Garpal Gumnut
Ross Island Hotel
- Joined
- 2 January 2006
- Posts
- 13,794
- Reactions
- 10,564
Alternatively, Mr Jelich understood very well the risks involved, but figured the potential profits were worth it. And he took clients along on the same ride.
I am not so charitable as you.
Re Manny being a 'superb salesman', yes, and that is the problem.
Storm investors were not looking for a smart sales job, they were looking for and expecting a realistic assessment of their circumstances and a genuine financial plan in accordance with their risk profile.
Agree.
I presume your whole post is pretty much tongue in cheek as most of your posts are.
I'm not sure, however, that the irony will be much appreciated by Stormers.
Given your level of enthusiasm for Manny, I might even suspect you are lining yourself up for a job with the revitalised Storm model. Need a reference?
Soft Dough, I disagree here. The market was pretty much in free fall and CBA couldn't risk holding further. They didn't have the 20/20 foresighted crystal ball to know that a recovery such as we have seen would have occurred.
"So nat'ralists observe, a flea
Hath smaller fleas that on him prey,
And these have smaller fleas that bite 'em,
And so proceed ad infinitum."
...
Strange thing about borrowing money from banks. Most people think they are borrowing from a bank itself. Reality is that, in general, they are borrowing other people's money. Yep, Mrs Jones, aged pensioner, who has $8k in a term deposit to cover her funeral costs, Joe Smith, warehouse supervisor, whose salary is deposited and used to fund his family's living expenses.
Usual suspects who, unwittingly, think they are just depositing money when they are actually lending the money to the bank (depositors are shown as a liability in the bank's accounts and where a banks statement is received it it normally produced from the bank's viewpoint - a credit is what they owe you and a debit is what you owe them! - hooray for double-entry bookkeeping.)
So when the funds of these "depositors" are at risk (margin loans, house mortgages, business loans, etc) you would hope that banks go in hard to recover the money they owe to other people. Probably, that is one of the factors which was behind the actions of the banks in regard to this Storm debacle.
But where the banks has stuffed up, to my mind, it is not the depositors who should wear the cost, and nor should they, but the shareholders. That is why they stump up the capital and wear the risks. At least, I hope they understand that.
So rectification of any cr&p lending decisions, through compensation, by the banks will flow through to those shareholders, be they Mrs Jones or Mr Smith (who may also be shareholders in order to supplement their income) and every superannuation fund in Australia, who will, quite rightly, wear the cost of any compensation to Storm former clients.
Those devastated through investing via Storm will more than likely not see it this way but that's understandable as well.
That's a most sensible post, Dock. I agree with you completely.
BOQ, on the other hand, are generating adverse feeling with their different stand.
Manny had the foresight that Adler, Bond and Skase had.
He had Jelich walking up and down the coast schmoozing and cajoling. He had a phalanx of advisers selling the product with 7% to Storm on every transaction.
The name of the game is to get enough muppets on board with a simple product, this he did.
He now goes up against amateurs and muppets, ASIC, other regulators, Senate committees and the banks.
The trick with being involved with a genius like Manny is to get out before the whole schamozzle goes **** up.
When he starts off again in Adelaide or Hobart or in some other city with financial problems, I'll be down there with my gumnuts to get in on the ground floor.
I might even approach the Financial Planners Association to get meself a license.
A Storm rep was on one of their muppet committees up until a short time before the whole show blew up.
For all I know Manny may still be in with them.
He is a bloody genius and much maligned on this forum for his charisma, money management and care of other people's assets. But he is Manny. And they are few.
SICAG still has Manny adherents involved and with their help he will fight another day. Go SICAG, go.
Good on you Manny. And keep the muppets behind you.
As Jonathon Swift said
gg
I might even approach the Financial Planners Association to get meself a license.
gg, was that you that registered www.iStorm2_0.com with ICANN ?
you crack me up mr gg-that is way funny i think i could trust you more than some other advisors i know about-where do i send my bag of money in the brown paper bag?? anither week where there is alot to read and catch up with-i wish i was there to see the king and queen of the shire squirm-looks like theres heaps more to come-when i look at whats happened i now know that the most important thing is to never never never give up-i see the impact on the extended family and friends and i know all these people cant be the cause of whats gone wrong-looks like the gurus arent the computer gurus they thought they were-i know nothing about computer programs but even me thinks theres something smelly about what was going on-who wopuld run a business where you cant monitor things properly and you are supposed to be the experts-i cant wait to hear more-hey stormies hang in there i reckon we are going to see more of the you know what hitting the industrial exhaust fan real soon
gg, I had this piece of toast pop up out of the Hotpoint this morning. Not sure what it means but it seems fortuitous that it happened on the day you launched iToast. It looked a bit misshapen and I was just going to throw it in to the composter like I usually do with spoiled food. But then I noticed it didn't look like any piece of toast I'd seen before. I took a closer look, at first I thought I could see a vague outline of a Madonna (Madge) but alas I was mistaken, secondly I thought I could see a faint outline of a famous Nazarethian chippie holding a mitre box but again I was mistaken.
Maybe it's a sign from a higher level, I don't know but maybe it could it be considered as a basis for the trademark for your new venture. I've been staring at it on and off all day. From one angle there appears to be a element of super hero about it, maybe a financial super hero. Another angle it looks a bit cat like, you know stealthy and sneaky just what you need to be in the finance game. As the night fell and the soft rays of sunset diffused, it took on the appearance of a previous mother-in-law, frankly that was a little unsettling. I think it was the stubble.
Anyway here's the pic;
gg, I had this piece of toast pop up out of the Hotpoint this morning. Not sure what it means but it seems fortuitous that it happened on the day you launched iToast. It looked a bit misshapen and I was just going to throw it in to the composter like I usually do with spoiled food. But then I noticed it didn't look like any piece of toast I'd seen before. I took a closer look, at first I thought I could see a vague outline of a Madonna (Madge) but alas I was mistaken, secondly I thought I could see a faint outline of a famous Nazarethian chippie holding a mitre box but again I was mistaken.
Maybe it's a sign from a higher level, I don't know but maybe it could it be considered as a basis for the trademark for your new venture. I've been staring at it on and off all day. From one angle there appears to be a element of super hero about it, maybe a financial super hero. Another angle it looks a bit cat like, you know stealthy and sneaky just what you need to be in the finance game. As the night fell and the soft rays of sunset diffused, it took on the appearance of a previous mother-in-law, frankly that was a little unsettling. I think it was the stubble.
Anyway here's the pic;
I'll pass on the logo for the present thanks Solly. I've had 4 mother in laws and they all merge into that one piece of toast.
The first at the top is of a toaster, where anyone who doesn't toe the line ends up, except me of course. Come Valentines Day I'll post a clearer picture of corporate governance and the dangers of not adhering to it.
It is important in any enterprise to get a Professional Association behind you, which is the FPA, the picture below the toaster on the left.
And of course one needs a board of directors who are open and opaque in their dealings with the public and any millions left in the kitty when it all goes **** up. The Board of Directors is on the bottom.
gg
gg, your outfit is looking more and more reputable by the minute, I'm giving Whittakers a big miss now, especially since I found out CBA bought St Andrews.
I suppose as you grow you'll need all the trappings. When your are looking for the corporate jet, I suggest you give the Beechcraft a miss, go for something a little bigger and with more punch and range. I believe there's a couple of QF 744s heading for Mojave soon. I'm sure you could do a deal with Big Al, maybe even negotiate a dry lease. I know a couple of old drivers that would be interested. I think their suspensions are almost served and may soon be allowed in oz airspace.
gg, I had this piece of toast pop up out of the Hotpoint this morning.
Anyway here's the pic;
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?