- Joined
- 5 March 2008
- Posts
- 951
- Reactions
- 141
Skc,
The original timeframe presented was 5 years. 5 years is a long time to waste if that is what happens. My opinion is that it is far better to constantly compare "what ifs", including doing some paper trading on slightly different methods at the same time.
Hoping to become more competent by doing more of the same, will only work if there is a rational reason to continue what you are doing. The only way to find out if there is a rational basis is to compare with alternatives. I do not consider 'doing nothing' as a reasonable alternative.
I just had a quick look at the original portfolio (August 2011) and it's value as of December 2012 was some $800 higher (no allowance for divs), so changing the portfolio appears to be positive to that point.
As time goes by and he/she becomes more competent, then we can start
The original timeframe presented was 5 years. 5 years is a long time to waste if that is what happens. My opinion is that it is far better to constantly compare "what ifs", including doing some paper trading on slightly different methods at the same time.
Hoping to become more competent by doing more of the same, will only work if there is a rational reason to continue what you are doing. The only way to find out if there is a rational basis is to compare with alternatives. I do not consider 'doing nothing' as a reasonable alternative.
I just had a quick look at the original portfolio (August 2011) and it's value as of December 2012 was some $800 higher (no allowance for divs), so changing the portfolio appears to be positive to that point.