- Joined
- 28 May 2006
- Posts
- 9,985
- Reactions
- 2
... While I like labor acting fast I would also like to know exactly what’s been going on behind the scenes. I do not think that just because of a crisis they can try any ill conceived idea they can come up with (anyone keeping count?).
2020 are you saying we should be kept in the dark? Surprising statement from you ...
Seems that the Treasury and the RBA like to keep their advice confidential. Seems that they are not normally bound to say anything whatsoever ... (though on this occasion they agreed to do so).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/35de1/35de176c02564355a2b73014bc1179ebd13dfc71" alt="Two Cents :2twocents :2twocents"
On the other hand (and lol - as they say , these economists have a lot of hands
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/35de1/35de176c02564355a2b73014bc1179ebd13dfc71" alt="Two Cents :2twocents :2twocents"
Here's crikey's take on last week's grilling :-
http://www.crikey.com.au/Politics/20081022-Ken-Henry-grilling-senator-wheel-spinning.html
Ken Henry's estimates grilling: senatorial wheel spinning
Wednesday, 22 October 2008
Canberra correspondent Bernard Keane writes:-
Stephen Conroy, representing Wayne Swan, was there first ... until Treasury officials joined him at the last moment followed, eventually, by Henry himself.
Treasury Dep Sec David Gruen read a fascinating opening statement – if you’re fascinated by such things -- on the current economic environment and the pointlessness of trying to produce meaningful and useful forecasts during a crisis of unprecedented size and speed.
This confirmed what we’d previously heard from Laura Tingle in The AFR – that there were no Treasury forecasts – not even preliminary ones – that formed the basis of the Government’s bank guarantee and economic stimulus measures. Instead, Gruen explained, it was better to consider the likely risks to growth rather than wasting time trying to churn out forecasts that didn’t add anything useful to our understanding of the situation.
But bugger all that, the Coalition Senators wanted to get onto the point-scoring. Helen Coonan and Eric Abetz, at his officious best, led the charge, but that came a cropper against Henry, who seemed tired – surprisingly – and irritable at having to repeat himself every time a different combination of words was tried on him.
Conroy points out not normal to discuss "what had occurred between Treasury/RBA and ministers" ... but Henry "wanted to clear it up"
Stephen Conroy tried to run some interference by pointing out that the entire debate was actually about what had occurred between officials and ministers, which in normal Estimates circumstances ... is out of bounds, but Henry declared himself eager to make an exception and clear the matter up.
Eventually, Rudd and his officials might wonder at the wisdom of so readily dragging Cabinet discussions into the open for the sake of a minor political grassfire, but that can wait.
....
“Far be it from me to offend anyone, and especially you Senator,” Henry began drily, “ but there’s been some misunderstanding about the term ‘cap’.” He went on to explain the difference between a cap on the guarantee and a cap at which point deposits would be treated as wholesale lending and thus attract a cost to access the guarantee.
Abetz looked like Henry was speaking to him in Swahili. His Coalition colleagues, furious at failing to get anywhere, then tried to ping Henry for refusing to answer questions when he declined to detail his discussions with the Reserve Bank, and then started chasing their tails on what advice he had provided on refusing to answer questions.
It costs a lot for senators and senior officials to sit around and spin their wheels like this.