- Joined
- 14 February 2005
- Posts
- 15,340
- Reactions
- 17,656
In my present job we do get a number of "certificate optional" sick days each year and personally I've never used anywhere near the lot. Sick leave is for if you actually are sick in my view, it's not an entitlement that should be taken for the sake of it. I suspect that my own view might be biasing my thinking here somewhat, ignoring the extent to which some people probably would rort the system if they could get away with it.
Main reason I mentioned it as an example of inefficiency in the economy, is the difficulty getting in to see a GP when there's a spike in colds etc which happens every winter here. It just seems to be an incredible waste of resources to have people seeing GP's for no reason other than obtaining a piece of paper with no actual medical treatment provided.
Thinking of an other situation with with a similar principle, vehicle accidents. I'm not sure about other states, but in Tas the police have set up an online system for reporting "for the sake of reporting it" vehicle accidents not requiring police to attend. The basic concept is that you phone if you actually do need police to attend the accident scene, but if it's just a minor incident (no injuries, vehicles can be safely driven away) and you're only reporting it in order to keep the insurer happy then you can use the online system instead. It keeps insurers happy without using up police resources with minor incidents.
The medical certificate one might be difficult to address in practice I think, but as a general principle I do think that as a society we do need to be looking at things differently and be willing to accept the removal of unnecessary waste.
The tax system is another one. If an individual with straightforward finances (eg they have a job, a few work-related deductions and a bit of bank interest) feels the need to use a professional to prepare their Tax Return then something is seriously wrong with either the tax system or the individual. I think it was Howard / Costello (from memory) who suggested the idea of just giving everyone an automatic refund of $x and abolishing the minor deductions so as to reduce the administrative burden. In principle that idea seems sensible - same concept as the other things I've mentioned, trying to reduce things which are unnecessary and offer little or no benefit.
Where government comes into all this is leadership. Government really needs to be leading the debate about how to make Australia more efficient and why it needs to be done. At present, we're uncompetitive at just about everything and that's not going to do us any good in the long term.
sptrawler said:Those who are working want income tax reduced, those who are retired don't want tax increased and those on welfare want more money.
+1 to your entire post, sptrawler, though on the last above, politicians need to bear some responsibility for the creation of this entitlement philosophy.I guess a lot of the problem today is, people expect to get a lot more out than they put in, they have to realise that isn't the norm.
We need a leader with a strong enough personality to be honest with the Australian people. I don't think we're bludgers or malcontents by nature, rather need proper explanation of the need to change the prevailing attitude.
ABC election analyst Antony Green said it was a terrific result for the National Party.
"It's been a ringing endorsement of the national government and John Key and further decline for the Labour Party who have recorded their lowest vote since 1925," he said.
"Essentially this election the government is being re-elected on the basis of its economic performance. The economy is seen as doing well
John Howard persuaded us that we needed the GST and if he were still around could probably again persuade us to raise it to 15%. Mr Abbott would have the proverbial snowball's chance in hell of doing likewise.
Howard almost lost the 1998 election which was campaigned on the GST.
What's more, he only won the 1996 election by saying there will "never, ever be a GST". Another Coalition lie.
Had he not had a massive majority at the time, he would have lost. The GST has always been a vote loser since John Hewson lost the 1993 election campaigning on it. I doubt if any politician now has the guts to go to an election proposing to increase or widen the GST.
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/opi...-partisan-debate/story-fn53lw5p-1227108855477
Why do you Fabians try to twist things around to make it look worse than it is?
Firstly, Howard did not say "NEVER EVER", it was stated in such a way there would be no GST during that particular term in office...
I don't know if you are being deliberately disingenuous or are having a genuine memory lapse, but here is the evidence.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ixn9fFatdcs
So What?
I still say it referred to that particular term in office.
There is just no point trying to converse with someone so one sided, so your posts will gain no response from me in the future.
Hawke once said there would be no child in poverty by 1990....But of course would certainly would not want to comment on anything adverse to the Labor Party.
I never denied Hawke said that. I hold no brief for him apart from the fact I think he was a good PM for some of the time.
You denied Howard said there would "never, ever be a GST", and when I showed you the evidence you refused to believe it. That's one eyed.
Howard almost lost the 1998 election which was campaigned on the GST.
What's more, he only won the 1996 election by saying there will "never, ever be a GST". Another Coalition lie.
Had he not had a massive majority at the time, he would have lost. The GST has always been a vote loser since John Hewson lost the 1993 election campaigning on it. I doubt if any politician now has the guts to go to an election proposing to increase or widen the GST.
He won it, and that's all that matters.Howard "almost lost" the 1998 election:
It's much more about leadership and strength of character than it is about the actual few % on the total at the check out.
And how is that NZ can get the population on side with their GST which doesn't exempt fresh food etc?
It's much more about leadership and strength of character than it is about the actual few % on the total at the check out.
I'd be happy to pay more if it meant getting Australia back on track financially.
Australia is seriously lacking in decent leadership at the moment. Certainly that is the case in politics and I think that business leadership quality is declining somewhat too.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?