- Joined
- 25 September 2006
- Posts
- 246
- Reactions
- 0
2 more trades for 5.5 pips each
Nett of 8.5 pips for the night.
Nice trades Prawn ... and so elegant ... keep them coming.
2 more trades for 5.5 pips each
Nett of 8.5 pips for the night.
hah, caught the same move, I can see you're taking the tory approach (nothing wrong with that!)
Ok so heres a breakdown of my results so far.
After 40 trades:
Total wins: 25 (63%)
Total losers: 15 (37%)
Average Win: 4.64 pips
Average Loss: -3.2 pips
Total Profit: 116
Total Loss: -48
Average return per trade: +1.7 pips
Scatterplot of all 40 trades shown below.
personally i would like to get my win % up above 75%.
Would appreciate any input please...
For an impoverished uni student that is more concerned with fundamental analysis of small caps, you are doing a good job of making the rest of us traders look bad
personally I think your win rate is fine. I'd maybe work on developing a hold button so you can step on the odd winner to really cash in. overall you are doing well though
LOL thanks Prof.
i must admit i never quite know when to exit. I think i just need to trust the rainbow a little more and keep holding as long as the price is outside of it. I just get a bit edgy and dont want to give up too much profit.
Appreciate your input
personally i would like to get my win % up above 75%.
Instead of studying for exams, i have been procrastinating by studying my past trades/charts etc.
For my last 20 trades i actually only had 4 losers, so that takes my win rate to the amount i was seeking.
Now my task is to maintain this win rate...
Hi Prawn,
Here's another way you can approach it:
A win loss ratio of 4.64/-3.2 equates to a risk:reward of 1.45:1. At 63% winners, you can expect to earn 1.74 pips per trade, or 54 percent of every dollar risked
Given the R:R of 1.45, you need to maintain a win rate of atleast ~41% in order to breakeven, not including transaction costs.
Personally I think you want to rely on your accuracy as little as possible - this means emphasizing the risk:reward pattern over the %winners.
If you want to develop a reasonable estimate of winning percent then you need a much larger sample than 40 or 50 trades, and I would say over an extended period of time (weeks/months) because the accuracy of any method or system is going to fluctuate with market conditions.
That way you have an idea when the method isn't in tune with the market and what you can expect.
All my profits i post here, and record are net, so the transaction cost issue does not matter in this case.
Any ideas of how to recognise the higher R:R patterns?
From what i have gathered so far, scalping (due to its ultra short term nature) is just about picking up quick pips here and there. Its hard (for me at least) to identify which moves will be bigger than others.
I totally agree here. Im not in any rush to go live and would like well over 100 trades before i consider doing so.
Having said that however, if im only executing 1 or 2 trades a day and getting my target (5 pips), its going to take quite some time to get a decent sample up. For example, i only had 8 trades last week with 7 winners and one loser, for a total of 30 pips. So to get another 100 trades or so will take a few months at least.
Thanks for your input, i appreciate it
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.