- Joined
- 14 March 2006
- Posts
- 3,630
- Reactions
- 5
"Timing query over Storm Financial bonus"
"...documents, obtained by The Sunday Mail, claim Storm Financial Services' owners Emmanuel and Julie Cassimatis knew their company was $51 million in debt when they took the bonus payment."
Read the full story by Ainsley Pavey here;
http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/story/0,27574,25022697-3102,00.html
Hey Solly, Isi Dalle Court used to work at the old Storm. Essentially his model is the same, perhaps the only difference is that he only doesn't gear pensioners!! (that I know of) His cousin Gus Dalle Court was the operator of the Storm Cairns operation.
I know of one person who went there and they told him 'you have probably heard bad things about us?" They hadn't at that stage but thanked them for being honest and walked straight out the door.
Ok swazee, thanks for the post. I see that they are associated with the NAB Group with their offerings.
In light of the attached quote and article, and the abscence of any negative reply from any of the many Storm clients who have vented on this site.
I am going to assume beyond reasonable doubt that each and every Storm client had the capability to monitor every aspect of their investment online on a daily basis.
It would appear those that got bankrupted failed to that.
What else could explain persons allowing their debt to blow out their housing equity loan.
AFAIC their is no excuse for that laxity.
If I am incorrect, by all means correct me.
"
So don't trust anyone apart from yourself with your money.Not only did they have the capacity to monitor every aspect of their investment as often as they liked, they also had the capacity to...
* Monitor the stockmarket and the world financial and economic situation as often as they liked (in fact the media did this for them every day)
* Give specific instructions to their investment managers to reduce their exposure as the situation became increasingly risky.
* Follow up on those instructions to ensure they were carried out promptly.
Anyone who failed to do any of the above was clearly 'asleep at the wheel'......a deadly mistake when you've got investment money on the line - particularly geared investment money.
Had they kept their fingers on the pulse they could have removed themselves from harms way long before their accounts got anywhere near margin call.
* Storm plants and bank trolls.
* No better than the scum-sucking Cassamitisis.
* Tyre kickers and bottom feeders
* The 'pits'
* Sticking the boot in
The Sunday Mail reports that Andrew Symonds may have lost more than $1 million and Wally Fullerton Smith says he has lost everything...
The full story by Nick Leys and Michael Westlake is here;
http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/story/0,23739,25024254-952,00.html
Property sellers offered only a portion of what a property (is/was) worth.
But business is business.
Bunyip, Top post, this is all most the same as the tax avoidance scheme that was going around a few years ago, We had a friend that lost over $400 in that, they all got together and set up a fighting fund to take on the tax office, they lost again. When it is too good to be true, it is, and ALL SALES people will ALWAYS SELL YOU, WHAT GIVES THEM THE BIGGEST COMMISSION.Not only did they have the capacity to monitor every aspect of their investment as often as they liked, they also had the capacity to...
* Monitor the stockmarket and the world financial and economic situation as often as they liked (in fact the media did this for them every day)
* Give specific instructions to their investment managers to reduce their exposure as the situation became increasingly risky.
* Follow up on those instructions to ensure they were carried out promptly.
Anyone who failed to do any of the above was clearly 'asleep at the wheel'......a deadly mistake when you've got investment money on the line - particularly geared investment money.
Had they kept their fingers on the pulse they could have removed themselves from harms way long before their accounts got anywhere near margin call.
What's been interesting about this thread has been the contrast in attitudes among the Storm victims. Some - perhaps the majority - have been honest in facing up to their part of the responsibility for what happened. Some have admitted they went in with their eyes open. Some have admitted they were naive. Some have admitted their mistake in placing complete trust in their advisers. Some have admitted that they should have been more decisive by insisting that their instructions were carried out.
Others have shown a distinct reluctance to accept any responsibility, and have attempted to push all the blame on to someone else.
What's also been interesting is the reaction of a small number of Storm victims and at least one of their supporters. Those of us who have attempted to have a balanced discussion on this matter have been subjected to all manner of insults, such as........
* Storm plants and bank trolls.
* No better than the scum-sucking Cassamitisis.
* Tyre kickers and bottom feeders
* The 'pits'
* Sticking the boot in
Among other things....suffice to say that we've copped a tirade of abuse, insults and aggression for doing nothing more than telling the story how it is. Ahh well.......
TrevorA lesson then for all those who think they can demand what they think an asset is worth... it's only worth what someone else is prepared to pay.... lots of others are losing jobs etc and money isn't flowing and those that have been frugal and wondering when all the
I don't see someone as purchasing the asset off another as anything more then a business transaction. If a buyer of RIO shares now buys off someone who paid $130, how do you view the buyer, as taking advantage ?
I take the contrary view to you, surely the person buying the asset should perhaps be seen as a lifeline ? After all they need a buyer and in these harder times, buyers aren't that plentiful.
Amen.
I read this article in today's Sunday Mail in disbelief. How could a so called professional financial planner not have seen what was happening??Well that just about says it all......Wally Fullerton-Smith, a qualified financial planner, gets wiped off the slate by following his own investment advice!
It seriously questions Cary Ramm's views implying that financial planners are indispensable, and that we'd be fools to follow our own advice.
Carey also seems to place great importance on having a string of qualifications to your name, and years of experience across a broad spectrum of investment areas, if you're to have any hope of safely negotiating what he apparently sees as the minefield of personal investment.
Well Carey, I disagreed with you back then and I'll repeat that disagreement now....professional qualifications are a poor substitute for common sense.....I'll back common sense any day.
I reckon Wally Fullerton-Smith probably agrees with me.
Meanwhile, three of the former Storm Financial advisers wiped out by the collapse of the company were picked up last week by Sunshine Coast-based Infocus Money Management.
Infocus founder Darren Steinhardt employer former Storm advisers Bob Jones from Storm's Redcliffe office, Trevor Benson from Nundah, and Wally Fullerton-Smith - who sold his Gold Coast business to Storm two years ago - after "extensive" checks, satisfied they were victims of the Storm machine.
I read this article in today's Sunday Mail in disbelief. How could a so called professional financial planner not have seen what was happening??
Moreover, from the same paper:
Victims? Perhaps this is a description that can be applied to Storm's uninformed clients, but for a professional financial planner to be considered a victim beggars belief.
Let us not forget the many good Australian men and women in their 60's and 70's forced to go back to work to try and extricate themselves from this debacle.
The majority of them have been self funded retirees who wouldn't even know where a centrelink office was situated.
Financial Planners have to take the blame for their circumstances.
The industry is a joke.
If you don't believe me click on this thread on what the exams are like to become a Financial Planner.
https://www.aussiestockforums.com/forums/showpost.php?p=395356&postcount=95
gg
A while ago you told/advised me to get on with life and get over this. Well take some of your own medicine and stop "stirring the pot" You and your other experts/naysayers/fingerpointers ect.. on here hide behind a computer facade of self endorsed judgement of all posters before you and you just can't wait to chew up anyone that doesn't live up to your self made standards , obvisouly with little else to do..other than to see who bites . Well myself and i'm sure others are growing tired of your game.As someone else quoted "well it's been interesting" Well i'm also sick of bittin' and tired of fightin' I hope your life continues to be one never ending success story(yeah i bet)Not only did they have the capacity to monitor every aspect of their investment as often as they liked, they also had the capacity to...
* Monitor the stockmarket and the world financial and economic situation as often as they liked (in fact the media did this for them every day)
* Give specific instructions to their investment managers to reduce their exposure as the situation became increasingly risky.
* Follow up on those instructions to ensure they were carried out promptly.
Anyone who failed to do any of the above was clearly 'asleep at the wheel'......a deadly mistake when you've got investment money on the line - particularly geared investment money.
Had they kept their fingers on the pulse they could have removed themselves from harms way long before their accounts got anywhere near margin call.
What's been interesting about this thread has been the contrast in attitudes among the Storm victims. Some - perhaps the majority - have been honest in facing up to their part of the responsibility for what happened. Some have admitted they went in with their eyes open. Some have admitted they were naive. Some have admitted their mistake in placing complete trust in their advisers. Some have admitted that they should have been more decisive by insisting that their instructions were carried out.
Others have shown a distinct reluctance to accept any responsibility, and have attempted to push all the blame on to someone else.
What's also been interesting is the reaction of a small number of Storm victims and at least one of their supporters. Those of us who have attempted to have a balanced discussion on this matter have been subjected to all manner of insults, such as........
* Storm plants and bank trolls.
* No better than the scum-sucking Cassamitisis.
* Tyre kickers and bottom feeders
* The 'pits'
* Sticking the boot in
Among other things....suffice to say that we've copped a tirade of abuse, insults and aggression for doing nothing more than telling the story how it is. Ahh well.......
I read this article in today's Sunday Mail in disbelief. How could a so called professional financial planner not have seen what was happening??
Moreover, from the same paper:
Victims? Perhaps this is a description that can be applied to Storm's uninformed clients, but for a professional financial planner to be considered a victim beggars belief.
Begs the question, What did they know or believe with regards to Storms agreements with the Bank that they too would put themselves in such a position? They do know better!
A while ago you told/advised me to get on with life and get over this. Well take some of your own medicine and stop "stirring the pot" You and your other experts/naysayers/fingerpointers ect.. on here hide behind a computer facade of self endorsed judgement of all posters before you and you just can't wait to chew up anyone that doesn't live up to your self made standards , obvisouly with little else to do..other than to see who bites . Well myself and i'm sure others are growing tired of your game.As someone else quoted "well it's been interesting" Well i'm also sick of bittin' and tired of fightin' I hope your life continues to be one never ending success story(yeah i bet)
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?