A lot of this in my view comes down to the parliament having a basic flaw in terms of who's there in the first place. We'd benefit enormously by having a lot more who meet at least one of these criteria:
Has run a successful business.
Has worked in the public service in a front line role that has no say in policy.
A background in any STEM career, having worked in that profession for at least a decade prior to entering politics.
Trades, military, emergency services, utilities, farmers and other practical "hands on" people doing work that must be done there and then no matter what the circumstances.
Any job that involves being on-call 24 hours per day with prompt response and fitness for immediate work mandatory.
Jobs where failure can't be hidden and bring serious consequences.
Anything that involves working at 3am.
Jobs where physical danger is inherent and can only be managed, not eliminated.
Because any of those teaches you things that have far broader application. They teach you things that can't be learned without first hand experience. Skills and knowledge that are clearly lacking among present politicians since, if they did have those skills, they just wouldn't have made the mistakes they have.
One of the key points being the unionists and lawyers will say those circumstances shouldn't exist. They'll say nobody should be on-call 24 hours per day, that nobody should be in danger, that nobody should work outside in a storm, that failure must be management's fault, and so on, in doing so displaying their ignorance of the reality faced by much of the population which is my point.