Looks like there could be a repeat in the winds....
http://www.news.com.au/national/youth-no-stranger-to-police-or-courts-teen-joyriders-long-criminal-history/story-e6frfkvr-1226336629317
What exactly are teenagers doing in a stolen car, at 4am, in Kings Cross????
What exactly are teenagers doing in a stolen car, at 4am, in Kings Cross????
Exercising their 'indigenous' rights in their country. How dare the Police strike a mere teenager
The kids are obviously out of control, but that does not justify shooting two of them.
That is a very low statement.
If you can't see that the police where heavy handed in this incident, you are a dope as well as a racist.
The kids are obviously out of control, but that does not justify shooting two of them.
That is a very low statement.
If you can't see that the police where heavy handed in this incident, you are a dope as well as a racist.
When a women is stuck under the car as they drive over her then its reason to shoot.
When a women is stuck under the car as they drive over her then its reason to shoot. I back the cops on this one.
Pulling the race card to win an argumentyou can do better
Whoa, didn't realize that.....should have read the link....was she killed?
CanOz
Police noticed the young driver and five passengers in the car and pursued on foot. Police alleged the car travelled along the footpath for about 100m as pedestrians jumped out of the way.
Officers pounced when one woman became pinned under the moving car.
"At which point OSG police drew their firearms and approached the vehicle to prevent serious injuries to the pedestrian who was now underneath the front of the vehicle," it was alleged in court.
... Imo it had little to do with race.
Pulling the race card to win an argumentyou can do better
Imo it had little to do with race.
Exactly, so re-read ColB's quote which he would not have penned if the youths were white?
So how would you have controlled the situation, Macquack? There's a woman whom they ran over, actually under the car. Tell us just what the police should have done, remembering the kids in the car were showing no indication of stopping and would almost certainly have injured more people.The kids are obviously out of control, but that does not justify shooting two of them.
If you can't see that the police where heavy handed in this incident, you are a dope as well as a racist.
+1.When a women is stuck under the car as they drive over her then its reason to shoot. I back the cops on this one.
Agree entirely.There will be a full break down of events in court and the whole lot will be looked at in the slow motion of hindsight. In the real world you get seconds to react and then driven by an emotional charge from the sheer stupidity of criminals actions. I don't condone the handling of the suspects after it but can understand how it happened. Imo it had little to do with race.
Exactly, so re-read ColB's quote which he would not have penned if the youths were white?
Exactly, so re-read ColB's quote which he would not have penned if the youths were white?
Just another example of an arm chair critic not armed with the facts passing judgement on the actions of others whose charter it is to protect life and property. [ColB]
If a girl was trapped under the car while it was moving then I believe the police did the right thing is doing whatever they could to bring that car to a stop, including the use of lethal force.
Once that car had been brought to a stop, and the passengers had been shot and were lying on the pavement, I don't see why that single police officer took it upon himself to dispense with his own kind of justice. For that, he should be brought infront of a court to explain himself.
Macquack, I understand you hold firm views, but using the word racist in this context is not useful. As a victim of racism, I would be extremely wary of using it myself, to describe another.
There are many other adjectives and adverbs in the English language better suited to your purposes above.
You run the danger of turning the word racist in to a pilgerism.
gg
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?