Australian (ASX) Stock Market Forum

"The best place to be is in commodities"

October 20, 2009

A Night In The Pilbara, And Other Chinese Tales: Frugality Is The New Watchword For Fortescue, But The Australian Boom Rolls On

By Our Man in Oz
www.minesite.com/aus.html

If you’re sitting in London still somewhat bemused by the revival of the resources boom and the strength of the Australia economy, then an overnight stay in Western Australia’s Pilbara iron ore region might provide all the answers you’re looking for. In fact, it was at around 10pm on Sunday night, in preparation for a full day tour of the operations of Fortescue Metals Group (FMG), that the penny dropped for Minesite’s Man in Oz. There he was sleeping in Chinese-made “donga” - a fully-equipped flat, complete with washing machine and satellite television - in an Australian port city, getting ready to look at a Chinese ship being loaded with Australian iron ore. But wait, there’s more. The ore from FMG’s Cloudbreak mine had been delivered to Port Hedland in a Chinese-made railway wagon, riding on Chinese steel rails, and loaded via a Chinese-built shiploader, driven by an Australian crew.

The integration of the economies of these two radically different countries does not come more complete than that. A close parallel to the relationship between Australia (the quarry) and China (the factory) might be found in nature where remora (sucker fish) attach themselves to sharks to feed off the leftovers. In the case of Australia and China, it is China playing the role of shark, as it carves off a large helping of global economic growth, at the expense of the US and Europe, while Australia cruises along selling it the raw materials to do its job.

Minesite’s visit to Pilbara, which included a half-hour private chat with FMG’s founder and chief executive, Andrew Forrest, in the back-end of an ancient Fokker 100 commuter jet, confirmed what has been coming through in the numbers. Rather than decline, like other western economies, Australia has continued to grow throughout the global downturn, not by much, but grow nevertheless. Unemployment, tipped to soar by the boffins working in the cloistered silence of Canberra’s economic ministries, has not moved to within a bull’s roar of the forecast 8.5 per cent. It is holding at 5.7 per cent, and while job creation is always last in a rebound, that official number now looks silly, with accelerating growth triggering an uptick in interest rates, and with more rises expected before Christmas.

Forrest, effervescent as ever, and looking forward to a quiet night with his wife on their 18th wedding anniversary on Monday evening, is in no doubt that demand for resources from China will not slow for decades to come. Always a man with a tendency for hyperbole, he is now glowing in the spotlight of success. A 30-man (and woman) media pack hang off every word when he holds an impromptu press briefing on the edge of one of seven pits being worked at Cloudbreak, as his “surface miners” scrape away in the background as they hasten to meet his forecast of 40 million tonnes of ore shipped this financial year.

Rivals and critics, of which there remain many in Australia and overseas, are simply being overpowered by the force of Forrest’s personality. His absolute confidence in his own decisions is the stuff normally seen in rhino-hided politicians justifying outrageous expenses, or indeed, outrageous policies. But Forrest has put his own money into FMG (and been well rewarded with the title of Australia’s richest man and a fortune of some A$4 billion), and he has used the funds of willing shareholders and New York dentists via bonds issued in the US.

Perhaps the best way of putting into perspective what Minesite saw during this hot day and night in the field is to stack up the positives of what’s happening right now in Australia against the negatives. On the plus side, shipments of iron ore, and other commodities from Australia to China and other Asian economies, have barely missed a beat over the past 12 months. There was a scare at the end of 2008 and early 2009 when global trade ground to a halt because banks could not (or would not) finance cargoes, but that blip has been more than overcome. The best example of the strength of demand came in the third quarter report of Rio Tinto, one of FMG’s arch-rival in the Pilbara region, which last week revealed that shipments of iron ore were up 12 per cent.

Other plus-side evidence on the ground is a strong revival in exploration spending, and last week’s remarkable offer by BHP Billiton to acquire United Minerals Corporation for A$204 million. That single deal yelled “the boom is back!” more loudly than any other single event in the past year, and for several reasons. Firstly, because BHP Billiton was only one of four “tyre kickers” interested in UMC. Secondly, because the price set a new benchmark for undeveloped iron ore in the ground, and thirdly because BHP Billiton was clearly flagging that it is interested in dealing with mining minnows, if there’s a profit to be made which is, hopefully, a sign that the arrogance shown by the big miners is dissipating.

One day, when time and space permits, Minesite’s Man in Oz will try to explain a seminal event in 2003 when companies such as BHP Billiton and Rio Tinto were forced under State Government law to relinquish exploration tenements they had held for almost 40 years. Back then, in the pre-boom days, even the companies involved recognised that it was fair to apply “use it, or lose it” laws in order to open exploration acreage. But perhaps it was no surprise when people like Forrest, acting on the advice of his trusty second-in-command, Graeme Rowley, pegged almost everything surrendered, and smaller explorers, such as the Rhodes family pegged high-grade chunks such as the Railway tenement which ended up in UMC.

In Forrest’s words, at 30,000 feet over a Bundaberg rum and coke: “they [the majors] said it wasn’t a problem because one day they would just buy it back” – an astonishingly conceited view which failed to take the China boom into account, and failed to recognise that the door had been opened on their once closed shop. It is now companies such as FMG, Atlas Iron, BC Iron, Brockman Iron, Iron Ore Holdings, FerrAus, Giralia, Aquila, and a flotilla of smaller fry which has stampeded through the open door, that are willing to do the basics which BHP Billiton and Rio Tinto forgot – to explore, develop, be nice to customers, talk to investors and the media, and never assume that being a big company means you sit closer to God.

The negative aspects to what’s happening right now are related to the prevailing prices of raw materials and the corrosive effect of the rising value of the Australian dollar against the sinking US dollar in which most commodities are traded. Earlier this year iron ore prices took a 33 per cent haircut. Everyone knows that. What’s less often considered is the additional 20 per cent haircut caused by currency movements. It’s the corresponding fear of falling revenue which has caused FMG to adopt a new corporate slogan, on display in the Cloudbreak mine mess room: “Fortescue frugality”. Given that the food flowed freely, if not the booze because of alcohol restrictions on mine sites, it was obvious that the new-found frugality applies to operating costs. Rowley says that the aim is to slice A$400 million out of annual expenditure.

Overall, investors in far-away places can be reassured that the Australian resources boom is not only intact, it is building up speed again after a temporary diversion caused by the global financial crisis. Currency is a worry, but underlying demand from Asian customers is strong, and customers are keen to see supply lines not only kept open, but expanded. If there are problems ahead they fall into the category of speed bumps, not brick walls. Skilled tradesman are in short supply again, and will become even harder to find once the promised boom in liquefied natural gas gets underway next year. Professionals, such as engineers and geologists, are also commanding higher salaries, while on a personal note it is sad to report that car parks are once again getting hard to find in West Perth, and the price of a fish lunch at the infamous Black Tom’s bistro is rising. Fortunately, though, most talented scribblers can find a mining company somewhere within 50 metres to foot the bill.
 
October 20, 2009

Positive Noises In The Nuclear Space Bode Well For Uranium And Uranium Miners

By Sally White and Alastair Ford
www.minesite.com/aus.html

Nuclear energy was a key centre of attention in alternative energy markets last week, as the spot uranium price moved up sharply. The main news turning the market bullish was that the Belgian government has put back its plans to phase out nuclear power by ten years, although the country's nuclear energy producers will have to pay for the privilege of continued operation. The U308 price published last week by UX Consulting was up US$2.50 a pound at US$46.50

The Belgian Council of Ministers' decision follows on from recent recommendations from a specially founded expert group, and was set out in an announcement published by climate and energy minister Paul Magnette. A new nuclear agreement now stipulates that the country's nuclear producers make an annual 'contribution' to the country's budget.

Meanwhile, over in the UK, in its first annual progress report to parliament, the independent Committee on Climate Change (CCC) has said that the country must construct up to three new nuclear power plants by 2022 if it is to meet its greenhouse gas emission reduction targets.

Under current new build replacement plans the first new reactor would start up before the end of 2017 and the next follow in mid-2019. No other build projects are as firmly slated as those from EdF Energy, although other consortia, such as one by RWE and EOn, are working towards new-build in a similar timeframe.

Another bullish factor for the uranium price was the announcement of flat production figures this year from Energy Resources of Australia, producer of about a tenth of the world’s mined uranium. It expects that 2009 output will be similar to the previous two years. Third-quarter production increased four per cent to 1,405 metric tons, or 3.1 million pounds, from 1,349 tons a year earlier, the Darwin-based company said a statement. The company, controlled by Rio Tinto Group, says it will be expanding output at its Ranger mine in Northern Territory on indications of rising demand from power utilities. Energy Resources shares have climbed 40 percent in Sydney in 2009, compared with a gain of 30 per cent for the S&P/ASX 200 Index. The shares currently trade at around A$26.57 in Sydney.

Elsewhere in the sector, Areva of France, the world’s biggest builder of nuclear reactors, has announced that it is to build a new fuel-processing plant in Japan to more than double that country’s domestic capacity to meet anticipated demand growth. The plan is part of a joint venture with Mitsubishi and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, in which the French giant holds 30 per cent. Japan plans 12 new reactors to be built by 2019, as it increases nuclear dependence from 25 per cent in 2008 to at least 40 per cent by 2030, as part of efforts to reduce pollution blamed for global warming and to cut dependence on oil. Areva wants a bigger share of an estimated US$1.5 billion of revenues in this market.

Still, the upside in the immediate term may yet be limited. Broker RBC is advising its clients not to get too carried away. “In the past quarter, Uranium spot activity has been high, but supplies were plentiful and demand discretionary, resulting in weak prices. We do not expect this to change in the near term”, the broker told clients towards the end of last week. Longer term though, the outlook for uranium and uranium miners looks fairly positive.

RBC predicts growth in uranium demand of 4.7 per cent per year over the next 20 years. Much of that demand will be driven by China, which is expected to lead the way in new reactor builds over the next couple of decades. On the supply side, RBC forecasts an increase of 7.8 per cent annually until 2013, at which point the market will tilt back from surplus to deficit. Much of the new supply that’s coming on stream was stimulated by the uranium bull market of 2006-7, but RBC reckons that that still won’t be enough long term. “In our opinion”, says the broker, “the prevailing price is too low to stimulate sufficient supply to cover future reactor requirements”. Accordingly, RBC’s long-term forecast for the uranium price rises from US$45.00 per pound to US$55.00 per pound.
 
October 24, 2009

That Was The Week That Was ... In Australia


By Our Man in Oz
www.minesite.com/aus.html

Minews. Good morning Australia. How was your week?

Oz. Much quieter than recent weeks have been, with no extreme movement either way. The overall tone was up, but not by much. Gold stocks showed signs of recovery, though the high value of the Australian dollar continues to worry investors. Iron ore was again in the news in the wake of BHP Billiton’s bid for United Minerals (UMC). Brokers are busy hunting for look-alike deals. To put the flat week-on-week performance into perspective, both the all-ordinaries and gold indices on the ASX rose by less than half of one per cent, while the metals and mining index did a little better, putting in a rise of 1.9 per cent, thanks largely to healthy gains by BHP Billiton and Rio Tinto.

If there was a sector which outperformed it was uranium, thanks to troubles at the Olympic Dam mine in South Australia which has declared force majeure after a major hoist failure. Manhattan Corporation (MHC), one Minesite’s new members, was the strongest performer among the uranium stocks, putting in an impressive increase of A20 cents to A95 cents over the week, although it did hit a fresh all-time high of A$1.15 on Wednesday. The other sectors produced a handful of stars, but there were not many stocks which outperformed.

Minews. Let’s start our weekly trawl with the pick of the bunch then, uranium.

Oz. Before we run a call of the price card, let’s do a bit of a catch up on uranium news from down this way. The shut-down of a portion of BHP Billiton’s Olympic Dam mine was only one factor to stir the market. Another was the awarding of the first uranium mining lease in Western Australia since a ban on uranium mining was lifted last year. Mega Uranium, a Canadian-listed company was the winner, for its Lake Maitland project. The stock isn’t listed in Australia but a quick check of the Toronto exchange showed a small rise over the past week of about C0.2 cents to C8.2 cents in Mega’s price last week.

Minews. That’s the first time a report on the Australian stock market has started with a Canadian share price.

Oz. Globalisation at work. Canadians are very welcome in Oz. They might even brush up their cricket skills.

Minews. Enough chatter. More prices, please.

Oz. Finishing with uranium, the sector really was dominated by the speculative interest in Manhattan which has effectively doubled over the past month. Also on the move, with a rise of A1 cent to A21.5 cents was Northern Uranium (NTU), which is on the other side of an exploration joint venture with Manhattan. Elsewhere, Uranex (UNX) rose A3.5 cents, to recover some lost ground, but most other moves were modest. Toro (TOE) added half-a-cent to A20 cents and Top End Uranium (TEU) rose by A1 cent to A12 cents.

Among the sector leaders Extract (EXT) looked tired after a stellar upward run for much of the past 12 months, easing back by A3 cents to A$9.91. Forte (FTE) lost half a cent to A17 cents. Nimrodel (NMR) was steady at A9.9 cents, and Mantra (MRU) lost A3 cents to A$4.92.

Minews. Iron ore next, please.

Oz. The hot stock there was Iron Ore Holdings (IOH), which a few brokers see as a UMC lookalike, due to its 160 million tonne deposit of high-grade ore in its Iron Valley project. The company rose an eye-catching A18.5 cents to A$1.05. Another emerging player in the iron ore game is Hemisphere Resources (HEM). Hemisphere is reported to have won a ballot for an exploration tenement close to BHP Billiton’s Mining Area C, a location which is also close to UMC’s Railway deposit, currently the subject of a A$204 million takeover bid from BHP Billiton. On the market, Hemisphere shot up by A24 cents to A54 cents.

Minews. So, you’re raffling exploration ground now. How very Australian.

Oz. It sounds odd, but a ballot, which really does involve drawing names out of a hat, is the legally approved process used by the Mines Department to separate rival applications for the same ground lodged at roughly the same time. The ground Hemisphere believes it has won covers 30 square kilometres and lies roughly 15 kilometres north-east of Mining Area C.

Legacy Iron Ore (LCY) was another relatively unknown iron ore player to attract attention it announced plans to farm into tenements in the remote Robertson Range in the eastern portion of the Pilbara iron ore province. On the market Legacy, which listed in July last year, just in time to be hit by the global slowdown, added A4.7 cents to A9 cents. And yet another iron ore stock in the news, this time after four months on the sidelines, was Territory Resources (TTY) which has resolved complex debt issues. On the market, Territory posted a return opening sale of A25 cents compared with a previous close (on June 16) of A22.5 cents. The stock ended the week at A26 cents, with the modest rise a sign that some form of normality is returning after a difficult 12 months.

Among the more prominent iron ore players share price movements were modest. Atlas Iron (AGO) added A2 cents to A$1.89. FerrAus (FRS) did a little better with a gain of A2.5 cents to A80 cents, and Mt Gibson (MGX) gained A5 cents to A1.29. After that it was generally down. Fortescue Metals (FMG) fell A14 cents to A$4.03. Brockman (BRM) lost A10 cents to A$2.07. Giralia (GIR) slipped A6 cents lower to A$1.15. Gindalbie (GBG) was A2 cents lighter at A93.5 cents, and BC Iron (BCI) shed A1 cent to A$1.15.

Minews. Gold now, please.

Oz. A handful of solid rises dominated a generally lacklustre gold sector thanks to the Australian dollar’s rise back over US92 cents. The outstanding performer of the week was Corvette Resources (COV) which reported highly encouraging assays from its Camaro prospect, located about 60 kilometres south of the big Tropicana project of AngloGold and Independence (IGO). Best result to date is three metres at 40.33 grams of gold a tonne starting at a depth of 97 metres. On the market, Corvette rose A10 cents to A24 cents, but did hit a 12 month high of A27 cents on Thursday and in earlier trading on Friday.

Chalice (CHN) was another of the stronger stocks in a generally sluggish market as good news continues to flow following its merger with the Eritrean specialist, Sub-Sahara. On the market, Chalice added A5.5 cents to close at A44 cents, a fraction below the 12 month high of A45 cents reached during earlier Friday trade. Perseus (PRU) also attracted attention thanks to more good news from deep drilling at its Ayanfuri project in Ghana. It added A19 cents to A$1.73. Elsewhere, Resolute (RSG) shook off residual worries about its Syama mine in Mali, rising by A9 cents to A81.5 cents, and investors finally recognised that both sides in the Troy Resources (TRY) dispute have the same objectives for the company, and that recognition took Troy A18 cents higher to A$2.60.

Other gold moves included Adamus (ADU) and Catalpa (CAH), both easing back by A1 cent to A44 cents and A16 cents respectively. Eleckra (EKM) lost half a cent after a solid upward run. Kingsgate (KCN) fell a sharp A60 cents to A$7.85. Silver Lake (SLR) lost A8 cents to A84 cents, and Alkane (ALK) fell A1.5 cents to A45.5 cents.

Minews. Base metals, and specials to finish.

Oz. Not a lot from the base metal complex despite more positive results from the Doolgunna copper prospect of Sandfire Resources (SFR) where the latest drilling has revealed what looks to be a repeat orebody, which is what might be expected from the type of structures so far outlined. On the market, this fresh news of an intersection of 15 metres of massive sulphide was not enough to stop the stock from shedding A17 cents to A$3.89. Near-neighbour, Talisman (TLM) managed a rise of A1 cent to A$1.19. Other copper moves were insignificant. Rex (RXM) fell A5 cents to A$2.04. Equinox (EQN) added A5 cents to A$4.17. And Blackthorn (BTR) continues to make a solid recovery thanks to work at its Kitumba project in Zambia. Blackthorn rose by A4.5 cents to A38 cents.

Nickel stocks were generally down, or flat. Mincor (MCR) fell A4 cents to A$2.38. Independence (IGO) lost A15 cents to A$4.56, while Western Areas (WSA) added A9 cents to A$5.17. Zinc stocks were generally stronger, but not by much. Perilya (PEM) rose by A5 cents to A53 cents. Terramin (TZN) added A8 cents to A90 cents, but Bass Metals (BSM) lost A1.5 cents to A31.5 cents.

Minews. Any specials?

Oz. Not really. Lithium stocks were all over the shop. Galaxy (GXY) lost A28 cents to A$1.69 while Reed (RDR) added A11 cents to A59 cents. Manganese stocks were the same. Shaw River (SRR) added A3 cents to A23 cents, while Spitfire (SPI) lost A2.5 cents to A12 cents.

Minews. Thanks Oz.
 
October 26, 2009

Weakness In The West And Strength In The East Creates A Near Perfect Environment For Commodity Speculation

By Rob Davies
www.minesite.com/aus.html

To the surprise of no one except economists the UK recorded its sixth successive decline in GDP in the third quarter of 2009. That makes the current bout of economic upset the longest recession on record. Although worse than all its competitors in the West, the UK’s economy’s performance is at least comparable to its peers.

Contrast that with 8.9 per cent growth delivered by China over the same period and it is clear that the world economy is now clearly in two camps. More importantly, that dynamic now totally destroys the argument that the developing world can only grow if the Western world is sucking in imports. China, and its close neighbours, seems to have reached the critical stage when growth has become endogenous.

The implications of all this for the metal markets are obvious, and were underlined as copper hit a new high for the year of US$6,595 a tonne on a three month basis, a gain of 8.1 per cent on the week. It would be unfair, though, to ascribe all this gain to China, because there were helpful data from the US too. A 9.4 per cent increase in US housing starts was also a positive factor for base metals. This data is particularly important for copper as the average new US house now contains about 400 pounds of copper, mostly in plumbing and electrical applications.

As has been typical in this bull market, in which 2008 now looks increasingly like a small hiccup, positive news on the demand side was reinforced by news of problems on the supply side. Accident damage to the main haulage shaft at the Olympic Dam copper uranium mine in Australia means that its output will be reduced by 25 per cent until March 2010.

This development, plus the strike at the Spence Mine in Chile, just reminds consumers and traders that there is simply no fat in this industry despite the Great Recession in the West. That’s a view that the Chinese have been taking all along, as we heard from Frontier Mining’s boss, Erlan Sagadiev, at our recent Minesite forum. His potential Chinese customers just don’t believe there’s that much copper left.

But, although copper has the tightest fundamentals of all the base metals the whole complex had a strong week, and was aided by a continued decline in the dollar. The US currency fell one per cent in just one week. The effects of that fall helped fuel a 5.9 per cent rise in aluminium, which has the weakest short term prospects but the best in the long term. Also better off, nickel rose by 6.9 per cent to US$19,500. The two best performers, though, were lead and zinc. Lead increased by 12.6 per cent to US$2,436 per tonne, while zinc rose by 13.5 per cent US$2,258 per tonne.

This combination of weak economies in the West and strong economies in the east is almost a perfect environment for commodity speculation. The weakness of the major economies means that interest rates are at record lows, and likely to stay that way for a long time. So the cost of trading and speculation is small, and that encourages long positions.

On the other side strong demand means these positions can always be offloaded to willing buyers. Perhaps the only fly in the ointment for the mining industry is that a weak dollar is raising costs for miners outside the US. But at the current metal prices that is something most of them can happily live with.
 
November 01, 2009

Even If Marius Kloppers Is Right, A Short Term Correction Could Be An Opportunity For Long-Term Buyers

By Rob Davies
www.minesite.com/aus.html

A change of mood was detectable in the markets last week, but it is easier to quantify it than describe it. Pro-growth risk assets like equities and commodities gave ground over the week to end lower, in an atmosphere of more uncertainty than has been seen for some time. This sits oddly with the release of data showing the US economy probably emerged from recession during the third quarter. Maybe, like travellers to a holiday resort, it is sometimes better to travel than to arrive.

In the metal markets sentiment was not helped when Marius Kloppers, chief executive of BHP Billiton, stated at his company’s AGM that China has probably completed its restocking programme and that he expects demand to pull back a little from now on. Markets are driven by the disparity between expectations and reality - over the last six months expectations have been so low that reality did not have to be that strong for prices to move up.

But now that recovery has been deemed to have arrived, expectations have risen to a level at which they probably exceed reality. That dynamic was bad enough on its own, but the negative tone was surely reinforced when this senior industry figure then underlined that things are probably not going to get a lot better.

In the circumstances, then, the 2.1 per cent fall in the price of copper to US$6,454 a tonne and the 5.1 per cent fall in the price of nickel to US$18,500 a tonne, wasn’t too bad. Aluminium also declined by 2.4 per cent and ended the week at US$1,936, while lead dropped 4.8 per cent to US$2,320 a tonne. Zinc fared the best, and only fell by 1.6 per cent, to US$2,223 a tonne.

That said, it would be a brave man who put money on a sudden turnaround looking for higher prices. Deconstructing the US GDP figures showed that a large boost to the economy came from the car scrappage programme which will clearly not be sustainable for long.

More worrying for metals are the comments about the size of the stockpiles in China. If these are not drawn down by consumption then soon reduced levels of Chinese imports will impact Western inventory levels, and from there prices, in short order. Since China alone accounts for 20 per cent of the sales of the world’s largest mining company, its actions on stocking levels cannot be underestimated.

On a more positive note, some of the damage on metal prices was simply a function of a higher dollar. After being everyone’s favourite kicking stool for so long, the 1.4 per cent rise in the US currency would certainly have had some impact on the traditional dollar hedges like metals. The good news for miners, though, is that the currency move will help reduce costs in mines outside the US.

Rio Tinto was also updating its shareholders this week in its annual investor update. Having reduced its debt by 40 per cent this year through a rights issue and disposals it now feels able to double its capital expenditure programme for 2010 to US$5 billion.

While the short term outlook for metals might be a bit soft, the world’s second largest miner still sees plenty of opportunities in the longer term. If there is a market correction, it could provide an ideal opportunity for long term investors to pick up cheap stock from short term speculators looking to get out.
 
November 06, 2009

India Buys Up The First Tranche Of The IMF’s Proposed 403 Tonne Gold Sale – Who Will Buy The Second?

By Charles Wyatt
www.minesite.com/aus.html

It is hard to imagine that the news that the Reserve Bank of India has bought the first tranche of gold sold by the International Monetary Fund under a recently agreed deal with constituent members will hit the headlines in the Minnesota Mail or the South Carolina Chronicle, but it should have. It is yet another small sign that the leadership claimed by the US over the world’s economy since the late 1930s is diminishing. The geopolitical axis of the world is moving to the east and the US will be rewarded, as was Rome many centuries earlier, with its comeuppance for having too many enemies and a currency which is devaluing. There is always a new high flier wanting to take over. In the case of Rome it was the Huns, but that was many years before America was discovered by Columbus in 1492. In the case of America it is the countries of the Middle and Far East led by China and India.

In September it was agreed that a total of 403.3 tonnes of gold held by the IMF would be sold so that its finances could be shored up and it could continue its prime job of providing funds to needy countries. The IMF is very much an arm of the US. It is run from Washington and was originally formed with a stated objective of stabilizing international exchange rates and facilitating development. The US has the largest single vote in an organisation consisting of 186 countries, but the EU has crept up on it as its 27 member states now have double the votes of the US. China has less votes than the UK and India has half the votes of China. The IMF is a relic of the past when the US ruled the world, and, without these gold sales, it can no longer carry out its role.

The sale of this gold to India represents almost half of the total sales approved by the IMF. According to the World Gold Council (WGC), it is an important step in the IMF’s limited gold sales programme, which is designed to help put the Fund’s finances on a sound long-term footing. As Aram Shishmanian, chief executive of the WGC pointed out: “gold always plays an important role as a protector of wealth, and in these current times of financial instability, that role has taken on a newfound prominence. The fact that these sales will effectively rescue the IMF from a difficult situation regarding its own finances is proof of gold’s unique investment characteristics, long-recognised by central bankers and institutional and individual investors alike”.

This statement might be regarded as a shade disingenuous by those who remember Gordon Brown’s long drawn out sales of UK gold reserves which started in 1999 and by the rather smaller number of gold bugs who have tried to monitor a conspiracy between the US Treasury and leading banks to muzzle gold in its role as a warning light on economic and currency problems.

The IMF wants to sell this gold as quickly as possible rather than in dribs and drabs over an extended period of time via the separate Central Bank Gold Agreement, which was extended in August this year for another five years. Led by the European Central Bank, there were 18 countries which signed up to it this time around, but like the IMF itself, this agreement seems to be moving past its sell-by date. When introduced in 1999 it played a valuable role in controlling the gold market as central banks were queuing up to get out of gold after a bear market which had lasted for the best part of 20 years. As Matthew Keen, a director of Deutsche Bank, points out in an article in the London Bullion Market Association’s publication Alchemist, they got their timing badly wrong. “The irony is that the period between 1999 and 2005, which saw more official gold sector sales than at any other time in history, also marked the start of the bull run which is still going strong.”

If India can hand over US$6.7 billion in the blink of an eye to buy 200 tonnes of gold at an effective price of US$1,045 per ounce, the big question is whether any controls are now needed in the gold market. If India does not want the second tranche, China will grab it, as gold accounts for less than two per cent of its reserves, according to published information. And if China doesn’t it’ll be Japan, or Viet Nam (another kick up the backside for the US), or Russia or Saudi Arabia. China and Russia are gold producers and may buy their own production, but this does not lessen the case. The point is that gold does not lack for buyers and India’s purchase has reminded Europe’s central bankers that they might be best advised to hang on to their gold reserves.

Interestingly, India was not considered the most likely country to buy any IMF gold when the sale started. Another central bank was in the frame and John Meyer of stockbrokers Fairfax thinks it is still interested in buying the second slice. As a result he reported on Wednesday that London Bullion Market Association delegates had become bullish on the gold price, expecting it to be US$1,181 per ounce in 12 months time. Not too difficult to make that assumption in current conditions, and they are, after all, the experts. So let’s take a look back at what they were forecasting for gold at the beginning of the year. On the other hand, let’s not - it’s too painful, and John Reade of UBS would have to hang his head in shame for his pessimistic targets.

Let us end with a game of ‘just suppose’. Just suppose that the US, after the disaster imposed on its finances by greedy bankers, is tempted to release some of its gold reserves, reckoned by the WGC to total 8,134 tonnes. There is no way it could do that without actually confirming how many tonnes of gold are held in Fort Knox. For a long time now the Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee has been trying to get this information from the Fed, but to no avail. Lack of information inevitably leads to conspiracy theories and the popular one is that the US Treasury may have already sold this gold. How would it explain that, and what would such a revelation do for the price of gold? Answers on a postcard please.
 
November 07, 2009

That Was The Week That Was … In Australia

By Our Man in Oz
www.minesite.com/aus.html

Minews. Good morning Australia. It looks as if India’s 200 tonne gold purchase gave your market a kick along last week.

Oz. It certainly did. In fact India was the hot topic in sport as well, as there’s a fabulous one-day cricket series currently underway as we speak. The final two matches in a seven match series are being played this weekend in India, and last week we saw Australia snatch a three-to-two lead in a big scoring game. Sachin Tendulkar whacked a glorious 175 but even that was not quite enough with India falling three runs short of Australia’s daunting 350.

Minews. Exciting stuff, but perhaps we should stick to financial matters.

Oz. If you insist, though it is interesting to note the rise of India as a player in Australia’s present and future, after there’s been so much talk about the role of China. It’s been something of a curiosity down this way that India and Australia do not do more business, especially when you consider the common links that there are in sport, and the English heritage that runs through law, politics and business in both countries. And we both do our best to mangle the language, too.

Minews. Your point being that Australia has more than one Asian horse running in its economic future.

Oz. Precisely. And speaking of horses my tip for last week’s Melbourne Cup, Alcopop didn’t get up, but if you’d had a place flutter on Mourilyan you would have done well.

Minews. No more sport, thank you. Time for the market.

Oz. Gold is the obvious starting point, as the price hovers around the US$1,090 an ounce mark, and with US futures taking a peak above US$1,100 per ounce. One effect of the latest rise is that the Australian dollar has been dragged back up to around US92 cents, after sagging below US90 cents. On the stock market, the gold index was the star performer for the week, rising by 6.3 per cent, easily outperforming the overall metals index which added one per cent, and the all ordinaries, which slipped one per cent lower.

There were no outstanding stock movements, as the currency effect eroded much of the US dollar gain, though it is worth pointing out that six of the top 10 stocks to rise on the ASX last week were gold miners. Among the better upward moves, Kingsgate (KCN) reclaimed most of its recently lost ground with a powerful rise of A93 cents to A$8.53, while Troy (TRY) benefited from the gold price and from an outbreak of peace in the boardroom, and rose A26 cents to A$2.58. Meanwhile, Resolute (RSG) regained lost support, putting in a rise of A10 cents to A80.5 cents. And also better off, Avoca (AVO) added 28 cents to A$1.73, Medusa (MML) rose A33 cents higher to A$3.63, while Apex (AXM) finally started to develop some traction after a tough 12 months, rising by A1 cent to A5.2 cents, which doesn’t sound much but on a percentage basis is a solid upward move.

Other stocks to rise included Perseus (PRU), up A8 cents to A$1.55, and Sino Gold (SGX), up 65 cents to A$7.30. Saracen (SAR) was also stronger, after it reported good gold grades at its Carosue prospect. That helped lift the stock by A4 cents to A33.5 cents. Chalice (CHN) issued a bullish report on its Koka project in Eritrea, but that translated only into a modest rise of A1.5 cents to A48.5 cents. Silver Lake (SLR) reclaimed lost ground with a rise of A7.5 cents to A92.5 cents, and Integra (IGR) reported more good gold hits at its Salt Creek project, rising by A2.5 cents to A27.5 cents.

Somewhat perversely in a week when gold was in the headlines around the world we also saw a number of stocks stall, or even fall. Adamus (ADU) slipped half a cent lower to A41.5 cents, Allied (ALD) lost A1.5 cents to A44 cents, and CGA (CGX) fell by A3 cents to A$1.64.

Minews. Across to iron ore now, where there seems to have been plenty of action.

Oz. There was, but not all of it was positive. Star of the week was Iron Ore Holdings (IOH) which we reported on in detail a few weeks ago. It added an impressive A18 cents over the week to close at A$1.25, although it did touch a 12 month high of A$1.30 during Friday trade. Centrex (CXM), a stock we hear little about, became the latest iron ore player to stitch up a Chinese connection, and as a result added A10 cents to its price to close at A72 cents. Ironclad (IFE), another low-key iron ore stock, gained A4 cents to A40 cents, while BC Iron (BCI) rose by A9 cents to A$1.17. After that there was a long list of losers, led by Gindalbie (GBG) which perhaps ought to have done better after it won final government approvals for its big Karara project, cementing in the process its ties to the Chinese steel maker, Ansteel. On the market, Gindalbie lost A3 cents to A85.5 cents. Other downward movers included Northern Iron (NFE) which slipped A10 cents lower to A$1.70, Giralia (GIR), which lost A7 cents to A94 cents, Atlas (AGO), which eased back by A5 cents to A$1.75, and Brockman (BRM), which was A6 cents lighter at A$1.95.

Minews. Base metals now, please.

Oz. The picture was mixed, with limited movement either way, apart from a few good moves in the copper sector. Highlands (HIG), which has done a good job of disappearing from view over the past couple of years, came back strongly with news of a monster copper and gold drill hit which included a 968 metre section of core assaying 0.5% copper and 0.4 grams a tonne of gold, classic Papua New Guinea stuff. On the market, news of that intersection boosted the stock by A9.5 cents to a closing price of A37 cents, just short of the 12 month high hit on Friday of A38 cents. Adelaide Resources (ADN) was the other copper newsmaker, as it reported good results from its Rover project in the Northern Territory. That was enough to boost the stock by A4 cents to A25.5 per cents.

After those two items of excitement the moves were modest either way. Sandfire (SFR), the hottest of the local explorers, regained some recently lost ground with a rise of A7 cents to A$3.72. Talisman (TLM), its near neighbour, added A5 cents to A96 cents. Syndicated (SMD) was up A1 cent to A23 cents, and Exco (EXS) added A2 cents to A26 cents. Going down CuDeco (CDO) eased back by A21 cents to A$5.51, and Marengo (MGO) dropped A2.5 cents to A17 cents.

Nickel stocks were slightly firmer. Western Areas (WSA) added A2 cents to A$4.87, Mirabela (MBN) rose by A23 cents to A$2.98, and Independence was up by A1 cent to A$4.32. Mincor eased back by A12 cents to A$2.07 and Minara (MRE) was A5 cents weaker at A84 cents, after being named as the favourite to buy BHP Billiton’s mothballed Ravensthorpe mine. Zinc stocks were flat.

Minews. Uranium, coal, and any specials to finish, please.

Oz. It was all much the same as it was in the base metals sector - some up, some down. Mantra (MRU) was the best of the uranium stocks, putting in a rise of A30 cents to A$4.75, while Extract (EXT) clawed back lost ground with a rise of A22 cents to A$8.54. After that it was downhill. Paladin (PDN) lost A5 cents to A$4.11. Uranex (UNX) was A3 cents lighter at A30 cents. Manhattan (MHC) slipped A2 cents lower to A93 cents. And coal stocks were equally uninspiring. Coal of Africa (CZA) was one of the better performers with a rise of A9 cents to A$1.95, but Riversdale (RIV) lost A10 cents to A$5.40.

In specials, the lithium hopeful Galaxy (GXY) added A15 cents to A$1.63 after an on-site ceremony to mark the start of construction. Manganese leader, OM Holdings (OMH), remains under takeover watch, and that generated sufficient interest to boost its shares by A14 cents to A$1.89. Moly Mines completed a fresh capital raising, but the extra shares being issued dragged the price down by A6.5 cents to A85 cents, which is nonetheless still above the A75 cents being paid by Canadian investors in the Australian molybdenum hopeful.

Minews. Thanks Oz.
 
November 09, 2009

Gold Hits $1,100 As The Anglo-Saxon Economies Show Signs Of Becoming Addicted To Stimulus

By Rob Davies
www.minesite.com/aus.html

Without doubt the most important news last week for anyone interested in commodities was the announcement that India bought 200 tonnes of gold from the IMF. It might only represent US$6.7 billion out of the country’s US$277 billion of reserves, but its significance is greater than that. In combination with buying interest from other central banks, this move indicates that central banks this year will become net buyers of gold for the first time since 1998.

Not all central banks are equal of course, but it is instructive to note that some of them are moving nominal assets like dollars into hard assets like gold, while others are doing the opposite. The Bank of England is creating more nominal assets through quantitative easing and the US Federal Reserve is doing something similar with its ultra low interest rate policy.

Another rise in US unemployment to 10.2 per cent, the highest unemployment rate seen for 26 years, was all the markets needed to be confirm their view that US rates will stay low for as long as necessary, for an “extended period” in the official jargon.

The reaction to both news items was to push gold up to new high of US$1,109 an ounce, and to widen the spread between 10 year and two year US Treasuries to 264bps. Investors have decided that the authorities in the UK and US are simply going to print enough money to inflate their way out of this crisis.

This view accords with that of Bill Gross who runs PIMCO, the world’s biggest bond fund manager. He believes that lax monetary policy over the last decade or so in conjunction with the growth in the shadow banking system and aggressive (or even irresponsible) lending by the traditional banks has inflated asset prices across the board.

Some observers might think that the solution to this would be for asset prices to fall. But no, Gross argues that the only solution is for governments to continue pumping money into the developed economies in order to maintain asset prices at current levels. Like an addict, the only solution is more and more stimulus.

That means anyone looking to buy cheap houses, cheap shares or cheap metals is going to be disappointed. After all, both the UK and the US governments have got vast shareholdings in banks that need to be refinanced and eventually sold off. It’s not just a case of the authorities changing roles from poacher to gamekeeper. They are playing both roles at the same time.

In such an environment it is therefore no surprise to see gold rise and base metals follow in its footsteps. Over the past week, a 1.3 per cent fall in the dollar was mirrored by a 1.1 per cent rise in copper to US$6,526 a tonne, although the other metals were weaker. Aluminium fell 2.6 per cent to US$1,885, and nickel dropped 3.8 per cent to US$17,805. Lead fell 0.2 per cent to US$2,415 per tonne, while zinc fell 1.7 per cent to US$2,,185 a tonne.

The sheer scale of the liquidity being pumped into capital markets by the Anglo Saxon central banks will be enough to overwhelm any doubt about the bearish outlook for the short term. In the medium term, the authorities will be sincerely hoping that normal economic growth will be resumed and that this will allow the stimulus to be gradually reduced.

If that doesn’t work then the Indian central bank might be getting visitors from London and Washington asking for instructions on Plan B.
 
The price of gold: an opinion from India
Nov 10 2009
Source: Livemint.com

Rock, scissors, paper, gold

We don’t share some of the grand beliefs of the gold bugs. But if central banks continue to print money, we won’t be surprised if gold prices continue to rise beyond this week’s record.
About a week after the Reserve Bank of India spent $6.7 billion to buy 200 tonnes of gold from the International Monetary Fund, prices of the yellow metal have hit a record in nominal terms, crossing $1,100 an ounce even though they are still below their 1980 peaks in inflation-adjusted terms. To cross the latter, gold will have to move beyond $1,885 an ounce.
It is interesting to see who has been buying to push up prices. The New York Times last week cited data from the World Gold Council to report that consumption of gold for jewellery dropped 20% in the second quarter of 2009 while investor demand increased 51%.
Gold bugs may be hoping for a return to the earlier era when gold was the currency of trade and exchange. But they are daydreaming. There is enough economic research to show that the inflexibilities of the gold standard made the Great Depression worse. Thus, nations that could not adjust their currencies were forced into protectionism, a move that made the 1930s crisis even worse.
An economy in a crisis needs extra liquidity and the supply of gold is fixed: No chances of quantitative easing there.
However, the current rally in gold prices does have quite a bit to do with the quantitative easing that many Western central banks have done to stave off a financial collapse. More paper money and the same amount of gold are bound to change the relative prices of these two assets. That is what is happening: A drop in the dollar is mirrored by the rise in gold prices.
The future direction of gold will depend on whether inflation rears its head and whether the dollar continues to decline.
Investor Jim Rogers bases his forecast that gold prices will double to $2,000 an ounce on these two assumptions. Economists such as Nouriel Roubini””who shot to fame earlier this decade when he became one of the first to warn about a coming financial collapse””rubbish Rogers’ price forecast. They expect deflation rather than inflation.
We do not share some of the more grand beliefs of the gold bugs. But if central banks continue to print money, we would not be surprised if gold prices continue to rise.
 
November 14, 2009

That Was The Week That Was … In Australia

By Our Man in Oz
www.minesite.com/aus.html

Minews. Good morning Australia. How was your week?

Oz. The market finished up, but not dramatically so. Rises outnumbered falls by a comfortable margin, and all of the major indices moved ahead a few percentage points. Gold, perhaps because of the high Australian dollar against the US dollar, was the disappointment of the week. Despite scaling the US$1,100 an ounce barrier, and looking set for a period of continued strength, the gold index was the week’s laggard, adding 2.1 per cent compared with the 2.5 per cent put on by the all ordinaries and the four per cent rise enjoyed by the metals and mining index. As we speak, the Aussie dollar is back over US93 cents, a gain of about US1 cent over the week, which is not a lot in itself. But it is the trend which worries gold bugs.

Another gold worry is that the national business newspaper, the Australian Financial Review suddenly became a gold convert. Its Saturday morning cover told investors that they “shouldn’t laugh about gold hitting US$2,000 an ounce”. As a rule of thumb down this way whenever the AFR starts talking about resources, investors know it’s time to get out.

Minews. If gold wasn’t the strong performer, which sector was?

Oz. Iron ore produced more winners than any of the other sectors, with a few stand-out performers. Golden West (GWR) was the star, after months in the doldrums during which Minesite rabbited on about the hidden value in the stock to no avail. As recently as September 3rd we carried a report on the stock being overdue for a revival, if only to catch up to its peers. Back then, Golden West was trading at A35 cents. On Friday it shot up to A52.5 cents, for a gain of A18 cents and the title of the ASX’s top stock of the week. Driving Golden West was a report of fresh high-grade drill results from the company’s Joyner’s Find deposit near the outback town of Wiluna. These included nine metres at a near-perfect 69% iron.

Minews. Since you’ve started on iron ore you might as well keep going, and then hop across to gold.

Oz. Good decision, because there is chatter in the market that China is marshalling its forces to hit back at the curious recent alliance between BHP Billiton and Rio Tinto. Just how that hitting back will unfold remains to be seen but the speculation is that the game will start with China funding a fourth railway system and port to link together a number of “orphaned” or isolated ore bodies which have been struggling to gain access to the BHP Billiton and Rio Tinto rail and port systems. In other words, if China can’t buy a big iron ore producer, following its failure with Rio Tinto, then it will assemble its own source of supply, which will but the big boys under considerable pressure.

The takeover of United Minerals (UMC) by BHP Billiton offers a clue as to how seriously the two leading local miners are treating the threat. Until BHP Billiton moved, UMC was close to doing a deal with a Chinese steel mill. Events at Iron Ore Holdings (IOH) look like repeating that pattern, as IOH is said to be close to revealing a fresh resource upgrade, and is possibly talking to three joint venture partners, or a bidder. On the market, IOH added A5 cents last week to close at A$1.30, but did trade up to a 12 month high of A$1.38 on Monday.

Other iron ore moves last week included Gindalbie (GBG), which recovered from a period of heavy selling to close A10 cents higher at A95 cents. Mt Gibson (MGX) was also in strong recovery mode, rising by A13 cents to A$1.42. Elsewhere, Giralia (GIR) added A9 cents to A$1.06, and Atlas (AGO) rose A6 cents to A$1.81. Meanwhile, Fortescue (FMG) excited the investment banks with talk of an additional debt and capital raising designed to enable the company to expand output to a stratospheric 155 million tonnes a year, and more. That was enough to push the stock up by A20 cents to A$4.04. A handful of iron ore stocks went against the trend. FerrAus (FRA) dropped A3 cents to A73 cents, while BC Iron (BCI), which we took a look at last week, slipped A2.5 cents lower to A$1.15.

Minews. Over to gold now, because it remains the talk of the financial world, even if your investors are a bit skittish.

Oz. Overall, in the wake of the US dollar strength in gold, rises did outnumber falls, but there was a surprising number of stocks in decline too. Before we get to the bad news the good news was that some companies staged pretty impressive rallies. Resolute (RSG) finally seems to be winning points for solving the metallurgical mystery which has been holding back the Syama mine in Mali. Investors pushed the stock back through the A$1 mark for the first time in more than a year. At the close on Friday, Resolute was up A16.5 cents at A96 cents, but it did hit a 12 month high of A$1.04 on Thursday.

The other stock in the precious metals category to outperform last week was one that we hear very little about, Cobar Consolidated (CCU), a company working up a silver mine in western New South Wales. It has reported robust economics at its Wonawinta project, and rose by A13.5 cents in heavy turnover last week to close at A38 cents, down a little on the 12 month high of A42.5 cents reach early on Friday - at which point the company copped a speeding fine from the ASX.

Elsewhere among the gold stocks OceanaGold (OGC) added A13.5 cents to A$1.41, Regis (RRL) rose by A5.5 cents to A57.5 cents, Adamus (ADU) added A2.5 cents to A44 cents, Kingsgate (KCN) put on A86 cents to A$9.39, Chalice (CHN) rose by A1.5 cents to A50 cents, and Carrick (CRK) put in a star turn with a rise of A13.5 cents to A89.5 cents. Two new stocks that did well last week were Chesser Resources (CHZ), which has an interesting gold project in Turkey, and Matsa Resources (MAT), which is exploring in Western Australia and close to Kingsgate’s Chatree mine in Thailand. Chesser added A2 cents to A19.5 cents, and Matsa rose by A5 cents to A30 cents. Going down, St Barbara (SBM) raised more capital and dropped A2.5 cents to A31.5 cents, while Troy (TRY) retreated after a period of solid recovery, shedding A9 cents to A$2.49. Also weaker, Excalibur (EXM) slipped A1 cent lower to A17 cents.

Minews. Base metals next please.

Oz. This should be short and sweet. Most copper stocks barely moved. The three exceptions were OZ Minerals (OZL), which reclaimed recently lost ground with a rise of A7 cents to A$1.24, Anvil (AVM), which added A10 cents to A$3.31, and Sandfire (SFR), which received a boost from management presentations in Europe, including a well-received session at last week’s Minesite forum in London. Sandfire added A36 cents to close at A$4.08 despite (or perhaps because of) the ASX querying one of the slides in its presentation. This showed a future possible mine development, and the really stupid part about the ASX query is that the allegedly offending slide remains on the ASX’s own website. Curious readers can see the original unadulterated slide on page 15 of the document here.

Nickel stocks were flat, apart from Western Areas (WSA), which added A20 cents to A$5.07, and Mirabela (MBN), which rose A32 cents to A$4.64. Zinc stocks did nothing, with Terramin (TZN) down A1 cent to A79 cents and Perilya (PEM) up A3 cents to A50 cents.

Minews. Uranium and specials to finish please.

Oz. Manhattan (MHC) was the uranium star of the week, up A27 cents to A$1.20 with nothing fresh reported. The company’s chairman, Alan Eggers, has a strong following. Most other moves were mildly weaker. Mantra (MRU) lost A13 cents to A$4.68. Uranex (UNX) was down A1 cent to A29 cents, while Extract (EXT) lost A23 cents to A$8.31. Companies with exposure to the other energy mineral, coal, were somewhat stronger, with Macarthur (MCC) rising by an eye-catching A82 cents to A$9.63, and Riversdale adding A18 cents to A$5.58.

A few specials are worth mentioning. Bauxite Resources (BAU) announced the sailing of its first shipment of ore to China, a step which boosted the stock by A8 cents to A$1.07. Black Fire (BFE) became the latest lithium player on the ASX, as it purchased a project in Namibia - a move which lifted the stock by A4 cents to A16.5 cents. And NiPlats (NIP), which has a vanadium prospect on its books, added A10 cents to A66 cents after the acquisitive Cape Lambert Iron lifted its stake in the stock to 37.6 per cent in the latest in a rash of deals put together by the cashed up iron ore company which has emerged as the owner of the assets of the failed CopperCo.

Minews. Thanks Oz.
 
November 16, 2009

Once The Recovery Gets Fully Underway, The Battle Between Bond Investors And Commodity Investors Will Turn Serious

By Rob Davies
www.minesite.com/aus.html

The investment industry has even more clichés and aphorisms than the world of sport. Despite that, new ones still crop up that seem exactly to hit the spot. This one for example: “Investments always move in the direction that will disappoint the maximum number of people”. The reason this looks relevant is the recent record cash inflow into commodity funds.
According to the Financial Times, Clive Capital, the world’s largest commodity hedge fund, has just stopped accepting new money. Currently, Barclays Capital estimates that the amount invested in commodity assets stands at US$224 billion. That is not far off the record US$270 billion achieved in 2008 when oil peaked at US$147 a barrel. Now, though, the money is going into ETFs that are backed by metals, especially precious metals, encouraged by the record highs in gold.

It is an unfortunate fact that the more hot money flows into an asset class when it’s at its peak rather than its trough. But no-one can know when the peak is until some time later when the second half of the price graph can be drawn. Until then everyone is in the dark.

The bull case for commodities is based on the idea that rising industrial demand is tugging against limited production capacity after years of underinvestment in new mines and plant. That argument remains a potent one. However, abnormally low interest rates in almost all countries, except those that produce metals, have created vast amounts of capital seeking a better return. It is some of this promiscuous capital that has piled into commodities in anticipation of the market getting tighter in the next year or so, and its this that has been driving prices even higher.

It may well be, though, that the actions of these investors have brought forward the next peak and that the good news is already in the price. Maybe, the peak might be this year, not next. As ever, currency moves complicate the picture but copper dropped 0.9 per cent over the week to US$6,470 a tonne, and nickel has continued its recent decline with a fall of 8.3 per cent to US$16,325 a tonne. Aluminium was unique, putting in a gain of 1.7 per cent to close out last week at US$1,917, even as lead and zinc dropped 2.8 per cent and 2.5 per cent respectively to US$2,250 and US$2,130 a tonne.

What is odd about the financial markets at the moment is that commodities are flying at the same time that bond markets have reached a 28 year high. As a comparison more money, US$280 billion, has gone into bond funds this year alone than the total amount invested in commodities. It is true that bonds offer an income while commodities don’t. Even so, 3.4 per cent for ten year US Treasuries is hardly enticing.

In a way commodities can be said to have a negative income, but investors expect the capital gain on the underlying asset to offset the lost income by some margin. Equally, the risk with bonds is that the potential capital losses will dwarf any income. That applies especially to the Japanese bond market where yields are only 1.48 per cent for ten year JGBs.

While investors might worry about rising supply of UK and US debt, the real concern is the potential flood from Japan. Even after the recent fiscal incontinence of the two leading Anglo Saxon economies, debt to GDP ratios in both is around 90 per cent. In Japan it is 200 per cent. That is tolerable when interest rates are low. But a 21 per cent rise in the Baltic Dry Index over one week suggests that economic recovery is now well entrenched and that higher interest rates, and/or inflation, cannot be far away.

When that happens, the battle between bond investors and commodity investors will turn serious. That will pit a 28 year bull market for bonds against a seven year bull market for commodities. The outcome will be interesting to watch, to say the least.
 
November 17, 2009

Why Does The Financial Times Have A Fear Of Gold?

By Charles Wyatt
www.minesite.com/aus.html

What fun we are having with gold nowadays. Every time it goes up a few dollars an ounce the tired old Financial Times comes in and gives it a swipe. Minews suggested to Martin Wolf, the chief economics editor, that it was almost as if the newspaper was frightened of gold, but he replied, “Not really, no. I regard the news that Asians are buying more gold, as they become richer, and accumulate more reserves as very much a case of "dog bites man". It would be interesting if it were not the case”. What anyone can make out of this anodyne reply is up to them, but fear of gold is a disease that has also hit the Australian Financial Review, as our Man in Oz pointed out in this week’s review of events Down Under – That Was The Week That Was … In Australia.

He wrote, “Gold, perhaps because of the high Australian dollar against the US dollar, was the disappointment of the week. Despite scaling the US$1,100 an ounce barrier, and looking set for a period of continued strength, the gold index was the laggard of the week, adding 2.1 per cent compared with the 2.5 per cent put on by the all ordinaries and the four per cent per cent put on by the metals and mining index. As we speak, the Aussie dollar is back over US93 cents, a gain of about US1 cent over the week, which is not a lot. But it is the trend which worries gold bugs. Another gold worry is that the national business newspaper, the Australian Financial Review, suddenly became a gold convert with its Saturday morning cover telling investors that they ‘shouldn’t laugh about gold hitting US$2,000 ounce’. As a rule of thumb down this way”, continues our Man in Oz, “whenever the AFR starts talking about resources, investors know it’s time to get out which, this time, might not be correct but it does have an anti-gold reputation topped only by your Financial Times”.

What is it about gold that upsets these otherwise respected journals? The answer seems to be that their leader columns are written by economists who do not understand the basic principles of investment, having never traded stocks nor commodities in their lives, and who have consequently been embarrassed by gold time after time. Just two examples: in August 2004 the F.T. published a piece sub-headed, “The pointlessness of holding bullion continues to sink in”. At the time the price of gold was just over US$400 an ounce, two years after Gordon Brown had sold a large chunk of the UK’s gold reserves at an average price of US$275 per ounce. Exactly three years later, the Pinker than Pink ’Un came out with a piece entitled ‘Stolid Gold’ in its Lex column. It does not need a brain surgeon to know what that was about, and the timing was classic as the gold price then rose in what was very close to straight line from US$680 per ounce to just on US$1,000 early in 2008.

Minews then embarked on an e-mail conversation with the writer of the last article to try to persuade him that gold was a useful part of any sensible investor’s armoury. It gives early warning, which politicians and economists do not want to hear, of when something is going adrift in terms of currency or inflation. The FT writer was having none of that, though, and Minews was dismissed as a gold nut, and shortly afterwards he was promoted to be Head of Lex in the US. Tells you all you want to know really as the current editor of the newspaper was previously the F.T.’s US managing director, and he clearly hates the one thing that emphasises the weakness of the once mighty dollar.

To be fair, he did run a leader early in May of this year entitled “Fear has Made The Yellow Metal Desirable Once Again.” The financial clouds were still pretty dark at the time and metals, both precious and base, were one of the few sectors that were advancing. Since then, however, he has changed his mind again, and his minions were at it again in the leader column on Saturday 7th November, when a piece entitled ‘Bullion Quest Is No Golden Opportunity’ appeared, with the sub-heading ‘Gold Purchases Do Not Address Macroeconomic Challenges’. The argument seems to be that the shrewd nations of Asia who have built up huge reserves of currencies which they are using, in small part, to buy gold are behaving selfishly. According to the FT “real action means tough choices: saving less and greatly expanding swap agreements.” Well, bless my old boots, as my grandfather used to say. Who came through the recent economic shambles in better shape, countries in the West, or those in the East?

Returning to the subject of gold, on Friday 13th, a very suitable day, the Lex column carried a piece headed ‘Peak Gold?’ The first sentence captured the whole argument as it went “Rare, malleable and immune to corrosion, gold made an ideal source of money before the development of modern currency”. So it did, and one of the prime reasons why investors are buying gold now is that it still demonstrates the fallibilities of paper money. Read a little further and the teenage scribbler reveals beyond doubt that he, or she, does not understand that the basic aim of investment is to make money. On the subject of demand for gold the writer says, “It is not really demand in the same sense as other finite commodities because gold is almost always just being held in order that it might later be sold, to a greater fool, at a profit”.

So, all-knowing Lex, who was the greater fool? The investor who took your advice and sold gold in August 2004, or he who bought it off him? Anyone with anything between their ears would know which he would prefer to be, but the word fool grates a little, even in the context of the “greater fool theory”. In the days of that great editor of the F.T., Sir Gordon Newton, young journalists were taught the value of presenting both sides of the argument. Nobody wins by suggesting that the opposition are fools. There is always the danger that it could be the other way round. As a result of its stubborn stance the F.T. has been knocking gold throughout the eight years of a bull market during which it has risen from US$275 an ounce to US$1,132 an ounce. How sensible is that?
 
Gold to Outperform U.S. Stocks on Stimulus, Marc Faber Says
By Joyce Koh
Source: http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aSoEpFEjNz3o&pos=5#

Nov. 18 (Bloomberg) -- Gold, which climbed to a record today, will outperform U.S. stocks as investors turn to the bullion on further government stimulus spending, said Marc Faber, publisher of the Gloom, Boom & Doom report.

The support level for the commodity will now be at $1,000, which was the precious metal’s resistance level previously, Faber said in a Bloomberg Television interview in Singapore today. Immediate-delivery bullion gained as much as $7.10, or 0.6 percent, to $1,148.40 an ounce in London and was at $1,148.20 by 11:25 a.m. local time.

“What will continue to happen is that the S&P 500 and the Dow Jones will go down relative to gold,” Faber said. “I think gold will go up more” from its support level.

The outlook for gold sparked a debate between economist Nouriel Roubini and Jim Rogers earlier this month. Rogers, the investor who predicted the start of the commodities rally in 1999, said Roubini is wrong about the threat of bubbles in gold and emerging-market stocks. Roubini, who predicted the global economic crisis, said a forecast by the investor that gold will double to at least $2,000 an ounce is “utter nonsense.”

“Will it go $2,000, $200,000 or $2 trillion? I don’t know,” Faber said. “But if you have money printing in the world, then the price will over time rise. It will go up more for things that you just can’t increase the supply, and the supply of precious metals is very limited.”

‘Good Asset’

Gold is set for a ninth annual gain as central banks, pension funds and individual buyers seek to protect themselves from potential currency debasement and inflation. Policy makers worldwide have set interest rates near zero and spent $2 trillion to pull the world economy out of the worst recession since World War II.

“With the crisis, people are realizing gold is a good asset to have,” Pierre Gay, chief executive officer at Newedge Financial Asia-Pacific, said in a Bloomberg Television interview today. “For me, the potential for gold is pretty high.”

Faber expects the U.S. government to increase its stimulus spending should the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index fall toward 900. The U.S. budget deficit under President Barack Obama’s administration reached a record $1.4 trillion in the fiscal year that ended Sept. 30. Debt amounted to 9.9 percent of the nation’s economy, triple the size of the 2008 shortfall.

“I don’t think the S&P will drop below 800 or 900, and eventually will go higher in nominal terms, but not necessary in real terms,” he said, predicting a correction in the measure in the “near term.”

The index rose 0.1 percent to 1,110.32 yesterday. The investor predicted on March 9 in a Bloomberg interview that equities would rally because of government stimulus measures. The S&P 500 Index dropped to a 12-year low that day and has since climbed 64 percent as a four-quarter contraction in the world’s largest economy ended, while the MSCI World Index rallied 71 percent.
 
November 19, 2009

Australia Powers On, For The Time Being At Least

By Alastair Ford
www.minesite.com/aus.html

For a quick indication of the best that Australia’s had to offer in recent weeks, a retrospective look at the share price performances of three companies we’ve had occasion to mention more than a few times on Minesite lately seems appropriate. During the month of October, shares in Focus Minerals rose by 47.5 per cent, shares in United Minerals Corporation (UMC) by 42.1 per cent, and shares in Centamin Egypt by 37.6 per cent. The slight caveat to the impression of a bumper month here given is that during October it was already widely known that Centamin’s ASX-listing was not long for this world. Possibly Aussies were buying while it was easy to do so. Or possibly the price rise was driven by market activity in the UK and Canada, where the company also has listings.

Still, in shares in companies based in Western Australia at least, which account for a clear majority of the Australian resources stocks, were marginally up in October, according to analysis done by Deloitte WA, as compared to the global indices which were broadly down. The Australian outperformance continues apace, it seems, powered on by iron ore and gold, and with only some of the shine being taken off by the strong Australian dollar. As Mark Reilly, the chief of Australian-based but African-focussed Forte Energy commented recently, “there’s only one currency around at the moment”. Still, it’s alright for him, his costs are denominated in the ailing US currency.

Still, the strong Aussie dollar’s not discouraging spending at home either, it seems, even if it is putting extra costs onto the profit and loss accounts of those that are already mining. According to the latest data from the Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics the value of Australia’s mining and energy projects currently under development hit a record A$113 billion in October. To be sure, much of that number is accounted for by the A$43 billion valuation of the giant Gorgan Liquified Natural Gas project in north-western Australia. Western Australia, however, accounts for 83 per cent of the capital expenditure on what the Bureau calls “advanced” projects.

Two out of the three risers that we mentioned at the beginning of this piece fall into that category, as Focus is developing its project at Coolgardie in the Western Australian Goldfields, while UMC is working up iron ore properties in the Pilbara in the north of Western Australia. Focus has recently raised new money and looks on track to be in production at a rate of 100,000 ounces of gold per year by 2011 following refurbishment work at its Three Mile Hill mill. In the case of UMC you don’t have to look far to find the cause of October’s share price strength – the A$1.30 per share bid that came in from BHP Billiton. The back story to that bid is nonetheless interesting, though, as it’s fairly clear that BHP Billiton waded in late onto the scene to cut out a potential Chinese intervention in a territory that it still regards as its own back yard, a back yard in which Rio Tinto is the only other company allowed to play.

There’s only so much gazumping of Chinese companies that BHP Billiton and Rio can do, that the Australian government can countenance, or that the Chinese will put up with. Waiting in the wings are a plethora of smaller companies, and one or two bigger ones too – Fortesque, Atlas Iron, BC Iron, Brockman Iron, Iron Ore Holdings, FerrAus, Giralia, and Aquila, to name but a few, and as the global economic recovery begins to take hold, demand for iron ore will only increase.

That’s the theory, at any rate, and it bodes well for the miners of Western Australia. But, as the Chinese Iron and Steel Association (CISA) releases data that shows steel production continuing to outpace demand, some analysts are beginning to note the caution with which BHP Billiton’s boss, Marius Kloppers, spoke at a recent results presentation. He spoke in the context of what ended up being, to the surprise of many, a bumper year. Chinese restocking across a range of metals in 2009 went far beyond the expectations of most industry watchers. Indeed it might be fair to say, looking back at the state the world was in at the beginning of January 2009, that the Chinese demand for metal this year has been beyond the wildest dreams of many miners who might at that stage have thought they were a gonner. Some, of course, were – RIP CopperCo, amongst others.

But most made it through on the strength of high levels of Chinese buying which brought the metals powering back. Much of that metal is still sitting around in warehouses, beggin the question – will the upward momentum continue in 2010? Mr Kloppers cautions that it might not, but market sentiment, for the time being, at least, says otherwise. Still, whichever way that plays out, the outlook for gold remains pretty solid. Inflation fears should keep the US gold price pretty high, while any drop off in demand for industrial metals will have a corresponding effect on the Aussie dollar, which will also be good for the Aussie golds. Focus Minerals, anyone? Catalpa? Norseman? There are hundreds to choose from, and here on Minesite we’ll continue to try to bring you the pick of the bunch.
 
November 21, 2009

That Was The Week That Was … In Australia

By Our Man in Oz
www.minesite.com/aus.html

Minews. Good morning Australia. Your market seems to have benefited more from currency than from metal-price movements last week.

Oz. Currency remains the big story down this way - and perhaps around the world - as the US dollar tries to find a fresh floor. For Australian mineral exporters, who get paid for almost everything in US dollars, the recovery in metal prices over the past 10 months has been severely impaired by twin effects of the US dollar falling and the Australian dollar rising. But last week, for the first time, we saw what can happen when currency moves are favourable, and gold stocks lead the way up. The gold index on the ASX rose by 4.3 per cent, comfortably ahead of the movement in the US dollar gold price, thanks to the Australian dollar sliding US2 cents lower, from US93.5 cents to US91.5 cents. The impact of the lower dollar was also felt in the broader mining market, with the metals index up 2.7 per cent - a strong performance when measured against the all ordinaries, which fell by about half-a-per-cent.

Minews. Let’s start this week’s wrap up with the strongest sector, gold.

Oz. Okay, but before we get there it’s worth making a few comments about the big picture, to set the scene for London-based readers, and this includes a warning about signs of a little “irrational exuberance” sneaking into the Australian market. The best place to see irrationality is in the new floats game, which has returned with even greater gusto than we reported just three weeks ago. Back on November 3rd Minesite carried a story from Oz on the eight mining floats making their way through the ASX listing process. On Friday, that list had exploded to 18.

It’s not the right place to do a completely fresh call of the card, but over the past 20 days companies which tossed their names into the ring have included Ausgold, Ishine International Resources, Kimberley Metals, MetroCoal, General Mining, NT Resources, Raisama, Rubianna, Stanmore Coal, and a gas company called Apollo Gas. However, topping it all off is a plan from Queensland iron ore and coal billionaire Clive Palmer which aims to raise A$3.2 billion floating off some of his assets via a company called Resourcehouse. Palmer’s plans include using Hong Kong as the primary exchange, another pointer to the growing ties between Australia, the mine, and China, the factory.

Minews. Your point being that there seem to be too many floats too quickly?

Oz. That’s the fear. Australia has come through the global downturn in pretty good shape, as you have noted in a couple of stories, which is in itself a worry, because whenever you Brits say something nice about Oz we know something bad must be lurking in the background. Banter aside, it seems that the rush of resource floats will test the local capital market and it’s a fair bet that quite a few of the hopefuls with their names before the ASX will not deliver a fast, or a even slow, profit.

Minews. Warning noted. Now for prices, please.

Oz. Just about every gold stock on the board posted a reasonable rise last week. Pick of the pack was Medusa (MML) which is having a bumper year at its Philippines projects, and confirmed last week that it would soon start trading on the Toronto market. That news helped lift the stock to a 12 month high of A$4.40 on Thursday, which was then followed by a modest slide for the company to close on Friday at A$4.27 for a gain over the week of A33 cents. Andean (AND), Carrick (CRK) and Chalice (CHN) also hit fresh 12 month share price highs during the week. Andean traded up to A$2.58 on Friday, before closing at A$2.54 for a gain of 14 cents over the week. Carrick cracked the A$1.00 mark on Friday, for a gain of A10 cents. Chalice added A7.5 cents to end the week at A57.5 cents, after hitting a fresh high of A59 cents.

Amongst other notable gold movers Perseus (PRU) announced a suite of excellent gold grades from its Tengrela project in Ivory Coast, rising A9 cents to A$1.69. Also up, Kingsgate (KCN) added A27 cents to end the week at A$9.66, down slightly on a 12 month high reached on Wednesday of A$9.89. Meanwhile, Resolute (RSG) continued to charge back strongly after a year of difficult trading when the Syama gold mine was being brought up to full production. Last week, Resolute also claimed a fresh 12 month high of A$1.13, before easing to close at A$1.06, up A10 cents. Also better off, Troy (TRY) added A9 cents to A$2.58, Silver Lake (SLR) rose A10 cents to A$1.04, Catalpa (CAH) added A1 cent to A15.5 cents, and St Barbara (SBM) added A3 cents to A34.5 cents.

Minews. Iron Ore next, please.

Oz. Also a strong sector, although not as strong as gold. Most share price moves were up, but with a few sliders. Australasian Resources (ARH), which started life with an asset acquired from Clive Palmer a few years ago, announced an environmental all-clear on its Balmoral South project, a move which saw the stock add A6 cents to A50.5 cents. Ironclad (IFE), one of the emerging South Australian iron ore miners, announced a port-access deal, a critical step in getting product from its Wilcherry Hills project to market. That news boosted the stock by an eye-catching A23 cents to A66.5 cents. Aquila (AQA) confirmed its share issue to China’s Baosteel, rising by A98 cents to A$9.10 in the process, while Fortescue Metals chief executive, Andrew Forrest, got on his megaphone for a fresh blast, this time talking in terms of a resource base topping one trillion tonnes (yes, trillion!), a bold prediction which helped the stock climb A18 cents to A$4.22. Elsewhere, Golden West (GWR) continued its rapid recovery, adding another A9 cents to A61.5 cents.

Other iron ore moves included Atlas (AGO), which rose A7 cents to A$1.88, Giralia (GIR) which rose A8 cents to A$1.14, and Iron ore Holdings (IOH), which remained a firm speculator’s favourite, and put in a rise of A17 cents to A$1.47. On the flipside, Northern Iron (NFE) disappointed with an update from its Norwegian project, which included news of a first shipment which was outside required ore specifications. That news knocked the share price down by A20 cents to A$1.58. BC Iron (BCI) also lost ground, putting in a fall of A4 cents to A$1.11, and Brockman (BRM) eased back by A3 cents to A$1.94.

Minews. Base metals now, please.

Oz. Copper was the best of the base metals, with most stocks stronger. Nickel stocks were mixed, and zinc remained as dull as it has been for much of the year. Star of the copper crop was Blackthorn (BTR), a company once known mainly for its zinc interests, but now delivering excellent copper results from its Mumbwa project in Zambia. It rose a very strong A24 cents to close at A65 cents, a shade under a 12 month high of A68 cents reached during Friday trade.

Minews. We might take a closer look at Blackthorn next week. It seems to be a company making a solid return.

Oz. Quite right. Other copper stocks on the move included Equinox (EQN), which reported a 77 per cent increase in profit for the September quarter, the best sign yet that its Lumwana project is delivering on its early promise. That result boosted the stock by A25 cents to A$4.06. Elsewhere, Vulcan (VCN) added half a cent to A13 cents after reporting a bargain-basement plant acquisition, and Cape Lambert (CFE), which is re-inventing itself as a base metals specialist, added A7.5 cents to A55 cents. Fallers among the copper stocks included Sandfire (SFE), down A14 cents to A$3.94, Talisman (TLM), down A2 cents to A96 cents, and Citadel (CGG), down by A1 cent to A43 cents.

Mirabela (MBN) led the way down among the nickel stocks, losing A16 cents to A$2.84, while Mincor (MCR) lost A7 cents to A$1.99 and Western Areas (WSA) eased back by A3 cents to A$5.18. Panoramic (PAN) and Minara (MRE) evened the score out a little, with rises of A15 cents to A$2.50, and A3.5 cents to A86.5 cents respectively. Zinc stocks did very little. Perilya (PEM) fell A2 cents to A48.5 cents, and CBH (CBH) added A1.2 cents to A11 cents.

Minews. Uranium, coal, and specials to finish, please.

Oz. Most uranium stocks trended down with the exceptions being Manhattan (MHC) which continued to lead the sector, this week putting in a rise of A17 cents to A$1.37, and Paladin (PDN), which joined in with a rise of A10 cents to A$4.22. Extract (EXT) continued to ease back after its meteoric run, shedding A37 cents to A$7.94, while Mantra (MRU) lost A24 cents to A$4.44. Coal stocks were also generally easier with Macarthur (MCC) slipping A42 cents lower to A$9.21 and Coal of Africa (CZA) down a fractional A1 cent to A$1.89. Riversdale (RIV) went the other way with a rise of A17 cents to A$5.75.

Best of the stocks in the specials category were Moly Mines (MOL) which continues its recovery after a difficult year, and rose another A13 cents to A$1.04, and Minemakers (MAK) which rose by A5 cents to A42 cents.

Minews. Thanks Oz.
 
November 19, 2009

When Will Inflation Really Hit Us?

By Terry Coxon, Editor, The Casey Report
www.minesite.com/aus.html

Most of us are gathered at the station, watching for the Inflation Express to come rumbling in. But we've been waiting for a while now. Just when should we expect the big locomotive to arrive and start pushing the prices of most things uphill? We’d all like to know the exact date, of course, but no one can know for sure. Not even a careful reading of the Mayan calendar will help. What we can do is estimate a time range for price inflation to show up, and that alone should have some important implications for investment decisions.

The reason for expecting price inflation is the recent, rapid growth in the money supply and the deficit-driven likelihood that more such growth is coming. As of July, the M1 money supply (currency held by the public plus checking deposits) had grown 17.5 per cent in a year's time. That's not just unusually rapid, it's extraordinarily rapid. Since 1959, M1 has grown more rapidly in only one other 12-month period – and that was the one ending last June, when the M1 money supply jumped 18.4 per cent. Even in the inflation-plagued 1970s, growth in M1 never exceeded 10 per cent in any 12 months.

Dropping large chunks of newly created money into the economy leads to price inflation, because the recipients are likely to find themselves overprovisioned with cash. As they try to unload the excess, they bid up the prices of the things they buy, whether it be stocks, shoes, gasoline, silver coins, or granola. The sellers of those things then find themselves cash rich and start doing some buying of their own, and so the wave of excess money and the bidding it inspires propagate through the economy.

The process isn't instantaneous. It takes time. Just as each player in the economy has a sense of how much of his wealth he wants to hold in the form of money, everyone will move at his own speed to make adjustments when his actual cash holdings seem to be off target. And the process can seem to stall, especially when fear is growing. When people are worried or otherwise feel a heightened sense of uncertainty, they will gladly hold on to abnormally large amounts of cash – for a while. But when fear abates, as it will when the economy begins to recover from the recession, that temporary demand for extra cash will also fade, and the hot-potato process of trying to pare down cash balances will emerge to do its inflationary work.

But when? The speed at which the public tries to unload excess cash and the timing of the effects have actually been measured, in the work of the late Milton Friedman and his monetarist colleagues. The method was indirect and roundabout, and so the results, unsurprisingly, were nothing as precise as nailing down the value of a physical constant.

What the monetarists (or the first of them to be equipped with computers) found was that when the growth rate of the money supply rises the initial effect is on the prices of bonds and stocks, an effect that comes within a few months; the peak effect on the growth rate of economic activity comes about 18 to 30 month; after the pick-up in the growth rate of the money supply; and the peak effect on the rate of consumer price inflation comes about 12 to 18 months after that, which is to say it comes 30 to 48 months after the peak growth rate in the money supply.

As Friedman famously put it, the lags in the effects of changes in monetary policy are "long and variable." He might have said, "It's a big, wide blur, but we're sure we've seen it." And even that picture exaggerates the precision that's available to us. The emergence of money substitutes, such as NOW accounts and money market funds, has added its own muddiness to the picture of how growth in the money supply translates into growth in the level of consumer prices. It is only because the recent episode of monetary expansion has been so extreme that we can look to the results just listed for an indication of what's to come.

If you apply the findings of the monetarists to the present situation, here's what you get. The peak growth rate in the money supply occurred last December, so based on the general monetarist schedule, some of the effect on stocks and bonds should already have been felt. The peak effect on economic activity should come between the middle of 2010 and the middle of 2011. The peak effect on consumer price inflation should come between the middle of 2011 and the end of 2012.

This time around, should we expect things to move more rapidly or more slowly than average? My bet is on slow, which would push the peak inflation rate out toward the end of 2012. One reason for slow is that the government's rescue packages are delaying the process. Rescuing banks that are choking on bad loans postpones the day of reckoning for both the banks and the loan customers. It retards the pace of foreclosure sales (whether of real estate or other collateral) and puts the deleveraging that has been going on since last fall into slow motion. A wilting of the recent stock market rally would confirm this.
.
When you hear would-be opinion leaders cite the current absence of rising prices at the supermarket as proof that all the new money isn't a source of inflation, don't believe them. It is much too early for the inflation bomb to be going off, even though the powder has been packed and the fuse has been lit. If the large and growing federal deficits and the Federal Reserve's unprecedentedly easy policies tempt you to leverage up on inflation-sensitive assets, such as gold, give the idea a second thought. It likely will be a year or more until price inflation becomes obvious and undeniable (which is what it would take to bring the general public into the gold market). In the meantime, your inflation-sensitive assets could get paddled rudely as the deleveraging that began last year continues.

For at least the next year, the simple, fire-and-forget strategy is 50-50 gold and cash – gold for what looks to be inevitable but on its own schedule, cash to be ready for the bargains that may show up while we're waiting for the inevitable to arrive.
 
Buttonwood

Something's gotta give

Nov 19th 2009
http://www.economist.com/businessfinance/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=14921319

Either central banks are wrong to keep rates low, or markets are wrong to expect recovery.

Like a truck rolling downhill, the rally in risky assets is proving hard to stop. Good economic news causes share prices to rise because it indicates the recovery is robust; bad economic news also causes prices to rise because it signals that central banks will keep interest rates near zero.

Those low interest rates have probably been the main driver of the rally, encouraging investors to put their cash to work in search of higher returns. But other factors have been at play. Forecasts for corporate profits have been revised steadily upwards as analysts anticipate the benefits of economic recovery.

This has been a revival in the bottom, rather than the top, line. According to Morgan Stanley, non-financial stocks in the S&P 500 beat third-quarter earnings growth estimates by an average nine percentage points. But the companies’ sales fell around a point shy of forecasts. A similar pattern was seen in Europe.

In short, companies have used the crisis to achieve a remarkable expansion in margins. Tim Bond of Barclays Capital reckons that, on one measure, the improvement over the last two quarters has been the best since the second world war. The trick has been the corporate sector’s success in controlling labour costs; in the third quarter, operating costs for non-financial S&P 500 companies were down by 32% from the previous year.

But the weakness in earnings and the job market means that consumer confidence is far from robust; the University of Michigan sentiment survey has fallen in each of the last two months. Nor are consumers borrowing to maintain their spending; instead they have been repaying their debts.

American retail sales were stronger than expected in October, thanks largely to the car industry. Even so, they were still down on the same month last year. The decline might have been worse had homeowners not benefited from the sharp fall in mortgage rates.

Against such a background, how long can an improvement in corporate profits be maintained? Cutting costs makes sense at the individual company level but not in aggregate; one company’s sacked worker or pay freeze translates into another company’s sluggish demand.

That may explain why the improvement in profits is not translating into a splurge of capital expenditure. Nevertheless, in the short term the revival in corporate profits is adding to the sense of recovery. Companies seem to be taking the chance to improve their balance-sheets, building up cash reserves instead of repaying bank debt; commercial and industrial loan books are still contracting. And with companies having little need for more debt, banks are indulging their appetite for buying government bonds.

This strategy (with the help of central banks’ purchases of bonds) is helping to hold down yields, making it easier for governments to finance their deficits. With inflationary pressures still very low (American core producer prices rose just 0.7% in the year to October), there is very little need for the Federal Reserve to raise interest rates in the near future. The cost of borrowing for six months in dollars is now lower than the cost in yen, something that would have been unimaginable just five years ago.

Instead, the main threat to the rally seems likely to be disappointing growth, at least in the developed world. American industrial production rose just 0.1% between September and October and a number of other industrial-activity figures have been disappointing. The Economic Cycle Research Institute’s leading index slipped to an eight-week low in the week to November 6th.

Meanwhile, the Chinese boom that seemed to revive the global economy is showing its dark side. Commodity prices are rising across the board, acting as a further tax on hard-pressed Western consumers (oil has roughly doubled since the start of the year). In some countries, particularly in Europe, actual taxes are starting to rise as well, as governments grapple with their fiscal deficits.

At some point, the central dilemma at the heart of this rally will have to be resolved. Low interest rates seem like good news for investors. But why are central banks holding rates so low? Either they are correct in assessing that the economy is still fragile, in which case corporate profits will ultimately disappoint. Or they are underestimating the strength of the recovery, in which case inflationary pressures will start to emerge (and bond yields will rise sharply). Markets will have a tricky time navigating between this Scylla and Charybdis in 2010.
 
November 23, 2009

Commodity Bulls Bank On Inflation, But Bond Markets Say Otherwise

By Rob Davies
www.minesite.com/aus.html

The battle between the trillions of dollar invested in bonds and the relatively, miniscule US$240 billion that’s in commodity funds continued this week, with a decisive win for commodities. Even though yields on 10 year Treasuries fell to 3.34 per cent, aluminium and copper both rose by 4.4 per cent over the week. In reality the tussle is between those who think that inflation is not a problem and those that think while it might not be now it soon will be.
Consensus opinion is represented by the bond market. Its view of the economic world is that with such vast amounts of overcapacity in so many parts of the world there is absolutely no chance of inflation being a problem for the foreseeable future. Commodity bulls, on the other hand, think that the prodigious levels of liquidity being foisted on to the markets can only result in rampant inflation.

Of course inflation is precisely what governments want, in order to shrink the real value of their debts. Not that they will admit it of course. And it is amazing how many people believe governments when they say they support a strong dollar and will not promote inflation.

Bill Gross of bond fund management company PIMCO points out there is US$4 trillion dollars in US money markets earning precisely zero per cent, because its owners are so terrified of losing their capital.

What will happen instead is that the stealth tax of inflation will gradually erode the purchasing power of cash. What costs US$100 to buy now will need, say, US$107 next year. Keep that up for ten years and the buying power of that cash will have halved.

So, bizarrely for a bond fund manager Mr Gross is recommending people buy equities, simply because they yield more than cash and a more than lots lot of bonds. How long can it be before he starts promoting commodities for investors?

Getting no income at all but preserving the real, not just the nominal, value of your capital might one day be the trade to go for. One thing that is significant about equities these days is the low level of trading. Most people are too shocked by the last two years to make any decisions at all. Trading will only happen once the obvious action is clear to all. That proof is, of course, generated by rising prices. And the same can be seen in commodities.

Silver has maintained its reputation for steady growth by getting up to US$18 an ounce. Older heads will recall that it once traded at US$50 an ounce. Until such levels are re-attained many potential investors will look and wait for a pull back before buying. But of course when that happens many lose their nerve and assume the game is over. So they do nothing.

Then, the price starts climbing again and they kick themselves for not taking the plunge and that reinforces their belief in the asset. It is only when the last sceptic capitulates and buys that the bull market finally ends. Judging by the sheer scale of assets currently in cash and bonds that process for commodities has hardly begun yet.
 
Top