- Joined
- 21 June 2009
- Posts
- 5,880
- Reactions
- 14
Guilty by the way .... IMO
On the first point, I'm not going to argue the point any further. You think your right, and I think I'm right. Even if there had been a motive for Schapelle to take drugs to Bali, and I don't believe there was, would she place the drugs in clear plastic bags, put these plastic bags on TOP of her boogie-board (no attempt to hide them), in an unlocked boogie-board bag, with her name on it, and attempt to take them to a country with the death penalty for drug trafficking? Would she then willingly open this bag to reveal them, without even being asked to do so by the Customs Officer? Would she then beg for every kind of investigation into her crime that she could think of, just to make sure that she really was found guilty? I don't think so!
Incidentally, did you check out the link on Aussie Gold that I provided?
On the second point, I did say COMMERCIAL quantities. I am well aware that there have been a few arrests of people over the years trying to take in small amounts for personal use, the most recent being Robert Mcjannett. He certainly made the news, just do a Google search and you will find plenty on him - see this link, one of many:
http://www.watoday.com.au/wa-news/b...calls-in-addiction-doctors-20100331-reog.html
The marijuana was in two space bags, one within the other. With the air sucked out of these bags, they are significantly less bulky than when fully opened. As such, it would have been quite easy not to notice the extra bulk.
Secondly, it was her brother James who took the boogie-board bag to the Customs counter. Because the carry handle had been cut at some stage in the bag's journey to Bali, James dragged the bag to the counter. Because it was not his bag anyway, he would not have noticed whether it was heavier than before. The only opportunity that Schapelle had to notice the extra weight was in the two seconds it took her to pick it up and place it on the Customs counter. Even if she had noticed it then, it would have been too late anyway.
In my opinion this is crap. 4 Kilograms of marijuana would still be bulky even if it had been vacuum packed before being placed in the boogie bag.
Take 4 kilograms of butter or meat out of your fridge and see how bulky it is and feel the weight when you pick it up. This is not lead or gold which has a higher density/mass than plant material and would be low in bulk due to its' high mass density. It was marijuana, plant material.
A 4 kilo bag would be bulky and the additional weight in the boogie bag would be immediately noticeable.
If she knew anything about rustling, and by many of your accounts here she must have been big at it then she would not have been so obvious..
Perhaps you you would be so kind as to provide several examples of the alleged "by many of your accounts" where I have made reference to "rustling".
I suspect you are generalising in respect of my posts in the same manner you appear to generalise in respect of the Scapelle Corby matter.
And us aussies do not dob.
That's an amazing statement from someone who claims to be an ex-copper. If you had any connection with the police, you would know that the crime clean-up rate would be very low indeed without dobbers. The police are not very good at crime detection and have to rely heavily on informants.
That's an amazing statement from someone who claims to be an ex-copper. If you had any connection with the police, you would know that the crime clean-up rate would be very low indeed without dobbers. The police are not very good at crime detection and have to rely heavily on informants.
What I am putting up a wild ideas to ballance the wild ideas about the hangum mentality and understanding (it seems to me) of law in society today.
That’s a crock of ****e. And yes I do know just how big a dobbers the Aussie crims are. Even bikies dob their own members in, on the sly.And about crime clean up of drugs, can assure you that you know little of policing to say that. The drug dealing community is very tight indeed and the consequences of dobbing in this usually becomes a sorry end in itself.
.
So I take it this is an admission that you are simply posting wild ideas to counter what you see as other peoples wild ideas and there is no substance to your protestations of her innocence.
I have deleted my original post as some of it was no one elses business.
The crux of it was
explod, was you in the lost property office whilst serving as a police officer ?
please get your facts right when it comes to police detection methods and various groups of criminals.
And she has taken the rap. And us aussies do not dob.
.
And about crime clean up of drugs, can assure you that you know little of policing to say that. The drug dealing community is very tight indeed and the consequences of dobbing in this usually becomes a sorry end in itself.
.
And I still think that is insulting and prepared to take action on it unless we have a reasonable retraction
No retraction.
do as you wish.
Personally finding your unfactual storys and personal opinions which you attempt to pass off as facts rather insulting on my intelligence.
have a good day , ive said my bit . do as you wish, this thread a waste of typespace.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?