Australian (ASX) Stock Market Forum

Singles most taxed

Joined
23 August 2004
Posts
506
Reactions
1
All buit too true. this article sums it up. Society whinges about rascism sexism etc. What about us singles? We cop the highest taxes. Perhaps the government is discriminating against us.
Singles the biggest losers: tax report

By Josh Gordon
March 30, 2006

AUSTRALIANS are paying record federal and state government taxes, with a growing share of the burden carried by childless workers as families prosper.

A report by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development highlights the extent to which the Federal Government's tax system is distorting work incentives and churning billions of dollars of revenue back to families with children.

The report's data has already been included in the Government's high-profile review of the tax system, which Treasurer Peter Costello is due to deliver on Monday.

Sources close to the review have told The Age it will

give ammunition to those call- ing for reform, although it will not make specific recommendations on how to improve the system.

The OECD report found that last year income tax soaked up almost a quarter of the gross wage of an average earner with no children, up from 22.7 per cent in 2001.

In contrast, a typical single-income married couple with two children paid an average of 16 per cent of their wages in income tax after factoring in payments under the family tax benefit system. Five years earlier, the same family was paying out almost 23 per cent of earnings in income tax.

A separate report from the Australian Bureau of Statistics revealed that federal and state tax revenue hit a record 32.3 per cent of GDP last financial year, compared to 30.5 per cent in 2001-02.

Mr Costello said yesterday that Australia's tax to GDP ratio was the eighth lowest in the OECD, while the Government spending to GDP ratio was the second lowest, now lower than the US.

"Many … countries spend more and tax less because they run huge budget deficits," he said. "It's just sending (the) tax burden to the next generation."

The OECD report also says Australia has some of the worst work incentives in the developed world.

A single-income family with two children living on an average wage effectively loses 52 cents in every extra dollar earned in tax and reduced benefits, far above the OECD average loss of 37 cents in the dollar.
 
I agree Singles do carry a higher than average burden of taxes. And they are less likely to use the 'services' too - like the Hospital system, education etc etc. A double whammy.

And it is also reflected in things like Insurances - Health Insurance for singles is only about half that of families, who could have a gozillion number of children but still only pay the same.

But if we dont have children we dont have a market and so the whole system collapses.

Not sure how to fix this though :confused:
 
How to avoid high single person taxes -

get married (have some kids)

help Australia out!
 
Prospector said:
Not sure how to fix this though :confused:

This is the sort of issue that a consumption based tax (GST) was supposed to even out, but only half the job was done leaving us with the taxation mess we have now.

Rod.
 
dutchie said:
How to avoid high single person taxes -

get married (have some kids)

help Australia out!
Good in theory. Problem is a lot of marriages end up nulled, and once again it is the blokes who get shafted. Been there done that; never again, a whole lot of greive and spitefulness for a whole lot of nothing. Not to mention 10 years of hard earnt money going to lawyers and the ex.
 
crackaton said:
Good in theory. Problem is a lot of marriages end up nulled, and once again it is the blokes who get shafted. Been there done that; never again, a whole lot of greive and spitefulness for a whole lot of nothing. Not to mention 10 years of hard earnt money going to lawyers and the ex.

Old guy I used to work with told me his theory on getting married- Find a woman that You hate, then give her everything you own, and skip all the crap in between- you'll be less stressed and no worse off than any other divorced guy :)
 
Crackaton

I agree - been there, done that.

Up to 50% marriages end this way - a great (tax) burden on our society.

No doubt the young and single are paying for this failure rate but eventually they become part of it when they do get married. Its cyclic.

Solution - education (licence??) about marriage/relationships and bringing up children.

If everybody was more educated and properly prepared for marriage/relationships and the responsibilities and methods of bringing up children then society would save bucket loads of tax (and heartache).

If your young and single demand that education from our government!!
(your high taxes would then be benefitting you!!).
 
Married couples without dependants,and where the lower income earner gets over the tax-free threshold also pay full tote odds.
However I think that needy families with children to support should get the inside running.
After reading a few of these posts I think that there is a case to be made for arranged marriages...perhaps marriage is too important a decision to be made by the young and vulnerable.
When I got married many years ago ,a friend of mine gave me some advice (which I heeded)...he offered that the person that you married should be one that you believed that you could live with...this took precedence over looks,status,sexual matters etc.
Marriage... too important a decision to be left to the young?
Anyone know which is the more enduring,arranged marriages or otherwise ?
 
robert toms said:
When I got married many years ago ,a friend of mine gave me some advice (which I heeded)...he offered that the person that you married should be one that you believed that you could live with...this took precedence over looks,status,sexual matters etc.

Funny that - our builder told us to think likewise when we were choosing the tiles for our new bathroom :D
 
crackaton said:
Good in theory. Problem is a lot of marriages end up nulled, and once again it is the blokes who get shafted. Been there done that; never again, a whole lot of greive and spitefulness for a whole lot of nothing. Not to mention 10 years of hard earnt money going to lawyers and the ex.

Crackaton,

If it makes you feel any better, it's not always the blokes who get shafted.
After making substantial contributions to my last marriage, financially and otherwise, I left with nothing due entirely to the legal consequences of my then husband's actions. There was just enough cash after sale of house etc to pay the lawyers. Funny that!

I don't mind paying tax when I see it going towards much needed healthcare, aged care, education etc. (especially would like to see HECS reduced or abolished), but when I see it being dished out as family payments because the "low income earner" is claiming the benefit while her partner can be in the top 10% of income earners, then I am not happy. It is really unfair that, say, a manual worker on the basic wage trying to pay off a mortgage on a modest home is - via his taxes - subsidising the lifestyle of the rich.

Julia
 
Thought about being a self-sexual for a while .

But its hard to get a hand on the idea. :eek:

Bob.
 
Bobby said:
Thought about being a self-sexual for a while .

But its hard to get a hand on the idea. :eek:

Bob.


shhh... better be careful, it might give a pollie an idea to create a lotion levy ;)
 
Top