- Joined
- 2 July 2008
- Posts
- 7,102
- Reactions
- 6
I'm a little surprised that there are no comments about the 4 Corners programme this evening, given the firm opinions that were expressed prior to it being aired.
Firstly, thank you for highlighting my typo. It is poor form on my part.
It has great relevance. A girl willingly went to a motel room with a footballer. If you can't see that, I'll post no more on this issue in regard to your posts.
Cheers,
The wife was watching something else. Was it any good?
I watched it. IMO:
* the testimony of the girls was devastating
*Matthew Johns immediate career is mortally damaged
* the program was portrayed in a way that seemed to me, to reflect a strongly feminist ideology.
* Knights got a puzzling treatment
* the person i feel most sorry for is Mrs Johns, dunno why
The footy show apology looks pretty pathetic after the airing of the episode - and Johns - 30 years old and married at the time
However I'm afraid the Knights lead with their chin. One item that has received media coverage this morning is the statement by one young player that it would be a nice touch after group sex, if instead of walking away they should get the victim a taxi home.
They still don't get it.
And , as awg mentioned, how must their wives feel?
thug minority
I am not surprised that Matthew Johns has not apologised to the NZ girl. His lawyers have probably advised him not to.
I reckon if she got Slater and Gordon on the job seeking compensation, Cronulla club and Johns would shell out big bucks to settle out of court. Maybe that would be the best way to give them a wake-up call.
unfortunatly for Cronulla they have no cash to do so, they are close to bankruptcy
I can assure you that the Christchurch police are not universally as sensitive as their representative appeared to be in this instance.The compassionate treatment the girl got from the Christchurch police is a credit to them. Where was the sisterhood when she needed them?
What has it got to do with "the sisterhood"?
How do you know what support or otherwise she did or did not receive from women?
Difficult to see how this tangent is relevant to the original offence.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?