Julia
In Memoriam
- Joined
- 10 May 2005
- Posts
- 16,986
- Reactions
- 1,973
Wouldn't you or whoever was the client have received all the documentation when the loan was made?
It would also be interesting to know, if any of you investors can explain this, what you actually received from Storm in terms of documentation.
e.g. was there a written investment strategy, detailing level of risk?
That would be the most basic expectation I'd have if consulting any financial adviser.
What sort of risk assessment did they do in interview to determine appropriate level of risk?
How did they determine your aspirations/what you wanted the plan to do for you?
Agreed. My questions above were designed to discover how professional the approach from Storm was, in that all the above should have been undertaken before any investment was made. They were not meant to underline the naivete of the investors. I'm trying to work out what liability Storm may have. My understanding (which could be wrong) is that to carry out a proper risk assessment and provide an investment strategy is mandatory.Julia, from reading the stories on this thread, it looks a bit like Storm may have taken advantage of people with very little knowledge of investment or risk.
I realise that. I wasn't suggesting they should have instigated the risk profile, investment strategy etc., but was simply asking if this had happened. The question does not reflect on the clents, but on Storm.They acknowledge that they knew nothing and that's why they went for help. Would be doubtful if they would have known the right questions to ask.