This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

The Albanese government

Who is going to be the first to try and knife Airbus next year?

  • Marles

    Votes: 1 8.3%
  • Chalmers

    Votes: 3 25.0%
  • Wong

    Votes: 1 8.3%
  • Plibersek

    Votes: 3 25.0%
  • Shorten

    Votes: 2 16.7%
  • Burney

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Other

    Votes: 2 16.7%

  • Total voters
    12
If you allow taxpayer incentives to only those who can afford to build a new home and at the same time demolish the value of established homes, don't you think that would have increased the gap between the rich and the poor.

Nah, NG was intended to encourage the supply of new properties, applying ng to existing properties does distort the market because it gives an incentive to investors over owner occupiers, hence the increasing the prices without adding to supply.
 
The above article was somewhat prescient.
From Evil Murdoch Press
Still only a flesh wound.
Mick
 
What is it about Pm's making grandiose promises they know cannot be kept?
Albanese has promised to build 1.2 million homes over 5 year.
From The Guardian
just the shere numbers are scary.
In 2020 there were around 190,000 houses built in Australia. to build the required 1.2 million houses will rrquire a further 240,000 houses a year for the 5 year period.
This is of course assuming that there will be sufficient extra tradies, sufficient extra timber, cement, bricks, plater tin etc etc.
I guess Alabanese's out is that so many of the constraints, land supply, approval processes, required infrastructure are all he problem of the states.
Stupid politicians, do they think everyone will conveniently forget this new and exciting promise?
Mick
 

It's all BS. Just think about #BlackOutBowen s promises for electricity price reduction and XX% renewables by 2030. Where's my $275 reduction in electricity bill?
 
It's all BS. Just think about #BlackOutBowen s promises for electricity price reduction and XX% renewables by 2030. Where's my $275 reduction in electricity bill?
It's amusing how certain pollies are castigated as liars, when not one could lie straight in bed.

They are all liars.
 
It's all BS. Just think about #BlackOutBowen s promises for electricity price reduction and XX% renewables by 2030. Where's my $275 reduction in electricity bill?
Promises promises all made under the protction of patliamtary priviledge.
 
It's amusing how certain pollies are castigated as liars, when not one could lie straight in bed.

They are all liars.
Wayne there's that old saying "they couldn't be starightened out on the rack" some are so bent they couldn't even be put on one.
 
The other problem is, the media ramp their favourites endlessly, so that the public have the promises burnt into their memory.
Then when the promises start failing the public is very aware of it.
 
I don't mind the kid getting the internship. Nothing really dodgy there.

But, The Chairman's Lounge? Bidenesque.

 
I don't mind the kid getting the internship. Nothing really dodgy there.

But, The Chairman's Lounge? Bidenesque.

View attachment 161230

Yeah, a bit of influence peddling there apparently, but I don't see why Albo should have to declare that as a 'registerable interest' as his son is not a minor any more so it doesn't affect Albo's interests.
 
Yeah, a bit of influence peddling there apparently, but I don't see why Albo should have to declare that as a 'registerable interest' as his son is not a minor any more so it doesn't affect Albo's interests.
The problem is the optics.

PWC does not normally give out internships to anyone.
So why did the son get one?
Because of who he is.
PWC did not do it out of the goodness of their heart, they are looking for influence, like when some of those lucrative government outsourced consultancies come up.
My son calls it the private school networking scam that he is not a member , and that he blames me for not sending him to one of those expensive private schools.
mick
 
Yeah, a bit of influence peddling there apparently, but I don't see why Albo should have to declare that as a 'registerable interest' as his son is not a minor any more so it doesn't affect Albo's interests.

Agree, the Chairman's Lounge is not registerable. But, if he knew about it, do you think he thought for a second, 'hmm, that might not look good'. I tested this at the pub last night. ????
 
Agree, the Chairman's Lounge is not registerable. But, if he knew about it, do you think he thought for a second, 'hmm, that might not look good'. I tested this at the pub last night. ????
Perhaps you just need to change pubs.
time for a pub crawl.
Mick
 
The pub test these days IMO is would Scott Morrison have got away with it, if it was one of his daughters, I doubt it very much.

That's the problem with politics, you pile $hit on the Govt when they are in office, your bucket gets measured against it, when you attain office.

According to the then opposition Dutton was a warmonger when he was saying China was an issue, now what he said and did is boy scout stuff, compared to what's going on.

That's politics, the difference is these days everyone has google, so hoping on the public having a poor memory doesn't cut it anymore, which is great for accountability but difficult for politicians.



And these days now Penny is in Government


 
Albo hasn't "got away with it", he's been outed in the media.

Be sure your sins will find you out especially if you are Labor and the Murdoch media get onto it.
Or indeed Morrison and the SMH or the Guardian getting onto it.

That is the good thing about having both sides of politics having a left and right biased media,
it wouldn't work, if there was only one side given air, the voice would already be in.
 
Thankfully Labor are in office, there is a call to get a handle on the NDIS, well we did say it wasn't pensions that were a problem the NDIS was the elephant in the room and Labor are the only ones who can fix it.
The narrative would be completely different if the Liberals were in, so as was said many times, both sides of politics have to get a turn.


A rebooted Australian disability system should focus on delivering baseline services for all people with a disability and move away from individualised National Disability Insurance Scheme packages, particularly for young children, as cost blowouts threaten the scheme’s future.

Professor Bruce Bonyhady, an original architect of the NDIS who is now co-chairing the government-commissioned review of the $35.1 billion scheme, will say in a series of speeches on Tuesday that the fundamental shift is crucial to curtailing the scheme’s spiralling costs and improving equity for Australians who are being left out.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...