Australian (ASX) Stock Market Forum

Schapelle Corby - Innocent or Guilty?

Considering the latest news, do you believe Schapelle Corby is innocent?

  • No, not any more

    Votes: 49 13.0%
  • No, never have

    Votes: 184 48.7%
  • Yes, always have and still do

    Votes: 80 21.2%
  • I don't care. Show me the stocks!

    Votes: 65 17.2%

  • Total voters
    378
My QUESTION to you is WHY did Mercedes stop them from testing the stolen drug sample??????????

I'm not sure where you're getting this crap from Mate, however, when I next speak to Mercedes, I will seek clarification on this point. We will both have to leave it alone until then.
 
I'm not sure where you're getting this crap from Mate, however, when I next speak to Mercedes, I will seek clarification on this point. We will both have to leave it alone until then.


Yes the sister has done OK out of this, new teeth, good money from the media. Now my crap is all from court documents, yours is all from the family who has been found GUILTY.
Hope your wife is OK, mine got over cancer 6 years ago, we have been traveling since then.
 
I have known Mercedes Corby for 25 years. I think I am in a better position to know what did, or did not happen, in relation to this matter.

Um....... this is the internet. You are an anomonous poster . How do we know if you even met any of the corbys and not just fell in love with a bleeding heart story .

Not that it changes the fact that she has been found guilty of being a drug smuggler.

I am in an even better position to know what happened as 3 days before she left my mate jonno had a threesome with mercedes and shapelle and during the pillow talk afterwards they asked him what would be the best sized bag to use to carry around 4kg of pot.

from where im sitting Jonno,s story sounds just as credible as yours .

Good luck with your crusade tho.
 
I just rang Jonno to double check his story and he assured me its true ... I have known Jonno 30 years now and can assure you and the world that he would not lie about something like this.

So there you have it, Guilty as charged, Jonno said so.
 
Um....... this is the internet. You are an anomonous poster . How do we know if you even met any of the corbys and not just fell in love with a bleeding heart story .

Not that it changes the fact that she has been found guilty of being a drug smuggler.

I am in an even better position to know what happened as 3 days before she left my mate jonno had a threesome with mercedes and shapelle and during the pillow talk afterwards they asked him what would be the best sized bag to use to carry around 4kg of pot.

from where im sitting Jonno,s story sounds just as credible as yours .

Good luck with your crusade tho.

What I find hard to believe is that Honorable is mixed up with a family that all most EVERY ONE has been in trouble with the police:banghead::banghead:. I guess the police have just got it wrong.:eek:
 
Pillows don't weigh 4 Kilograms.

Nulla Nulla, you are quite right, unless it's a very big pillow.

However, as I have already said, Schapelle did not carry the boogie-board bag to the Customs Counter, her brother James dragged it there.

If Schapelle had carried the bag from the pick up point to the Customs Counter, it could be argued that she had the opportunity to notice the extra weight, but she didn't.

She did not pick up the bag until both her, and her brother, were at the Customs Counter. Even if she had noticed the extra weight at that stage, it would not have helped her.

If your belief in her guilt is based on this, and this alone, you need to seriously re-evaluate your belief.
 
Do you mean the video clip of her banging her head (or was that later in court)? I thought that might indicate she was thinking something like " Oh crap, I've left the kettle on at home".

A number of people have suggested that Schapelle did this because she was thinking - "Oh you stupid girl, why did you do this?" However, this is not the case.

Just before the verdict and sentence was announced, the Chief Judge, Linton Sirait, told Schapelle's translator, Eka, to stop translating. As the sentence was announced, Schapelle, who had acquired a very basic understanding of the language at this stage, was attempting to understand the sentence she had been given, and was tapping her head in an attempt to work out what the words meant. You have to understand that she was extremely stressed at this time and her mind was struggling to comprehend what was happening.

When Eka was finally permitted to tell Schapelle the sentence - 20 years - a cry of "Nooooooo!" tore from her soul, and she hit her head for the final time.
She was gutted.
 
Um....... this is the internet. You are an anomonous poster . How do we know if you even met any of the corbys and not just fell in love with a bleeding heart story .

Not that it changes the fact that she has been found guilty of being a drug smuggler.

I am in an even better position to know what happened as 3 days before she left my mate jonno had a threesome with mercedes and shapelle and during the pillow talk afterwards they asked him what would be the best sized bag to use to carry around 4kg of pot.

from where im sitting Jonno,s story sounds just as credible as yours .

Good luck with your crusade tho.

I was wondering how long it would take you people to resort to stupidity, to support your mistaken believe in Schapelle's guilt, now I know.

Firstly, I have known the Corby's for 25 years, that is a fact, whether you believe it or not.

Secondly, your mate 'Jonno's' story is nowhere near as credible as mine. Clearly he must be a figment of your imagination, because any man with a dick long enough to screw two women, in two different countries, at the same time, would be World famous. And yet, none of us have ever heard of him.

Schapelle - Judged guilty - Yes - by a panel of 3 Judges who have ALWAYS judged their defendants guilty.

Schapelle - Actually guilty - No! - No hard evidence, which actually links Schapelle with the drugs found in her boogie-board bag, has ever been produced, by either the Balinese Police or Australian Federal Police. This fact remains true to this day.
 
Schapelle - Actually guilty - No! - No hard evidence, which actually links Schapelle with the drugs found in her boogie-board bag, has ever been produced, by either the Balinese Police or Australian Federal Police. This fact remains true to this day.

Apart from a 4kg bag full of drugs in her bag:rolleyes:
If your belief in her guilt is based on this, and this alone, you need to seriously re-evaluate your belief.

Yeah maybe the pot fairy put it there. In fact every one that gets caught with drugs on their person could resort to this defense.
Did you ask the brother why he didn't notice the weight?

I think she is guilty. I also think she has done enough time and it's time to bring her home. Women’s day and ACA await to shower her in riches (or does the profiting from being a criminal act thingy still come into play?).

You are pretty polished on your posts Honourable not a salesman or something in real life?

Secondly, your mate 'Jonno's' story is nowhere near as credible as mine. Clearly he must be a figment of your imagination, because any man with a dick long enough to screw two women, in two different countries, at the same time, would be World famous. And yet, none of us have ever heard of him.

I don't like to brag about it, except that one time to nun.
 
Yes the sister has done OK out of this, new teeth, good money from the media. Now my crap is all from court documents, yours is all from the family who has been found GUILTY.

You asked me whether Mercedes had stopped the testing of the evidence, stolen by Vasu Rasiah, the case coordinator on Schapelle's legal team. Who better to answer this than Mercedes?

The Corby family were obviously very keen to have the marijuana tested for THC content and place of origin. However, this had to be done through the proper channels, if this evidence was ever going to be used to help free Schapelle.

Mercedes did tell Vasu not to bother getting the stolen sample tested, firstly, because the results would not have been accepted by the court, and secondly, because she did not want to infuriate the Judges by presenting results from stolen evidence, as defense evidence.

However, none of this is mentioned in the court transcripts that I have. So, if you have something that I don't, please share it. Make sure you quote the Case Register Number, so I know that it is genuine.

Finally, I would trust anything that the family told me about this case, far more than any rubbish I read in a newspaper, saw on TV, or heard on the radio. I would also trust their word over and above any court transcript, which, at the end of the day, is just a documented record of the lies presented as Prosecution's evidence against Schapelle, who I know to be innocent.
 
Apart from a 4kg bag full of drugs in her bag:rolleyes:

Did you ask the brother why he didn't notice the weight?

I think she is guilty. I also think she has done enough time and it's time to bring her home. Women’s day and ACA await to shower her in riches (or does the profiting from being a criminal act thingy still come into play?).

You are pretty polished on your posts Honourable not a salesman or something in real life?

moXJO, clearly you did not read my post correctly, and have not read my previous posts.

No one is denying that 4.2kg of marijuana was found in Schapelle's boogie-board bag. The drugs themselves are hard evidence. However, no supporting hard evidence has ever been produced to link Schapelle in any other way with these drugs, other than the fact that they were in her boogie-board bag by the time it reached the Customs Counter. As her boogie-board bag was unlocked from the time it left her home to the time it was retrieved in Bali, anyone could have inserted those drugs, at any stage in the bags journey.

In order for the panel of Judges to convict, under Indonesian Law, the Prosecution must provide two pieces of evidence that support a guilty verdict. They only provided one in my opinion. Their secondary evidence consisted, primarily, of the testimony given by the Customs Officer who was at the counter when the bag arrived there. His testimony related to Schapelle's demeanour and actions at the time the drugs were discovered. His testimony was never validated by the CCTV footage from the camera above the Customs Counter, which it could have been, had he been telling the truth, and his testimony was seriously at odds with the testimony given by Schapelle.

Schapelle and her legal team requested that this CCTV footage be allowed into the court, to validate her testimony and refute that of the Customs Officer, but the Judge did not allow it.

Why would Schapelle ask for this footage, if it was going to show that she was lying? She wouldn't!

Why did the Prosecution not ask for this footage, to give validity to their witness's testimony? The camera footage, had it supported their case, would have constituted a second piece of hard evidence, because cameras don't lie.

James had no reason to notice the extra weight. It was not his boogie-board bag, and he had no idea what it weighed when checked in at Brisbane Airport.

I am not a salesman, but I am trying to sell the truth that Schapelle Corby is innocent, because I know she is. From my point of view, it is a truth that burns more brightly than the sun.

Yes, Schapelle certainly has done enough time for a crime she did not commit, and she needs to come home now! Yes, she may very well make some money from a movie or a few magazine articles, and after what she has been through, I hope she does! The government may try to invoke the Proceeds of Crime Act and seize the money, but I somehow doubt it.

Of course, the main stream media have already made bucket loads of money reporting lies, smear and innuendo in relation to this case and the Corby family, and no one has said a word about that.
 
.

James had no reason to notice the extra weight. It was not his boogie-board bag, and he had no idea what it weighed when checked in at Brisbane Airport.

Yeah sorry everything seems to convienent for me to believe she is innocent.

Someone else just happened to have the right size bag full of dope to fit into Corby’s boogie-board bag and form it into shape. They then flush roughly $45k down the drain and leave it in there. Nobody notices the extra weight as both carried it at different times. Then two custom's officers at Bali find the pot, and for no good reason decide to lie their ar$e off. All of Indonesia’s legal system then goes on a vendetta against her.

Hey I could be wrong and she is innocent. But imo I doubt it. Good luck with it though Honourable; I do respect your efforts and dedication.
 
What I find hard to believe is that Honorable is mixed up with a family that all most EVERY ONE has been in trouble with the police:banghead::banghead:. I guess the police have just got it wrong.:eek:

Where do you get the idea that almost every Corby family member has been in trouble with the police?

Schapelle's two half brothers have had minor brushes with the law, I have already admitted that in an earlier post, and both are now living respectable lives.

No other Corby family member has ever been in trouble with the police, with the exception of Schapelle's father who, many years ago, was caught at a party during a police raid, at which party a marijuana joint was found. He had a broken leg at the time and was the only one who could not flee. He received a $400 fine and no conviction was recorded against his name.

No Corby family members, apart from Schapelle's two half brothers, have a criminal record. See these police certificates:

http://schapellecorby-simbasgoogleb.../12/police-certificates-for-corbys-proof.html
 
Good luck with your cause Honourable.

I dont think she is innocent. I thought she was guilty the day she was caught and even after all her interviews.

At one stage I considered if it could have been a cover up for her brother, but if thats the case, she would have been charged anyways for covering up for him.
 
I was wondering how long it would take you people to resort to stupidity, to support your mistaken believe in Schapelle's guilt, now I know.

Firstly, I have known the Corby's for 25 years, that is a fact, whether you believe it or not.

Secondly, your mate 'Jonno's' story is nowhere near as credible as mine. Clearly he must be a figment of your imagination, because any man with a dick long enough to screw two women, in two different countries, at the same time, would be World famous. And yet, none of us have ever heard of him.

Schapelle - Judged guilty - Yes - by a panel of 3 Judges who have ALWAYS judged their defendants guilty.

Schapelle - Actually guilty - No! - No hard evidence, which actually links Schapelle with the drugs found in her boogie-board bag, has ever been produced, by either the Balinese Police or Australian Federal Police. This fact remains true to this day.

It seems that you are conveniently overlooking the key aspects of her being apprehended "in possession" of 4 kilograms of marijana. It is not the responsibility of the court to establish whether or not another party owned the marijuana.
It is a fact that the boogie board bag was hers, it is a fact that she was aprehended "in possession" of a large quantity of an illegal substance.
There was no way she was ever going to be found not guilty of this crime.

There is nothing different in this case to the numerous people comming into Australia that are aprehended and charged with importing illegal substances when "someone else must have put it in my bag". They get sentenced on the most incriminating aspect of the evidence, they were aprehended with the illegal substance in their possession.
 
It seems that you are conveniently overlooking the key aspects of her being apprehended "in possession" of 4 kilograms of marijana. It is not the responsibility of the court to establish whether or not another party owned the marijuana.
It is a fact that the boogie board bag was hers, it is a fact that she was aprehended "in possession" of a large quantity of an illegal substance.
There was no way she was ever going to be found not guilty of this crime.

There is nothing different in this case to the numerous people comming into Australia that are aprehended and charged with importing illegal substances when "someone else must have put it in my bag". They get sentenced on the most incriminating aspect of the evidence, they were aprehended with the illegal substance in their possession.

In normal legal jurisdictions the actual possessionis a matter which involves the need for the prosecution to prove knowledge to some degree but the big one is continuity; and , in doing that the Court needs to be shown that the defendant on reasonable grounds had sealed and placed the bag into the luggage department on departure and that there was unlikely to have been opportunity for outside tampering till she picked it up on arrival at her distination. There are so many holes in this prosecution it goes to the bottom at the speed of light.

So Nulla Nulla go to a thread where you know what you are talking about.

Of course the law in this other place does not have a law as we know it. If you dont pay you go to jail.
 
Top