- Joined
- 25 July 2010
- Posts
- 1,120
- Reactions
- 284
Can someone with more experience explain to me how free cash flow works with TGR, I usually use "Payment for Property Plant & Equipment" as a proxy for Capex, but with TGR this amount is only slightly less than Operating Cashflow, meaning that I end up with very little free cash flow in comparison to EPS.
Normally I would see that as a big red warning, but I think in this case its actually not capex but the lease costs - regardless it has a very big impact on FCF!
I have some other more complex formulas I use for FCF and they also generate very low numbers.
I suspect there is something about a commodity producer in agriculture that I am missing here?
You need to figure out what how much of this is maintenance capex, and how much is capex building beyond current capacity.
Keep in mind they have a 3 year fish cycle and 5 year capex cycle (from memory). So as a very rough approximation, the capex 5 years ago is the maintenance cost of today.
There are better ways to go about calculating it, and I know a few years ago they gave a figure for this. But it's a start. Other factors to keep in mind:
- the seafood acquisition does muddy the waters
- they raised capital to expand whilst conditions remain favourable (more capex required)