This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Richard Dawkins to citizen arrest the Pope

Status
Not open for further replies.

You have not read it properly, good and instinctively good is not the same. Instinct is something as Yung pointed out that comes through the genes, it is our propensity to certain behaviour. However this is not going to be realised without the right social setting, as a seed cannot grow without the right soil, sun and moisture.

Again however, what you counter with has nothing to do with the wrongs of the Papacy
 
“Never try to teach a pig to sing; it wastes your time and it annoys the pig.”

-Robert Heinlein
 
Two priests are standing side by side at the urinal in the Vatican toilets, answering a call of nature.

One of the priests glances down and notices that the other priest is wearing a nicotine patch on his member.

"Trying to quit, are you"? he asks the priest.

To which the second priest replies "Yes I am."

The first priest says "Well, those nicotine patches are meant to be worn on your arm or shoulder - it's not going to work if you wear it on your member."

The second priest answers "Well actually it's working quite well - I've already cut back to four butts a day".
 
“Never try to teach a pig to sing; it wastes your time and it annoys the pig.”

-Robert Heinlein

Are you in that metaphor suggesting that some people are less than others. This is one of the important issues that the thrust of Dawkins and his followers seek to point out for attention.

The changes if they are possible will not come from gurus, they will come from gradual changes in community attitudes through more equality in education so that people can make objective free choices. Our role should be to try and do what is right, spread it, and hope that others also pick up the reins.

However the closed shop of the Papacy is of no help whatsoever from what I can see.
 
Explod, you are making the mistake of thinking that Atlas is capable of rational thought. A cursory look at his rantings will show that he is talking nonsense and what's more I think he knows he is talking nonsense. He fancies himself as a clown.

To take his posts seriously will only encourage him. Ignore him and he, like all show-offs, will pull his head in. A clown without an audience is a nobody.
 
This whole attack on Catholic, is pathetic. No ads on TV, no hard sell, no brain washing. Should we appear more susceptible ?
Sorry, caught this thread late, but am absolutley shocked that this could be left to go through to the keeper.



I just don't know where to start, so I am not going to even start!
 
I wonder what Jesus would say if he saw it. I doubt if he would approve.

Well his father can see it, but he doesn't seem too concerned. Or perhaps he has become more tolerant than he was in the old days. when he would have put the slipper in for breaking the second commandment.

 
I wonder what Jesus would say if he saw it. I doubt if he would approve.

I think Jesus knows the help and time that the Catholic Church puts towards helping people worldwide.

It took them years for people to build these beautiful Cathedrals and still I look at them in wonder in how they did it : )
 


Regarding your questions Bunyip, sorry took me so long. I think Frank has answered that one perfectly

I think I mentioned to you last time about the World Youth Day and how the atmosphere with the Pope was just wonderful. The peace and the gatherings of all faiths, not just Catholics, peaceful, friendly - was just the best.

I dont think I Hero Worship, but I see the Pope as a messenger of Peace, and where he walks, helping people - its just a nice feeling

I do enjoy watching his mass services, I know you wont understand that one : )
 
I think Jesus knows the help and time that the Catholic Church puts towards helping people worldwide.

I hope he is also aware that the Papal attitude to contraception is responsoble for the deaths of thousands of Catholics in third world countries each year through AIDS and malnutrition.

I also doubt that these people will ever have the opportunity to join in tours of these cathedrals and "look at them in wonder". If they do, they may wonder why the church is more interested in material things than spiritual things.
 
It's pretty stupid - but funny - for non believers to try and use verses from the bible in a lame attempt to highlight a perceived aspect of a believers double standard.

A: they have no understanding of what the scripture they're using means, and

B; they look clumsy doing it

It's like watching some homonculous or something falling around with a massive sword trying to use it.
 
It's pretty stupid - but funny - for non believers to try and use verses from the bible in a lame attempt to highlight a perceived aspect of a believers double standard.

This is not scripture, but sound advice for anyone who may be tempted to respond to your nonsense posts;

Never argue with an idiot. They will only pull you down to their level, then beat you with experience
.
 

Fishbulb,as usual you are talking nonsense. this is the sort of sweeping generalisation we have all come to expect of you. It's a juvenile tactic people resort to when they know their argument has no legs and they have nothing useful to offer but still try and defend their position.

You don't have to be religious to understand the bible. Many of the worlds great bible scholars are non-believers

Most religious people have never read and have no understanding of the bible or the messages therein. They are content to believe the puerile mash fed to them by their priests.

Have you read the bible?? Do you understand everything in it?? No? I am sure your mother taught you about glass houses and throwing stones!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...