- Joined
- 10 December 2012
- Posts
- 3,632
- Reactions
- 9
In that case, I wonder why Slipper ended up in court over an essentially non existent offence ?
His appeal was successful and charges were dropped, because it is in fact not possible to legally define what is parliamentary business.
Is there someone with a less jaundice view on this ghastly witch that could give me the positives that B. Bishop would have been able to add to the upcoming conference of parliamentary speakers in N/York, that now, she will no longer be attending. The egotistically maniacally partisan behaviour in the role as speaker of the house of this deluded harridan, is more to the flavour of African despots, than anything equating to reasonable democracy...
Of course as caveat, she is Representative the North Shore of Sydney.
I'm with Clive on this one... Cathy McGowen for speaker.
Bishop resigns.
About time.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-08-02/bronwyn-bishop-resigns-as-speaker-abbott/6666172
"This has obviously been a very difficult day for Bronwyn Bishop…I think we should respect the fact that it's been a very difficult day for her,"
"I have not taken this decision lightly, however it is because of my love and respect for the institution of the Parliament and the Australian people that I have resigned as Speaker," she said.
"I think we should also be grateful that something has been done here that will resolve this vexed question of entitlements, as far is humanly possible once and for all," he said.
"Without wanting to underplay the significance of some of the errors of judgement which she herself has conceded and apologised for, I think she's certainly done the right thing," he said.
"What has become apparent is that the problem is not any particular individual, the problem is the entitlements system more generally
"We have a situation where spending is arguably inside the rules but plainly outside community expectations."
Does Abbott just not get it, or is he too afraid to show that he does
The degree of hypocrisy and denial that Abbott shows is mind boggling.
Did not Abbott himself have to repay money that he claimed for promoting his book ? Claiming that on expenses is as much fraud as was Bishop's helicopter ride. How that man can go barefaced in public with those types of rotting fish hanging over him is beyond me.
Oh well, good riddance. She was a disgraceful speaker and a disgraceful MP.
From memory, didn't Rudd have a bit of a name, for air travel?
Or is it, you think, that miss use of taxpayers funds will be confined to the Coalition?
That would be novel, to think Labor, don't have their noses in the trough.lol
It would appear to me, you as Labor do, shoot from the hip. I would think all sides of politics, will shy away from an investigation into miss use of funds.
I don't think for one minute, that it isn't a common practice and seen as a perk of office.IMO
The only thing I find mind boggling, is your bias.lol
Damn! Question time will be boring now. Who else could invoke 94a with such aplomb?
In that case, I wonder why Slipper ended up in court over an essentially non existent offence ?
From memory, didn't Rudd have a bit of a name, for air travel?
Damn! Question time will be boring now. Who else could invoke 94a with such aplomb?
I'm disappointed. I wanted her to survive until at least the first week of sittings for the entertainment value.
Oh well, good riddance. She was a disgraceful speaker and a disgraceful MP.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?