IMV harassment is all over the place. The medical profession has a lot to answer for as does the military and police forces around the country.
But it goes both ways. Some women use their sexuality to get ahead. Maybe some would try this, get rebuffed and take revenge. These cases are never reported because it's politically incorrect to do so.
Very true SR, I wonder how many women are Not famous because they said No. If every woman had said No then merit would decide who got the role.
It also raises the question of how many women that are famous are only famous because they said Yes.
History shows that women have been using "charm" to get their way forever but I still find it sad.
Perhaps it is caused by our genetically programmed need to breed, nature does not care about civilized rules, it just wants us to procreate as often as possible.
I have six granddaughters, it is something that is of concern.
This is really, really disturbing and sad...
We have the situation where a noted High Court Judge is called out by multiple women for groping, sexual aggression whatever. The incidents are historical and until no fear of losing their positions has meant everyone bit their tongue.
Finally the dam breaks. The hidden abuse of power is exposed. And yet the response on ASF is
1) Well maybe women have been "using their charms" to get ahead or
2) How do we know any women who got ahead in their profession did so on merit at all ?
"Some" women use sexuality to get ahead. I don't think you can deny that it happens, it's been happening for centuries.
Like all of these debates it comes down to context.
Nobody would deny that a stripper is doing exactly that surely.
Nobody would expect a lawyer to be using that approach.
You don't think sexual favours, are used in the upper echelons of society?Like all of these debates it comes down to context.
Nobody would deny that a stripper is doing exactly that surely.
Nobody would expect a lawyer to be using that approach.
This is really, really disturbing and sad...
We have the situation where a noted High Court Judge is called out by multiple women for groping, sexual aggression whatever. The incidents are historical and until no fear of losing their positions has meant everyone bit their tongue.
Finally the dam breaks. The hidden abuse of power is exposed. And yet the response on ASF is
1) Well maybe women have been "using their charms" to get ahead or
2) How do we know any women who got ahead in their profession did so on merit at all ?
You don't think sexual favours, are used in the upper echelons of society?
It would be really naive or immature to even believe that an attractive woman would not use her charm just because it is a professional environment or against a vague code of conductLike all of these debates it comes down to context.
Nobody would deny that a stripper is doing exactly that surely.
Nobody would expect a lawyer to be using that approach.
Worked with a lot women (engineers mainly) never once seen or heard any use their female attractions to gain flavor quite the opposite saw incompetent males get higher pay, promotions etc over the girls who as a rule were better at their roles.
If I wanted clever solutions I usually went to the girls and that was right across all disciplines.
It would be really naive or immature to even believe that an attractive woman would not use her charm just because it is a professional environment or against a vague code of conduct
Female engineers huh. So they never batted their mustaches seductively at you?
Female engineers huh. So they never batted their mustaches seductively at you?
Yep it's hard being handsome.Haha actually most were attractive even the Mechanical Engineers maybe I got on so well cause I was a "chic magnet" .....like yourself.
Some of the Asian girls were insanely clever doubled everyone's work load.
Is anyone else asking the question as to why some victims wait over 30 years to make allegations ?
In the latest case, the alleged perp was not a politician at the time of the event, so there was not a power relationship involved.
I'm not saying it's not true, but any evidence would no longer exist.
Same with Bill Shorten. Allegations were made but never proved.
So why bother with it now ?
Agreed but I'll broaden that by removing a few words:There is a much bigger story developing in Sydney around sexual assaults on young girls by young guys.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?