skc
Goldmember
- Joined
- 12 August 2008
- Posts
- 8,277
- Reactions
- 329
My immediate conclusion was an expensive stock which had run doubped/trippled would be "more" likely to start to move slower.
3 things
1. By expensive stock you actually meant a stock with a high share price. Expensive = share price much higher than it's value. High share price = a high numerical dollar value per share. Use the right term so your mind isn't confuse between the two.
2. A stock with high share price and a stock that had doubled/trebled are two different things again.
3. Without specifying timeframe, a stock the had doubled/trebled would probably move just as quick if not quicker imo.
Anyhow, I didn't read the pages you've attached (they were too hard to read), and I am not here to criticise what's right or wrong in the book you've read. I just offered some questions for you to find your own answers.
Something for another thread, if you want to pursue. Got some questions about the application of this concept in investment environments in contrast to low uncertainty environments.
Which other thread? I am a crap investor, and I am uncertain as to what you meant by uncertain environments...
Why do you consistently want to complicate everything with layers of crap.
Because ignorance is a bless? It rhymes!