This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Same sex marriage - Yes or No?

Same sex marriage - Yes or No?

  • Yes

    Votes: 77 55.8%
  • No

    Votes: 61 44.2%

  • Total voters
    138
Homosexuals, heterosexuals, they are all men and women.
Homosexuals cannot have children.

Marriage is about the family.

It takes a man and a woman to have a baby and raise that child.

Freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of thought, is about being able to tell the TRUTH.
 
If I click on this link I'll probably start getting ads for homosexual holidays

Great holidays if you want to get some free time for serious mans golf without worrying about the femme de corp insisting you show them some attention.
 
Jews and Christians are all for the gays are they?

True Christians = nope.
Jews = well look at all the apex actors out there in Hollywood who make a living out of subterfuge, sexual sluttiness, and publicity and they tend to all share the same ethnicity. The same ones who promote anti Anglo cultural norms and morals
 

I guess it's their way of getting back at the Christians for thinking they should get back the Promised (then all die) so Christ can return

BUt c'om, there's uncle Rupee in Hollywood doing God's work. Though rumour has it his empire is being offered up in the latest media consolidation drive.
 

The reason they got their promised land was because of largely christian fighting men from the Commonwealth countries who gifted them part of Palestine.
 
The reason they got their promised land was because of largely christian fighting men from the Commonwealth countries who gifted them part of Palestine.

Some British governor of the Middle East, in Britain's waning days as an imperial power, sign some declaration [Balfour?] that eventually lead to the UN giving part of Palestine to the Israelite.

They've since been very hard at work liberating for themselves the rest and fencing in ghettos. All with mostly American financial and military support. So your Commonwealth can't take credit for the hard work of freedom and liberty on this one McGee.
 


You need to read a little more my contrary friend and remember that USofA history is rarely the whole story. Oil trade was a big factor in the Americans doing a number on the British.

Lookup Mandatory Palestine.

Also count back to an earlier war and Beersheba http://ontheworldmap.com/israel/city/beersheba/beersheba-location-on-the-israel-map-max.jpg
 
Local pub owner posed this one to me last night:

If two lesbians divorce how do they get 3/4 of the combined assets each?

corollary:

I'm thinking I'd put my hat in the ring for the half the two male gays leave on the table.
 
Local pub owner posed this one to me last night:

If two lesbians divorce how do they get 3/4 of the combined assets each?

corollary:

I'm thinking I'd put my hat in the ring for the half the two male gays leave on the table.

Yeh same problem with the guys
After splitting 25% 25% (Or worse) who gets the left over 50%
 
Yeh same problem with the guys
After splitting 25% 25% (Or worse) who gets the left over 50%
Easy. The kids

Oh don't get me wrong I'm not calling camera tricks. But they see things differently.
For example when you press a button on your TV remote you don't see any light from the sender. Point it at your camera and it will glare with remarkable similarity to your video. It doesn't mean you've experienced Christianity. It means what you see isn't always what you get.
 
By Jesus if I haven't read that same post a dozen times.

The TRUTH is that this religious freedom bull**** is nothing more than maintaining the churches ability to continue to discriminate.
 

Dam! Is there a place the Poms didn't managed to messed up?

Now, now, the Yanks didn't do a number on the Brits. They overreached and fell on the sword on by themselves just fine.

The Yanks did actually prevented the Poms from becoming a colony of the 1000 year Third Reich, then again prevented it from falling behind the Iron Curtain.

The least one could do for such White Knight is to become their second lieutenant and hand over all the valuable assets and colonies you tried to enlightened but "failed"

oh btw, the new proxy wars in SE Asia is starting. Cambodia seems to be leaning Red and about to get sanctioned; the Yanks have finally figured out a way to feel the pain of the Muslims in Myanmar without ruining their image of Islam being evil and them clash of civilisation talking point.

I think a few close call on Duterte got him to open to talks with Yanks again.
 
Was this vote a survey or a plebiscite

I wonder how they are going to deal with Australian Constitution when it is based on our Christian heritage
I wonder how it will go with the High Court.

Just thoughts...

-----------------------

Protections for religious freedom, Macquack.

Freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of thought.

As I have said, this country was built on our Christian heritage, including our Constitution.

Everyone has a mother and father
Marriage is based on a man and a woman becoming a father and a mother, and raising their children.
That is the TRUTH.

You are entitled to your view.
 
Tink, the YES brigade already challenged the SSM survey in the high court saying it was unconstitutional. They were accused by the NO brigade of blocking the people from having their say.

The high court unanimously ruled against the challenge 7-0 and the people had their say.

Are you now suggesting the NO brigade should challenge the outcome in the high court again?

What are the odds?
 
'Love is Love'...until you disagree with the Rainbow Fascists.

Andrew Hastie is an MP who fought for his country in military service. Sadly he is the first of many who will cop this treatment, as the No campaign has predicted. Check the language of the 'Love is Love' crowd
 
Freedom of religion is just the freedom to discriminate. It's not really possible in this case to protect both freedom of religion and peoples right not to be discriminated against. Right now a baker can't refuse to bake a cake for a couple entering a civil union, I don't see why the law should be changed so that they can refuse a marriage. I baker would still be able to say "Just so you know I morally object to your marriage, would you still like me to proceed with your cake?". Common sense is going to prevail under most circumstances in this case and the gay couple would probably choose another bake that is happy to have their business.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...