising, I take notice.

When I see Ahmadinejad thumb his nose at the U.S and Russia -- and call out Israel, which already has an itchy trigger finger -- I take notice.

When benevolent gestures and philanthropic efforts are immediately met with suspicion and distrust, I take notice.

I view the world through a somewhat binary lens. On one side, there's painful yet inevitable debt destruction that will eventually lead to a prosperous outside-in globalization. That scenario requires lower asset classes, a higher dollar and a lot of patience. The U.S likely won't lead the world higher but that's all right; a little humility will go a mighty long way.

On the other side, there is more credit creation, more stress on the system and cumulative imbalances that are destined to manifest in a meaningful way. I'm not smart enough to know how or when, but the "why" is self-evident. When the next phase of crisis arrives, it will be one of confidence that could shake our socioeconomic construct to the core.

Harsh? Yeah, it is. Imminent? It doesn't feel that way, and corporate credit markets suggest it's not. Looming and ever-present? You betcha, and I'll again use the magic word: cumulative . As social mood and risk appetites shape financial markets, we would be wise to watch for the next progression of problems, be it sovereign defaults, state bankruptcies or commercial real estate.

There are, as always, two sides to every trade and the bullish bent is akin to a relay race; the government-sponsored euphoria handed the baton to corporate America (who rolled mountains of debt and issued tons of equity) and the transfer of risk will land in the lap of an unsuspecting public. Yes, the best-case scenario doesn't cure the underlying disease; it simply masks the systems and pushes risk further out on the time continuum, perhaps all the way to our children.

Know this; it's of no benefit to me or my business to communicate this view but I'll always give it to you straight, sometimes right, sometimes wrong and always honest. I offer these thoughts not only to open some eyes, but also to ask for help. As we're apt to say, if you're not a part of the solution, you're part of the problem and society is simply a sum of those parts.

Now, more than ever, we need proactive problem solvers as we edge ahead through this uncertain world.


Source >> http://www.marketwatch.com/story/story/print?guid=DC149BF7-5DDD-41F0-AF75-D1B385CB1C85
 
December 12, 2009

That Was The Week That Was … In Australia

By Our Man in Oz
www.minesite.com/aus.html

Minews. Good morning Australia. Was that just a tough week for your miners, or was it the start of the Christmas slowdown?

Oz. It was a bit of both, really. The tumble in the gold price certainly knocked the gold stocks for six. Other sectors did less badly, and the overall market, when you wrap in the banks and industrials, actually held up quite well. Of the major ASX indices gold dropped by eight per cent. Metals and mining fell three per cent and the all ordinaries slipped 1.4 per cent. Looked at another way, it was four down days, saved slightly by a stronger Friday. But with Christmas parties in full swing, and a lot of tired people just happy to have made it to the end of 2009, there is undoubtedly a lot of lethargy about.

Having said that, it is worth looking at why everyone is a bit tired of financial markets at the moment. We’ve gone from boom to bust to boom again in less than two years. Forgetting, if possible, the great sell-off of 2008, and starting again in early December of that year, over the last 12 months the Australian dollar has shot up by 40 per cent, the metals index has risen by 52 per cent, the all ordinaries by 41 per cent, and the gold index by 34 per cent. There was one slight downer – the higher Australian dollar rubbed some of the gloss of local gold price.

Minews. Quite a recovery. Now for prices please, and keep it short today because there probably isn’t a lot to talk about.

Oz. Just one more general news item before prices. First Quantum’s decision to buy the mothballed Ravensthorpe nickel mine from BHP Billiton was the big mining event down this way. While some critics see it as an overly ambitious step, others recognise it as an opportunity for First Quantum to cut its excessive exposure to some of Africa’s more dodgy countries, and that acquiring a US$3 billion factory at 10 cents in the dollar has its attractions. Even after spending on rehabilitation the world-scale project will have been brought back into production for around US$600 million, an entry price sufficiently low to make a profit even if nickel prices stay low and production is limited to half the theoretical output of 50,000 tonnes of metal in concentrate from Ravensthorpe per year. In other words, this could be a company-transforming deal for First Quantum, and it wouldn’t be a surprise to see some of its investments offloaded to allow it to focus on Ravensthorpe. Such as its stake in Equinox Minerals (EQN).

Minews. Interesting. Now to prices, starting with gold.

Oz. It really doesn’t matter where we start, it’s virtually all in red ink. Among the gold stocks there was only one or two significant winners for the week. Adelaide Resources (ADN) reported excellent gold and copper assays from its Rover project at Tennant Creek in the Northern Territory. Best hit from a project which adjoins a very promising discovery being worked by Westgold Resources (WGR) was 55 metres at 3.36% copper and 0.16 grams of gold a tonne. There was also a lower intersection in the same hole measuring 31 metres and assaying 2.16 grams of gold and 2.23% copper. In better trading conditions Adelaide’s shares would have flown. As it was the stock managed a rise of A4 cents to A32.5 cents, but did set a 12-month high of A39.5 cents on Wednesday. Westgold failed to benefit, falling A3 cents to A40.5 cents. Also better off, Robust Resources rose by 48 cents to 110 cents after hitting some good grades in drilling at its Indonesian project, Romang Island.

Other gold movers included Silver Lake (SLR), down A20 cents to A$1.09, Kingsgate (KCN), down A52 cents to A$9.23, Troy (TRY), down A20 cents to A$2.40, Allied (ALD), down A7 cents to A34 cents, Chalice (CHN), down A15 cents to A46 cents and Resolute (RSG), down 23.5 cents to A93.5 cents. Also worse off, St Barbara (SBM) fell A4.5 cents to A31 cents after announcing another capital raising. Finally, Catalpa (CAH) fell A18 cents to A$1.54, a rough start in its freshly-merged condition.

Minews. I think we get the picture. Let’s move on quickly now, with iron ore next, please.

Oz. Two stocks up. Everyone else down. Murchison Metals (MMX), perhaps because it’s making up for lost ground after being ignored in previous weeks, rose by a stand-out A20 cents to A$2.14, while Jupiter Mines (JMS), one of the companies in the orbit of the legendary Brian Gilbertson, added A1 cent to A23.5 cents after announcing a big increase in the resource at its Mt Ida project. After that, it was all downhill. One company that might have gone against the trend was Golden West (GWR) which surprised the market by saying it would stick with its gold exploration effort as well looking for ways to get an early start on iron ore output. But that still wasn’t enough to prevent a share price fall of A8.5 cents to A64.5 cents. Meanwhile, Northern Iron (NFE) was hit hard after making a fresh statement on the sluggish production start at its Norwegian project, and dropped A13 cents to A$1.44. Atlas (AGO) reported the shipping of its first million tonnes of iron ore, and duly fell A11 cents to A$1.81. Iron Ore Holdings (IOH), which could do no wrong a few weeks ago, dropped by A14 cents to A$1.45. Elsewhere, Gindalbie (GBG) reported a minor setback to its Karara project and slipped A3.5 cents lower to A94 cents, while Mt Gibson (MGX) lost A9 cents to A$1.50 on chatter that its Koolan Island project is proving to be more difficult than first thought.

Minews. Uranium and coal next, where there seems to have been some news.

Oz. News, yes, but mostly bad news. PepinNini (PNN), which was a star in the 2007 uranium boom, shocked investors by declaring that its’ heavily promoted Crocker Well project, being explored with China’s SinoSteel, is uneconomic. PepinNini promptly crashed back by A11.5 cents to A21.5 cents, with all of that fall coming on Friday. Other uranium stocks were caught in the backwash. Paladin (PDN), another darling of the local market, fell A32 cents to A$3.86, perhaps hurt by reports of an earthquake close to its mine in Malawi. Manhattan (MHC) copped a bit of selling despite Alan Eggers star turn at last week’s Minesite forum, losing A9 cents to A$1.26. Mantra (MRU) lost A7 cents to A$4.30 after announcing a fresh capital raising, while Extract swam against the tide with a rise of A61 cents to A$8.28 after reporting more ore at its Namibian project.

Coal stocks were boosted by the float of Stanmore Coal (SMR) - foundation investors were rewarded with a handsome A16.5 cent gain on their A20 cent subscription price when the stock closed on Friday at A36.5 cents. Interest in the entire coal sector has been remarkably strong over the past few weeks, almost as if investors are gleefully defying the bongo-drummers and flag wavers at the Copenhagen climate summit. Gloucester Coal (GCL) also managed a small rise of A5 cents to A$6.44, but the rest of the coal sector sank. Coal of Africa (CZA) lost A7 cents to A$1.72, while Aquila (AQA), which is half coal, half iron ore, fell A32 cents to A$9.13.

Minews. Base metals and specials to finish, please.

Oz. Not a lot to report. Most copper, nickel and zinc stocks declined. Among the copper stocks, Sandfire (SFR) lost A26 cents to A$3.63, Exco (EXS) was down A1 cent to A23 cents, Citadel (CGG) was off half a cent to A38.5 cents, and Rex (RXM) fell A6 cents to A$1.78. On the up, Talisman (TLM) reported the acquisition of a tenement adjacent to Sandfire’s Doolgunna ground, and that was enough to add a truly modest half a cent to its share price, which ended the week at A83 cents. Redbank Copper (RCP) also did better, creeping up one-tenth of a cent to A1.4 cents.

All nickel stocks were weaker. Mincor (MCR) slipped A2 cents lower to A$1.83, despite good exploration news. Western Areas (WSA) fell A14 cents to A$5.08. Mirabela (MBN) was down A3 cents to A$2.48, and Panoramic (PAN) eased back by A11 cents to A$2.39. Zinc stocks barely moved. Perilya (PEM) fell A2.5 cents to A55 cents and Terramin (TZN) lost A4 cents to A75 cents.

The special worth mentioning was Nkwe Platinum (NKP) which we reported on in some detail during the week. It added A3.5 cents to A44 cents after coming out of a trading halt and announcing a successful capital raising, and promising a more detailed report on its Garatau project in the next few weeks. The most interesting part of Nkwe’s Friday announcement was that there are currently 11 drilling rigs working on Garatau, which is being explored in joint venture with Xstrata.

Minews Thanks Oz.
 
December 14, 2009

An Investment In Metals Still Looks A Better Bet Than One In Currencies

By Rob Davies
www.minesite.com/aus.html

Traders using The London Metal Exchange set prices for base metals that are used as benchmarks the world over. Most of them work for banks and many of them are based in London. The British government, it its wisdom, has proposed a bonus tax to discourage risk-taking by financial institutions. So far it is still unclear who exactly will be hit by the tax and what the impact on banks and employees will be.

But there is already a precedent of financial hotshots moving east to where the action is. Michael Geoghegan, chief executive of HSBC, and Antony Bolton, star fund manager at Fidelity announced this year that they are moving to Hong Kong to be closer to where the monetary action is - in and around China. Will metal traders follow them, to the detriment of the LME?

Meanwhile, news that China’s imports of copper rose 10 per cent in November to 290,000 tonnes, and that smelter production increased by six per cent to 421,000 tonnes has only served to reinforce the point that the centre of gravity in the metals industry is moving east.

The trick for governments and for money managers will be to ensure that the finance associated with the metals industry doesn’t all go the same way. Fortunately the UK, the USA and Europe all live in a democratic meritocracy. So theoretically, only the very best people, selected by their peers, end up running the country and the great institutions of finance. Surely these same people can be relied on not to push business and commerce into what is still a communist dictatorship where promotion is anything but transparent. Can’t they?

This particular week metals traders decided that the continued strength of the dollar was a good reason to mark metal prices down. Metals did not suffer because capitalists suddenly decided they liked the dollar a lot more. It was more a case that the hidden tensions in the euro bubbled to the surface. The risks of a major financial accident in Greece, Ireland, Spain and Italy have all grown in recent weeks, and no one is entirely sure what that means for the euro. Better sell it just in case.

“What shall we buy instead? Hummm… well, there is sterling… No forget that..." Which just leaves the yen and the dollar. Neither of those currencies rewards investors with much in the way of interest. Oddly gold, which pays none at all, and which is the usual haven in terms of uncertainty, suffered in these circumstances, and fell 1.6 per cent to US$1,114 an ounce.

Other metals fell too as the dollar gained, leaving copper at US$6,805 a tonne, and nickel at US$16,465 a tonne. Aluminium, though, remained resilient and ended at US$2,163 a tonne, while lead and zinc gained ground to close the week out at US$2,259 and US$2,264 a tonne respectively.

Unfortunately, these metal price moves were not enough to stop Xstrata putting a US$2.5 billion red line through a whole host of its nickel, lead and zinc assets. A falling US dollar means that operations in Canada are no longer viable, Xstrata reckons. The write-down in the value of its custom smelters also reflects the increased dominance that China now has in the smelting business.

Effectively, what this announcement means is that at current exchange rates, the spot prices of nickel, lead and zinc are all at levels pretty close to the marginal cost of production. With that sort of underpinning to prices, metals look better bets than most currencies, even if they don’t pay any interest.
 
December 15, 2009

There’s Been Plenty Of Activity In Uranium Lately, Even If The Spot Price Still Leaves A Lot To Be Desired

By Sally White and Alastair Ford
www.minesite.com/aus.html

Russia spooked the uranium markets last week, and that was no help at all in a market that had already been weakening. Prices had in any case been easing back on the transfer of uranium by the US Department of Energy to New York-listed USEC, which operates the only enrichment facility in America. That created an environment in which the latest spot price is around US$45 a pound, five per cent lower than it was three months ago, and in which long term contract prices are also weakening.

But last week Russia decided to assert itself, broadcasting that it would be supplying the world with nuclear fuel in a couple of years, and making it sound as though it would flood the market. This new supply would be from the recycling of the country’s Cold War arsenal. Currently, Russia’s ageing nuclear arsenal is recycled for it by the US on a contract that runs out to 2013. Russia also said it would increase output from uranium mines and increase enrichment capacity.

The Russian supplies from old warheads are currently key to the global uranium market, accounting for 13 per cent of world supply, and helping to fill the current shortfall from mined output. In fact, most analysts expect Russian supplies to the US to continue after the contract expires, but to fall to around two thirds of current levels.

At Macquarie Securities, though, analyst Max Layton said concerns about global supply following the expiry of the Russia/US agreement were being overplayed. “The Russians will use it, sell it to the Chinese, or sell it as part of other reactor packages. From a global supply-demand balance perspective it doesn’t matter whether they sell it to the US”, he commented.

Whether that’s true or not, there’s no doubt that Russia has been pursing lucrative deals to supply fuel directly to US power companies. “Six commercial contracts have already been signed with US nuclear power plant operators”, said Ivan Dybov, spokesman for Rosatom’s civilian arm, Atomenergoprom.

Meanwhile, if the uranium price has been weaker, that weakness has not so far been felt on equity markets, or at least not directly. Uranium miners have been doing rather better than the mineral itself. The latest market valuation of uranium companies published by Resource Capital (RCR), and out last week, showed an average 12 per cent rise in value over the last month and of 353 per cent over the last 12 months. Canadian companies show a four per cent rise over the last month and 198 per cent on the last 12 months.

An increasing number of projects have gained mining licences – RCR lists among others Toronto quoted Mega Uranium, for Lake Maitland in Western Australia, and Australian quoted African Energy Resources for Chirundu in Zambia. Meanwhile, several uranium juniors have been making serious progress with development projects, including Manhattan Corporation, which is currently drilling in Australia, and which has been ably promoted by boss Alan Eggers the world over. Manhattan’s share price has increased markedly over the past six months, and Mr Eggers says he sees no reason why it won’t continue to rise. Before we commit on that, we’ll have to let the drill bit have its say, but it was interesting to see, in a recent presentation at our Minesite Christmas forum, a schematic in which Mr Eggers represented the number of nuclear power stations either at the commissioning stage, or at the planning stage. The overwhelming majority of these were in China.

That presents a likely dynamic which one or two mining company directors, including Andrew Bell of Red Rock, Clive Sinclair-Poulton of Beowulf, and Mark Reilly of Forte Energy have recently highlighted. The Chinese will increasingly be looking to lock up uranium supply to feed all these new power plants, while the Russian decommissioning can only go on for so long. Clive Sinclair-Poulton reckons that once the true scale of the Chinese requirements becomes clear – after the Chinese have already acquired most of what they need – then the upward pressure on the uranium price is likely to be substantial. Whether that will be felt next year remains to be seen, but there’s no doubt that uranium bulls have plenty to be cheerful about even if the short term price is weakening. And the way to play that seems to be in equities.
 
December 15, 2009

Aussie Fraudsters Hit With $11.5 Million Fine For Kazakh Resources Scam
www.minesite.com/aus.html

To all junior miners operating in the risky wilds of Kazakhstan, be of good cheer - a Supreme Court judgement issued on December 11th in Sydney, Australia, has awarded the equivalent of US$11.4 million in compensation, penalties, and costs against a group of lawyers who have been found guilty of engaging in dishonest business practices.

Justice Clifford Einstein ruled in October that the Kazakhstan-based law firm of Michael Wilson & Partners had been defrauded by three lawyers who had been employed by Wilson and who had secretly moonlighted to earn fees and share bonuses for stock market listings and other transactions involving several major Kazakh resource projects. The projects in question included among their number Sunkar Resources’ Chilisai phosphate project, and Frontier Mining’s Benkala copper project. Also tangled up in the legal web were Roxi Petroleum, Max Petroleum, Urals Gold and Ablai, as well as four other projects tied to these and other operators in the same region - Karamandybas (oil and gas), Ravninnoye (oil), Beibars Munai (oil), Lancaster, and Kangamiut (seafoods).

In his new order, Justice Einstein reiterated his finding from October - "the essence of the matter is that the defendants concealed these continuing activities from the plaintiff". Accordingly, the new judgement orders the lawyers to pay up what they gained unfairly in profit, and also to compensate Wilson & Partners for the cost of having to litigate across the globe for the recovery of its losses over the past three years. After itemizing invoices and share capital gains for each project transaction, the judge applied a 10 per cent discount, rejected a claim for compensation for losses in the Benkala copper project, and dismissed a claim for additional and exemplary damages as a punitive response to the alleged conspiracy of the defendant lawyers against Wilson. Total: US$3.5 million, plus €555,259, plus A$4 million.

"The plaintiff has succeeded in almost every aspect of its pleaded case against the defendants", Einstein ruled. "The usual rule as to costs, that they should follow the event, should apply" - another A$3.5 million. Grand total, US$11.4 million.

In his 216-page judgement, issued on October 6th, Einstein had ruled that John Emmott, Robert Nicholls, and David Slater had conspired together to exploit their positions in the Wilson law firm to breach their employment contracts and fiduciary duties by secretly creating a competing firm of their own, Temujin International, registered in the British Virgin Islands. Among the London Aim-traded listed companies targeted by the scheme, the court papers identify Sunkar, Frontier, Roxi, and Max.

In a summary of his findings of fact, Einstein J said the conspiracy had begun in 2005, as soon as Slater had arrived at Wilson's office in Kazakhstan from Australia, where he had been an in-house solicitor for the Westpac Banking Corporation. In a sequence of Almaty watering holes over several weeks, Slater and his co-conspirators created their cut-out company, calling it Temujin, a name they borrowed from the hero of the Mongol empire and the Kazakh steppes, Genghis Khan. Temujin was his original name.

Slater left Wilson’s firm almost immediately afterwards, in December of 2005. Nicholls, formerly a Sydney barrister and partner at Freehills, followed in March of 2006, while Emmott, who had been with Wilson since 2001, stayed on to keep the flow of Wilson’s client business moving out the backdoor to Temujin. He exited on June 30th 2006. Temujin’s new business was to advise Wilson clients on the purchase of formerly state-owned oil, gas, gold and mineral companies and the creation of financial vehicles to allow for their future listing on the Aim market.

In last week's judgement, Einstein separates the defendants, and itemizes his rulings on culpability and financial liability. Slater, Nicholls, several companies of the Temujin group, and an associated Kazakh lawfirm are to pay up collectively. Emmott is named by the judge in both rulings as culpable, but he was not a defendant in the Sydney court. He is currently under investigation by the authorities in Switzerland and the UK.
 
Top