Tisme
Apathetic at Best
- Joined
- 27 August 2014
- Posts
- 8,954
- Reactions
- 1,152
They say kids are cruel when it comes to teasing the abnormal, but infact they are unwittingly expressing their natural coding for a strong tribe.
The children will be affected to varying degrees as they try to wrap their heads around an unnatural parenting arrangement. To think legislation will magically change the natural male/female -> offspring imprint will not happen. Psycologically modified children for selfish human desire and a f.y. to the natural beings.
That was quite funny.
Others would laugh out loud too if they don't have doubt about your Anglo heritage.
Yet you seem to think your own sexuality wasn't a choice? (if I remember correctly from prior discussions), or do you think at some stage you could have gone either way but you made the choice to chase ladies.
I can't see how anyone can think their sexuality is a choice unless they are a confused bisexual.
Can you please provide links to the peer reviewed studies and please make sure there is no association to Christian groups.
Somehow I think you cannot.
Agreed that it's not a minority.7.2 million Yes
4.8 million No.
Hardly a minority vote.
You just can't seem to comprehend that if you insist that sexuality is a "life style choice", you are also admitting that you feel like you chose yours.Don't be silly VC. You are just arguing for the sake of arguing and you will continue to argue any point so long as it's contrary to mainstream human development.
Rational?!!!Anyway, Australia has voted, Yes has it.
I will leave this thread now happy that they majority of Aussies are rational, and leave the rest of the bitter old men and Tink to stew in their bitterness.
Anyway, Australia has voted, Yes has it.
I will leave this thread now happy that they majority of Aussies are rational, and leave the rest of the bitter old men and Tink to stew in their bitterness.
I am not much fussed on which brand of religion No voters are.Well how do you feel that a large majority it seems of another of your protected species ie the Muslims voted No and are now stewing in their bitterness ?
Feel free to move to Lakemba and be part of the majority in Paul Keating's former seat.Well how do you feel that a large majority it seems of another of your protected species ie the Muslims voted No and are now stewing in their bitterness ?
I always thought they're digging up new things all the time, in the same locations/same name cities 2000+ years ago. Jewish culture probably has more to say about the details of Sodom /Gomorah and other very old stuff. I thought countries once had anti-sodom laws.It's not really. There is no archeological evidence for a lot of Bible stories, eg the Exodus, the great flood, Soddom and Gomorah etc, and most of bible history can be put down to myth, legend and allegorical tales.
Agree there. Complete allegory that book. Best seller.
The Church doesn't say that. As Pell said at the start people have their own view on it. The Catholic Church doesn't have an official view. His view would be different from other cardinals and popes. Also, at the start Pell points out that Darwin was a theist (found that interesting). I've also heard another story that Darwin was bitter at God when he lost his daughter, and that made him want to publish it all the more, but my knowledge about this is limited. What I've noticed though is that there are quite a few experts out there that don't see evolution as a provable fact, people who are seemingly honest. From a philosophical standpoint that's a problem.Even the Catholic Church admits that the Adam and eve story isn't fact, and that its a religious story told for religious purposes. There is absolutely no evidence for the biblical creation story, in fact the is mountains of evidence against it.
It will be fascinating to see the principled rejection of same sex marriages by florists
You lot obviously haven't experienced Christianity before. It goes beyond knowledge. Take a look at this:
(the clearer HD footage is what i'm interested in)
6:24-6:56
3:43-4:24
The people there are looking for God and healings so the best explanation would seem to be that (God). No myth going on here
Onto people's questions:
I always thought they're digging up new things all the time, in the same locations/same name cities 2000+ years ago. Jewish culture probably has more to say about the details of Sodom /Gomorah and other very old stuff. I thought countries once had anti-sodom laws.
The Church doesn't say that. As Pell said at the start people have their own view on it. The Catholic Church doesn't have an official view. His view would be different from other cardinals and popes. Also, at the start Pell points out that Darwin was a theist (found that interesting). I've also heard another story that Darwin was bitter at God when he lost his daughter, and that made him want to publish it all the more, but my knowledge about this is limited. What I've noticed though is that there are quite a few experts out there that don't see evolution as a provable fact, people who are seemingly honest. From a philosophical standpoint that's a problem.
Good to see the old luutzu breaking out from the handcuffs social engineering has placed on you of late. You know I'm not racist, but I don't like the way us anglo whiteys have been demonised by a queer movement and the disappointment of so many who have mind numbingly saddled up to their propoganda.
If it wasn't for people like me the world would have continued on as a feudal slave society ....you know just like China still is.
You're not wrong. It frequently crosses the line into the realm of Orwellian fiction. If there's a stairway to heaven and a highway to hell it says much about the anticipated traffic flowYou lot obviously haven't experienced Christianity before. It goes beyond knowledge.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?